Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Limited role of gadolinium to detect active sacroiliitis on MRI in juvenile spondyloarthritis

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study is to determine the added diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared to routine non contrast-enhanced MRI to detect active sacroiliitis in clinically juvenile spondyloarthritis (JSpA).

Materials and methods

A total of 80 children clinically suspected for sacroiliitis prospectively underwent MRI of the sacroiliac (SI) joints. Axial and coronal T1-weighted (T1), Short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) and fat-saturated T1-weighted gadolinium-DTPA (Gd) contrast-enhanced (T1/Gd) sequences were obtained. The presence of bone marrow edema (BME), capsulitis, enthesitis, high intra-articular STIR signal, synovial enhancement and a global diagnostic impression of the MRI for diagnosis of sacroiliitis was recorded.

Results

STIR and T1/Gd sequences had 100 % agreement for depiction of BME, capsulitis and enthesitis. High intra-articular STIR signal was seen in 18/80 (22.5 %) patients, 15 (83 %) of whom also showed synovial enhancement in the T1/Gd sequence. Sensitivity (SN) and specificity (SP) for a clinical diagnosis of JSpA were similar for high STIR signal (SN = 33 %, SP = 85 %) and T1/Gd synovial enhancement (SN = 36 %, SP = 92 %). Positive likelihood ratio (LR+) for JSpA was twice as high for synovial enhancement than high STIR signal (4.5 compared to 2.2). Global diagnostic impression was similar (STIR: SN = 55 %, SP = 87 %, LR + =4 .2; T1/Gd: SN = 55 %, SP = 92 %, LR + = 6.9).

Conclusion

MRI without contrast administration is sufficient to identify bone marrow edema, capsulitis and retroarticular enthesitis as features of active sacroiliitis in juvenile spondyloarthritis. In selected cases when high STIR signal in the joint is the only finding, gadolinium-enhanced images may help to confirm the presence of synovitis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burgos-Vargas R. The juvenile-onset spondylarthritides. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2002;28(3):531–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Colbert RA. Classification of juvenile spondyloarthritis: enthesitis-related arthritis and beyond. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2010;6(8):477–85.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Petty RE, Southwood TR, Manners P, et al. International League of Association for Rheumatology Classification of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: second revision. Edmonton 2001. J Rheumatol. 2004;31(2):390–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lambert RG, Salonen D, Rahman P, et al. Adalimumab significantly reduces both spinal and sacroiliac joint inflammation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56(12):4005–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tse SML, Laxer RM. New advances in juvenile spondyloarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2012;8:269–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Baraliakos X, Haibel H, Listing J, Sieper J, Braun J. Continuous long-term anti-TNF therapy does not lead to an increase in the rate of new bone formation over 8 years in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(4):710–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Eshed I, Bollow M, McGonagle DG, et al. MRI of enthesitis of the appendicular skeleton in spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66(12):1553–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sieper J, Rudwaleit M, Baraliakos X, et al. The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) handbook: a guide to assess spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68 suppl 2:ii1–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jaremko JL, Liu L, Winn NJ, Ellsworth JE, Lambert RGW. Diagnostic utility of magnetic resonance imaging and radiography in juvenile spondyloarthritis: evaluation of the sacroiliac joints in controls and affected subjects. J Rheumatol. 2014;41(5):963–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bollow M, Biedermann T, Kannenberg J, et al. Use of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging to detect sacroiliitis in HLA-B27 positive and negative children with juvenile arthritides. J Rheumatol. 1998;25(3):556–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lin C, MacKenzie JD, Courtier JL, Gu JT, Milojevic D. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in juvenile spondyloarthropathy and effects of treatment observed on subsequent imaging. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2014;12:25.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bollow M, Braun J, Biedermann T, et al. Use of contrast-enhanced MR imaging to detect sacroiliitis in children. Skeletal Radiol. 1998;27(11):606–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pagnini I, Savelli S, Matucci-Cerinic M, Fonda C, Cimaz R, Simonini G. Early predictors of juvenile sacroiliitis in enthesitis-related arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2010;37(11):2395–401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Althoff CE, Feist E, Burova E, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of active sacroiliitis: do we really need gadolinium? Eur J Radiol. 2009;71(2):232–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. De Hooge M, Van Den Berg R, Navarro-Compan V, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the sacro-iliac joints in the early detection of spondyloarthritis: no added value of gadolinium compared with short tau inversion recovery sequence. Rheumatology. 2013;52:1220–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Madsen KB, Egund N, Jurik AG. Grading of inflammatory disease activity in the sacroiliac joints with magnetic resonance imaging: comparison between short-tau inversion recovery and gadolinium contrast-enhanced sequences. J Rheumatol. 2010;37(2):393–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hermann KG, Landewe RB, Braun J, van der Heijde D. Magnetic resonance imaging of inflammatory lesions in the spine in ankylosing spondylitis clinical trials: is paramagnetic contrast medium necessary? J Rheumatol. 2005;32(10):2056–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Baraliakos X, Hermann KG, Landewe R, et al. Assessment of acute spinal inflammation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis by magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison between contrast enhanced T1 and short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64(8):1141–4.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Maksymowicz H, Kowalewski K, Lubkowska K, Zołud W, Sąsiadek M. Diagnostic value of gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging of active sacroiliitis in seronegative spondyloarthropathy. Pol J Radiol. 2010;75(2):58–65.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jones KM, Unger EC, Granstrom P, Seeger JF, Carmody RF, Yoshino M. Bone marrow imaging using STIR at 0.5 and 1.5 T. Magn Reson Imaging. 1992;10(2):169–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Maksymowych WP, Weber U. Diagnostic utility of MRI in early spondyloarthritis. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2011;13(5):402–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Puhakka KB, Melsen F, Jurik AG, Boel LW, Vesterby A, Egund N. MR imaging of the normal sacroiliac joint with correlation to histology. Skeletal Radiol. 2004;33(1):15–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Burdiles A, Babyn PS. Pediatric bone marrow MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2009;17(3):391–409.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jans L, Coeman L, Van Praet L, et al. How sensitive and specific are MRI features of sacroiliitis for diagnosis of spondylarthritis in patients with inflammatory back pain? JBR-BTR. 2014;97:202–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Ghent, Belgium

    N. Herregods, A. Leus, K. Verstraete & L. Jans

  2. Department of Radiology & Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta Hospital, 8440-112 Street, Edmonton, T6G 2B7, AB, Canada

    J. L. Jaremko

  3. Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Ruhr-University Bochum, Claudiusstr. 45, 44649, Herne, Germany

    X. Baraliakos

  4. Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Ghent, Belgium

    J. Dehoorne

Authors
  1. N. Herregods
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. L. Jaremko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. X. Baraliakos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. Dehoorne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. Leus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. K. Verstraete
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. L. Jans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Herregods.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Herregods, N., Jaremko, J.L., Baraliakos, X. et al. Limited role of gadolinium to detect active sacroiliitis on MRI in juvenile spondyloarthritis. Skeletal Radiol 44, 1637–1646 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-015-2211-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-015-2211-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation