Skip to main content
Log in

A pharmacokinetic study comparing single and repeated oral doses of 20 mg and 40 mg omeprazole and its two optical isomers, S-omeprazole (esomeprazole) and R-omeprazole, in healthy subjects

  • Pharmacokinetics and Disposition
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the pharmacokinetics of S-omeprazole (esomeprazole), R-omeprazole and racemic omeprazole following single and repeated oral doses of 20 mg and 40 mg of each compound in healthy male and female subjects.

Methods

In an open, randomised, three-way, cross-over study, 12 subjects received 20 mg and another 12 subjects received 40 mg S-omeprazole, R-omeprazole and racemic omeprazole as oral solutions once daily for 5 days, separated by washout periods of at least 10 days. Blood samples were taken for analysis pre-dose and at selected time points during a 12-h period following drug administration on study day 1 and day 5. Pharmacokinetic parameters of S-omeprazole, R-omeprazole, racemic omeprazole and the two main metabolites (5-hydroxy and sulphone) were calculated using non-compartmental analysis.

Results

Following the 20-mg dose of each compound, values of the total area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) were 1.52, 0.62 and 1.04 μmol h/l for S-omeprazole, R-omeprazole and racemic omeprazole, respectively, on day 1. Respectively, AUC values on day 5 were 2.84, 0.68 and 1.63 μmol h/l. Corresponding values after the 40-mg doses were 3.88, 1.39 and 2.44 μmol h/l on day 1 and 9.32, 1.80 and 5.79 μmol h/l on day 5.

Conclusion

Treatment with S-omeprazole (esomeprazole; 20 mg and 40 mg) resulted in higher AUC values than with either R-omeprazole or racemic omeprazole after both single and repeated doses due to a lower metabolic rate of S-omeprazole than R-omeprazole and, consequently, racemic omeprazole. S-Omeprazole, R-omeprazole and the racemate were well tolerated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. AstraZeneca, Data on File

  2. Äbelö A, Andersson TB, Antonsson M, Naudot AK, Skånberg I, Weidolf L (2000) Stereoselective metabolism of omeprazole by human cytochrome P450 enzymes. Drug Metab Dispos 28:96–972

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Andersson T, Bredberg E, Sunzel M, Antonsson M, Weidolf L (2000) Pharmacokinetics (PK) and effect on pentagastrin stimulated peak acid output (PAO) of omeprazole and its 2 optical isomers, S-omeprazole/esomeprazole (E) and R-omeprazole (RO). Gastroenterology 118(4 Pt II):A1210

    Google Scholar 

  4. Andersson T, Hassan-Alin M, Hasselgren G, Röhss K, Weidolf L (2001) Pharmacokinetic studies with esomeprazole, the (S)-isomer of omeprazole. Clin Pharmacokinet 40(6):411–426

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lagerström PO, Persson BA (1984) Determination of omeprazole and metabolites in plasma and urine by liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr 309:347–356

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Andersson T (1991) Pharmacokinetics of omeprazole in man; with special reference to single and repeated administration, drug interactions and polymorphic metabolism. Thesis, Göteborg University, ISBN 91-628-0180-5

  7. Hassan-Alin M, Andersson T, Bredberg E, Röhss K (2000) Pharmacokinetics of esomeprazole after oral and intravenous administration of single and repeated doses to healthy subjects. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 56:665–670

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Andersson T, Cederberg C, Heggelund A, Lundborg P (1991) The pharmacokinetics of single and repeated once-daily doses of 10, 20 and 40 mg omeprazole as enteric-coated granules. Drug Invest 3:45–52

    Google Scholar 

  9. Andersson T, Cederberg C, Edvardsson G, Heggelund A, Lundborg P (1990) Effect of omeprazole treatment on diazepam plasma levels in slow versus normal rapid metabolisers of omeprazole. Clin Pharmacol Ther 47:79–85

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Andersson T, Miners JO, Veronese ME, Tassaneeyakul W, Tassaneeyakul W, Meyer UA, Birkett DJ (1993) Identification of human liver cytochrome P450 isoforms mediating omeprazole metabolism. Br J Clin Pharmacol 36:521–530

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Andersson T, Miners JO, Veronese ME, Birkett DJ (1994) Identification of human liver cytochrome P450 isoforms mediating secondary omeprazole metabolism. Br J Clin Pharmacol 37:597–604

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Junghard Ola, Hassan-Alin Mohammed, Hasselgren G (2000) The effect of AUC and Cmax of esomeprazole on acid secretion and intragastric pH (abstract 331). Gastroenterology 118 (4 Pt II):A17

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lind T, Cederberg C, Ekenved G, Haglund U, Olbe L (1983) Effect of omeprazole—a gastric proton pump inhibitor—on pentagastrin stimulated acid secretion in man. Gut 24:270–276

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lind T, Rydberg L, Kylebäck A, Jonsson A, Andersson T, Hasselgren G, Holmberg J, Röhss K (2000) Esomeprazole provides improved acid control vs omeprazole in patients with symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux diseases. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 14:861–867

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hunt RH (1999) Importance of pH control in the management of GERD. Arch Intern Med 159:649–57

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Dr. Ola Junghard and Emma Nauclér for the statistical analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Hassan-Alin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hassan-Alin, M., Andersson, T., Niazi, M. et al. A pharmacokinetic study comparing single and repeated oral doses of 20 mg and 40 mg omeprazole and its two optical isomers, S-omeprazole (esomeprazole) and R-omeprazole, in healthy subjects. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 60, 779–784 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-004-0841-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-004-0841-1

Keywords

Navigation