Skip to main content
Log in

Retrograde intrarenal surgery in patients with isolated anomaly of kidney rotation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Urolithiasis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to investigate feasibility of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in patients with isolated anomaly of kidney rotation with kidney stones. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent RIRS due to kidney stones in three referral hospitals. Twenty-four patients who had kidney rotation were included in this study. The patients with horseshoe kidney or pelvic kidney were not included in the study. The patients were evaluated for final success 1 month after surgery. Success was defined as stone-free or fragment smaller than 3 mm. Mean age of patients was 39.5 years (1–71 years) and male/female ratio was 3:1. Mean stone size was 13.46 mm (5–30 mm). Twelve (50 %) patients had the operation on the right side and other 12 (50 %) patients had on the left side. Eighteen (75 %) patients were stone-free after single procedure. And stone-free rate increased to 83.3 % after additional treatment procedures. When we compared the successful and failed procedures, gender, stone side and size, preoperative hydronephrosis, access sheet usage, ureteral double-J stent insertion were not statistically significant in two groups. We did not confront major complication. RIRS seems to be an effective and safe treatment option for renal stones in patients with isolated anomaly of kidney rotation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Puppo P, Bottino P, Germinale F, Caviglia C, Ricciotti G, Giuliani L (1990) Flexible antegrade and retrograde nephroscopy: review of 50 cases. Eur Urol 17:193–199

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Abe R, Etori K, Kato T, Sato K (1990) Experience with transurethral uretero-nephrolithotripsy using flexible nephro-ureteroscope. Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi 81:1667–1674

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fuchs GJ, Fuchs AM (1990) Flexible endoscopy of the upper urinary tract. A new minimally invasive method for diagnosis and treatment. Urologe A 29:313–320

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Knudsen B, Miyaoka R, Shah K et al (2010) Durability of the next-generation flexible fiberoptic ureteroscopes: a randomized prospective multi-institutional clinical trial. Urology 75:534–539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bach C, Nesar S, Kumar P et al (2012) The new digital flexible ureteroscopes: ‘size does matter’-increased ureteric Access sheath use! Urol Int 89:408–411

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Laing KA, Lam TBL, McClinton S et al (2012) Outcomes of ureteroscopy for stone disease in pregnancy: results from a systemic review of the literature. Urol Int 89:380–386

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Resorlu B, Ozyuvali E, Oguz U, Bozkurt OF, Unsal A (2012) Retrograde intrarenal surgery in patients with spinal deformities. J Endourol 26:1131–1135. doi:10.1089/end.2012.0031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Caskurlu T, Atis G, Arikan O, Pelit ES, Kilic M, Gurbuz C (2013) The impact of body mass index on the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal stone surgery. Urology 81:517–521. doi:10.1016/j.urology

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sari E, Tepeler A, Yuruk E, Resorlu B, Akman T, Binbay M, Armagan A, Unsal A, Muslumanoglu AY (2013) Effect of the body mass index on outcomes of flexible ureterorenoscopy. Urolithiasis [Epub ahead of print]

  10. Atis G, Resorlu B, Gurbuz C, Arikan O, Ozyuvali E, Unsal A, Caskurlu T (2013) Retrograde intrarenal surgery in patients with horseshoe kidneys. Urolithiasis 41:79–83. doi:10.1007/s00240-012-0534-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Palmero JL, Amoros A, Ramírez M, Pastor JC, Benedicto A (2012) Surgical therapy of lithiasis in horseshoe kidney. Actas Urol Esp 36:439–443. doi:10.1016/j.acuro.2011.10.005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sizonov VV, Kogan MI (2011) Characteristics of hydronephrosis due to obstruction of the pyeloureteral segment combined with dorsal rotation of the kidney. Urologiia 4:3–7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shapiro E, Bauer SB, Chow JS (2012) Anomalies of the upper urinary tract. Campbell-Walsh urology. In: Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA (eds) 10th edn. Philadelphia, pp 3123–3160

  14. Mosavi-Bahar SH, Amirzargar MA, Rahnavardi M, Moghaddam SM, Babbolhavaeji H, Amirhasani S (2007) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with kidney malformations. J Endourol 21:520–524

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Binbay M, Istanbulluoglu O, Sofikerim M, Beytur A, Skolarikos A, Akman T, Huri E, Ozturk B, Kural AR, Muslumanoglu AY (2011) Effect of simple malrotation on percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a matched pair multicenter analysis. J Urol 185:1737–1741. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2010.12.060

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tunc L, Tokgoz H, Tan MO, Kupeli B, Karaoglan U, Bozkirli I (2004) Stones in anomalous kidneys: results of treatment by shock wave lithotripsy in 150 patients. Int J Urol 11:831–836

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Küpeli B, Isen K, Biri H, Sinik Z, Alkibay T, Karaoğlan U, Bozkirli I (1999) Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in anomalous kidneys. J Endourol 13:349–352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Turk C, Knoll T, Petrik A et al (2013) Guideline on urolithiasis. 2013:1-100. Available at: http://www.uroweb.org/gls/pdf/21_Urolithiasis_LRV2.pdf

  19. Resorlu B, Unsal A, Tepeler A, Atis G, Tokatli Z, Oztuna D, Armagan A, Gurbuz C, Caskurlu T, Saglam R (2012) Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children with moderate-size kidney stones: results of multi-institutional analysis. Urology 80:519–523. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2012.04.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lim SH, Jeong BC, Seo SI, Jeon SS, Han DH (2010) Treatment outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones and predictive factors of stone-free. Korean J Urol 51:82–777. doi:10.4111/kju.2010.51.11.777

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cansino Alcaide JR, Reinoso Elbers J, López Sánchez D, Pérez González S, Rodriguez Aguilera Bazán, Rando A, Tous A, Hidalgo Togores L, De La Peña Barthel J (2010) Flexible ureterorenoscopy (URS): technique and results. Arch Esp Urol 63:70–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Resorlu B, Unsal A, Gulec H, Oztuna D (2012) A new scoring system for predicting stone-free rate after retrograde intrarenal surgery: the “resorlu-unsal stone score”. Urology 80:512–518. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2012.02.072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schoenthaler M, Wilhelm K, Katzenwadel A, Ardelt P, Wetterauer U, Traxer O, Miernik A (2012) Retrograde intrarenal surgery in treatment of nephrolithiasis: is a 100 % stone-free rate achievable? J Endourol 26:93–489. doi:10.1089/end.2011.0405

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ural Oğuz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oğuz, U., Balci, M., Atis, G. et al. Retrograde intrarenal surgery in patients with isolated anomaly of kidney rotation. Urolithiasis 42, 141–147 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-013-0625-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-013-0625-0

Keywords

Navigation