Abstract
This retrospective study was aimed to assess the clinical role of simultaneous liposuction, extent of skin undermining, and progressive tension suture on seroma formation following abdominoplasty. A chart review of 121 patients was done and divided in three groups. Group A included patients with abdominoplasty and liposuction of flanks. Group B included with abdominoplasty, liposuction of flanks, and progressive tension sutures. Group C had abdominoplasty, limited supraumbilical undermining, progressive tension sutures, liposuction of the abdominal wall and flanks. Seroma formation was based on the presence of fluctuant swelling in hypogastric area. Group A included 53 patients, had 1,096 g tissue excised (range 98–5,812) with an average liposuction of 854 cc with incidence of 26% seroma. Group B included 24 patients, with an average removal of 997 g tissue (range 75–2,440) with an average liposuction of 700 cc and an incidence of 7.7% seroma. Group C included 44 patients, had on average 803 g tissue excised (range 76–2,092) with an average liposuction of 816 and 610 cc from flanks and abdominal wall, respectively. There was 0% seroma formation. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA test and showed no statistical difference between tissue excised (p = 0.18) and liposuction performed (p = 0.25) on the hips and flanks. Blood loss (p < 0.001) and first 24 h drainage (p < 0.001) were significantly reduced in patients with progressive tension sutures and limited supraumbilical undermining. There was a significant reduction in seroma formation (p < 0.001) when progressive tension sutures were used with limited supraumbilical undermining and analyzed using Fischer exact test.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Le Louran C, Pascal JF (2000) High superior tension abdominoplasty. Aesth Plast Surg 24:375–381
Baroudi R, Ferreira CAA (1998) Seroma: how to avoid it and how to treat it. Aesthet Surg J 18:439–441
Zecha PJ, Missoten FEM (1999) Pseudocyst formation after abdominoplasty: extravasation of Morel-Lavallee. Br J Plast Surg 52:500–502
Ersek RA, Schade K (1990) Subcutaneous pseudobursa secondary to suction and surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 85:442–445
Pollock H, Pollock T (2000) Progressive tension sutures: a technique to reduce local complications in abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:2583
Mladick R (2001) Progressive tension sutures to reduce complications in abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg J 107:619
Antonetti JW, Antonetti AR (2010) Reducing seroma in outpatient abdominoplasty: analysis of 516 consecutive cases. Aesthet Surg J 30:418–427
Khan UD (2008) Risk of seroma in simultaneous liposuction with abdominoplasty and role of progressive tension sutures. Aesth Plast Surg 32:93–99
Nahas FX, Ferreira LM, Ghelfond C (2007) Does quilting sutures prevent seroma in abdominoplasty? Plast Reconstr Surg 119:1060–1064
Andrades P, Prado A, Danilla S et al (2007) Progressive tension sutures in the prevention of postabdominoplasty seroma: a prospective, randomised, double blind clinical trial. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:935–946
Khan S, Teotia SS, Mullis WF et al (2006) Do progressive tension sutures really decrease complications in abdominoplasty? Ann Plast Surg 56:14–21
Deos MF, Arnt RA, Gus EI (2009) Tensioned reverse abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:2134–2141
Warner JP, Gutowski KA (2009) Abdominoplasty with progressive tension closure using a barbed suture technique. Aesthet Surg J 29:221–225
Saldanha OR, De Souza Pinto EB, Matos WN Jr, Lucon RL, Magalhaes FF, Bello EML (2001) Lipoabdominoplasty without undermining. Aesthet Surg J 21:518–526
Pascal JF (2008) Discussion: risk of seroma in simultaneous liposuction with abdominoplasty and role of progressive tension sutures. Aesth Plast Surg 32:100
Rebello C, Franco T (1977) Abdominoplasty through a submammary incision. Int Surg 62:462–463
Rahban SR, Gross JE (2007) A new approach to correction of truncal redundancy after massive weight loss—the lateral thoracoabdominoplasty. Aesthet Surg J 27:518–523
Mohammad JA, Warnke PH, Stavraky W (1998) Ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of fluid collection complication following abdominoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 41:498–502
Di Martino M, Nahas FX, Barbosa MV, Montecinos Ayaviri NA, Kimura AK, Barella SM, Novo NF, Ferreira LM (2010) Seroma in lipoabdominoplasty and abdominoplasty: a comparative study using ultrasound. Plast Reconstr Surg 126(5):1742–1751
Keramidas EG, Rodopoulou S, Khan UD (2006) Pseudocyst formation after abdominoplasty combined with liposuction: a case report and review of the literature. Eur J Plast Surg 28:400–402
Matarasso A (1989) Abdominoplasty. Clin Plast Surg 16:289
Ovens L, Pickford MA (2009) Effect of quilting sutures on seroma formation post-abdominoplasty. Eur J Plast Surg 32(4):177–180
Najera RM, Asheld W, Sayeed SM, Glickman LT (2011) Comparison of seroma formation following abdominoplasty with or without liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(1):417–422
Saldanha O (2006) Lipoabdominoplasty, vol 11, 1st edn. Dilivros, Rio de Janeiro, pp 90–91
Matarasso A (1995) Liposuction as an adjunct to a full abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 95:829
Huger WE Jr (1979) The anatomic rationale for abdominal lipectomy. Am Surg 45:612
Taylor GI, Palmer JH (1987) The vascular territories (angiosomes) of the body: experimental study and clinical application. Br J Plast Surg 40:113–141
Arantes HL, Rosique RG, Rosique MJF, Melega JM (2010) The use of quilting sutures in abdominoplasty does not require aspiratory drainage for prevention of seroma. Aesth Plast Surg 34:102–104
Acknowledgement
Statistical analysis was done by Dr Amir Omair, Biostatistician, Department of Medical Education, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Disclosure
No financial support or benefits have been received by me or any member of my immediate family in the preparation of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Khan, U.D. Seroma formation following abdominoplasty: a retrospective clinical review following three different techniques. Eur J Plast Surg 35, 299–308 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-011-0617-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-011-0617-7