Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Medicines for children licensed by the European Medicines Agency (EMEA): the balance after 10 years

  • Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The 1995–2005 balance of EMEA activities in the field of paediatric medicines was evaluated, taking into account the number both of drugs authorised for children and paediatric studies supporting the Marketing Authorisation (MA).

Methods

Data on drugs authorised by EMEA were extracted from EPARs (European Public Assessment Reports). Active substance, year of approval, anatomical, therapeutic and chemical (ATC) code, indication, orphan status, ages, and registrative clinical studies characteristics were assessed.

Results

The percentage of authorised substances for paediatrics is 33.3%. This percentage decreased or increased when different subsets of medicines were considered [medicines for children under 2 years (23.4%), N-ATC code drugs (6%) and orphan drugs (46.4%)]. A total of 165 trials were included in the MA dossiers of 51 drugs at the time of approval, and additional 22 studies were added to the dossiers of 12 active substances submitted for paediatric variations. PK and Efficacy/Safety studies were performed for 32 (52%) active substances, while either one PK or one Efficacy/Safety study was carried out for 43 (69%) and 45 (73%) substances, respectively.

Conclusions

This report demonstrates that the total number of paediatric medicines approved by EMEA is stable over the 10-year period, while an increase in drugs to treat serious or orphan diseases has been observed. In addition, under the Centralised Procedure, a valuable number of paediatric trials have been submitted to support drug approval.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. TEDDY is a EU funded project aimed at favouring the development and the rationale use of drugs for the paediatric population.

  2. the Label (labelling) is defined according to the DIRECTIVE 2001/83/EC (art.1) as the ‘information on the immediate or outer packaging’ while the ‘Package leaflet’ is ‘a leaflet containing information for the user which accompanies the medicinal product’ [5].

  3. Orphan-like drugs are drugs intended for patients with rare diseases, authorised prior to introduction of the “Orphan” legislation and for whom EMEA provided support in the form of fee reductions for post-authorisation activities [6].

  4. Vaccines are excluded by the analysis.

References

  1. European Commission Enterprise Directorate General (2002) Better Medicines for Children. Proposed regulatory actions on paediatric medicinal products. Consultation document. Eudralex

  2. Ceci A, Felisi M, Catapano M, Baiardi P, Cipollina L, Ravera S, Bagnulo S, Reggio S, Rondini G (2002) Medicines for children licensed by the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 58:495–500

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. European Parliament and Council Regulation 141/2000/EC, 16 December 1999 on Orphan Medicinal Products. Official Journal of the European Communities L018/1 22/01/2000

  4. Baiardi P, Felisi M, Cipollina L, Lerro G, Carnelli V, Rondini G, Ceci A (2002) Availability of paediatric medicines in Italy. Quaderni di Pediatria 3:203–206

    Google Scholar 

  5. European Parliament and Council Directive 2001/83/EC, 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use. Official Journal of the European Communities L311, P. 0067–0128, 28.11.2001

  6. ICH (2000) Clinical Investigation of Medicinal Products in the Paediatric Population. ICH/Topic E11. Eudralex

  7. ICH (1997) General considerations for clinical trials. ICH Topic E8 Guideline

  8. EMEA (2001) Status Report on the implementation of the European Parliament Legislation on Orphan Medicinal Products EMEA/7381/01 (March 30th 2001)

  9. Impicciatore P, Choonara I (1999) Status of new medicines approved by the European Medicines Evaluation Agency regarding paediatric use. Br J Clin Pharmacol 48:15–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Koren G, Barzilay Z, Greenwald M (1986) Tenfold errors in administration of drugs doses: a neglected iatrogenic diseases in paediatrics. Paediatrics 77:848–849

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ghaleb MA, Barber N, Franklin BD, Wong ICK (2005) What constitutes a prescribing error in paediatrics? Qual Saf Health Care 14:352–357

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. ‘t Jong GW, van der Linden PD, Bakker EM, van der Lely N, Eland IA, Stricker BH, van den Anker JN (2002) Unlicensed and off-label drug use in a paediatric ward of a general hospital in the Netherlands. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 58:293–297

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Eurordis (2005) Medicines for children: better, more and faster. Eurordis position paper on the proposal for a regulation on medicinal products for paediatric use. Available at http://www.eurordis.org/IMG/pdf/eurordis_position_medicines_children_31jan05.pdf.

  14. European Commission (EC) (2004) Proposal for “Regulation Of The European Parliament And Of The Council on medicinal products for paediatric use and amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 1768/92, Directive 2001/83/EC and Regulation (EC) No 726/2004. COM(2004)

  15. Lantos JD (1999) The “inclusion benefit” in clinical trials. J Pediatr 134:130–131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Food and Drug Administration (1994) Specific requirements on content and format of labeling for human prescription drugs: revision of “pediatric use” subsection in the labeling. Fed Reg 59:64240–64250

    Google Scholar 

  17. Food and Drug Administration(1998) Regulations requiring manufacturers to assess the safety and effectiveness of new drugs and biological products in pediatric patients: final rule. Fed Reg 63:66632–66672

    Google Scholar 

  18. Apolone G, Joppi R, Bertele’ V, Garattini S (2005) Ten years of marketing approvals of anticancer drugs in Europe: regulatory policy and guidance documents need to find a balance between different pressures. Br J Cancer 93:504–509

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Joppi R, Bertele V, Garattini S (2006) Orphan drug development is progressing too slowly. Br J Clin Pharmacol 61:355–360

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Cristina Manfredi and Elisa Cattani for their technical and secretarial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Ceci.

Additional information

This study is part of the Network of Excellence TEDDY (Task-Force in Europe for the Drug Development in the Young) supported by the EC-Sixth Framework Program (Contract n. 0005216 LSHB-CT-2005-005126).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ceci, A., Felisi, M., Baiardi, P. et al. Medicines for children licensed by the European Medicines Agency (EMEA): the balance after 10 years. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 62, 947–952 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-006-0193-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-006-0193-0

Keywords

Navigation