Skip to main content
Log in

The angioarchitectural factors of the cerebral developmental venous anomaly; can they be the causes of concurrent sporadic cavernous malformation?

  • Diagnostic Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of this paper was to evaluate the angioarchitectural factors that can induce concurrent cavernous malformation (CM) in the territory of developmental venous anomaly (DVA).

Methods

From January 2006 to December 2007, 21 patients with 23 CMs in the territory of DVA were retrospectively analyzed (M; F = 12; 9, mean age = 53.3). Gadovist®-enhanced three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo images on a 3 T magnetic resonance (MR) scanner were used. We investigated the presence of angioarchitectural factors: factor 1, the angulated course of curved medullary or draining vein in the distal portion of CM; factor 2, narrowing of distal draining vein; factor 3, severe medullary venous tortuosity. These were also analyzed for control group of 23 subjects (M; F = 11; 12, mean age = 46).

Results

Factor 1 was demonstrated in 22 cases (97%) and the CM occurred in a position of 90° or less of an abrupt angulated medullary or draining vein in 15 cases (65%) of the study group. Factor 2 was found in 13 cases (57%) with the diameter reduction of 50% or more in five cases. The mean ratio of diameter reduction was 0.53. Factor 3 was found in 17 cases (74%). Analyzing the independent factors, the p values for factors 1 and 3 were <.05, i.e., statistically significant. If combination of more than two factors was present, the p values for all the combinations were <0.05, i.e., statistically significant.

Conclusion

Anatomical angioarchitectural factors might be the key factors in causing concurrent sporadic CM within the territory of DVA by causing disturbance of blood flow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CM:

cavernous malformation

DVA:

developmental venous anomaly

SPGR:

spoiled gradient-echo

MPRs:

multiplanar reconstructions

References

  1. Boukobza M, Enjolras O, Guichard JP, Gelbert F, Herbreteau D, Reizine D, Merland JJ (1996) Cerebral developmental venous anomalies associated with head and neck venous malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 17:987–994

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hammoud D, Beauchamp N, Wityk R, Yousem D (2002) Ischemic complication of a cerebral developmental venous anomaly: case report and review of the literature. J Comput Assist Tomogr 26(4):633–636

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ostertun B, Solymosi L (1993) Magnetic resonance angiography of cerebral developmental venous anomalies: its role in differential diagnosis. Neuroradiology 35:97–104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Oran I, Kiroglu Y, Yurt A, Ozer FD, Acar F, Dalbasti T, Yagci B, Sirikci A, Calli C (2009) Developmental venous anomaly (DVA) with arterial component: a rare cause of intracranial haemorrhage. Neuroradiology 51(1):25–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee C, Pennington MA, Kenney CM 3rd (1996) MR evaluation of developmental venous anomalies: medullary venous anatomy of venous angiomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 17:61–70

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sasaki O, Tanaka R, Koike T, Koide A, Koizumi T, Ogawa H (1991) Excision of cavernous angioma with preservation of coexisting venous angioma. Case report. J Neurosurg 75:461–464

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wilms G, Bleus E, Demaerel P, Marchal G, Plets C, Goffin J, Baert AL (1994) Simultaneous occurrence of developmental venous anomalies and cavernous angiomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 15(7):1247–1254, discussion 1255–1257

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rigamonti D, Spetzler RF (1998) The association of venous and cavernous malformations, report of four cases and discussion of the pathophysiological, diagnostic, and therapeutic implications. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 92:100–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dillon WP (1997) Cryptic vascular malformations: controversies in terminology, diagnosis, pathophysiology, and treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 18:1839–1846

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Perrini P, Lanzino G (2006) The association of venous developmental anomalies and cavernous malformations: pathophysiological, diagnostic, and surgical considerations. Neurosurg Focus 21(1):e5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Günel M, Awad IA, Finberg K, Steinberg GK, Craig HD, Cepeda O, Nelson-Williams C, Lifton RP (1996) Genetic heterogeneity of inherited cerebral cavernous malformation. Neurosurgery 38(6):1265–1271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Awad IA, Robinson JR Jr, Mohanty S, Estes ML (1993) Mixed vascular malformations of the brain: clinical and pathogenetic considerations. Neurosurgery 33(2):179–188, discussion 188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chang SD, Steinberg GK, Rosario M, Crowley RS, Hevner RF (1997) Mixed arteriovenous malformation and capillary telangiectasia: a rare subset of mixed vascular malformations. Case report. J Neurosurg 86(4):699–703

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Abdulrauf SI, Kaynar MY, Awad IA (1999) A comparison of the clinical profile of cavernous malformations with and without associated venous malformations. Neurosurgery 44(1):41–46, discussion 46–47

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wurm G, Schnizer M, Fellner FA (2005) Cerebral cavernous malformations associated with venous anomalies: surgical considerations. Neurosurgery 57(1):42–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. San Millán Ruíz D, Delavelle J, Yilmaz H, Gailloud P, Piovan E, Bertramello A, Pizzini F, Rüfenacht DA (2007) Parenchymal abnormalities associated with developmental venous anomalies. Neuroradiology 49:987–995

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Töpper R, Jürgens E, Reul J, Thron A (1999) Clinical significance of intracranial developmental venous anomalies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 67:234–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Günel M, Awad IA, Finberg K, Anson JA, Stenberg GK, Batjer HH, Kopitnik TA, Morrison L, Giannotta SL, Williams CN, Lifton RP (1996) A founder mutation as a cause of cerebral cavernous malformation in Hispanic Americans. N Engl J Med 334:946–951

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Verlaan DJ, Laurent SB, Sure U, Bertalanffy H, Andermann E, Andermann F, Rouleau GF, Siegel AM (2004) CCM1 mutation screen of sporadic cases with cerebral cavernous malformations. Neurology 62:1213–1215

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ciricillo SF, Dillon WP, Fink ME, Edwards MSB (1994) Progression of multiple cryptic vascular malformations associated with anomalous venous drainage.Case report. J Neurosurg 81:477–481

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wilson CB (1992) Cryptic vascular malformations. Clin Neurosurg 38:49–84

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Porter RW, Detwiler PW, Spetzler RF, Lawton MT, Baskin JJ, Derksen PT, Zabramski JM (1999) Cavernous malformations of the brainstem: experience with 100 patients. J Neurosurg 90:50–58

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. McLaughlin MR, Kondziolka D, Flickinger JC, Lunsford S, Lunsford LD (1998) The prospective natural history of cerebral venous malformations. Neurosurgery 43(2):195–200, discussion 200–201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tae-Sub Chung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hong, Y.J., Chung, TS., Suh, S.H. et al. The angioarchitectural factors of the cerebral developmental venous anomaly; can they be the causes of concurrent sporadic cavernous malformation?. Neuroradiology 52, 883–891 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-009-0640-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-009-0640-6

Keywords

Navigation