Abstract
Pathological femoral head and neck fractures are commonly treated by arthroplasty. Treatment options for the trochanteric region or below are not clearly defined. The purpose of this retrospective, comparative, double-centre study was to analyse survival and influences on outcome according to the surgical technique used to treat pathological proximal femoral fractures, excluding fractures of the femoral head and neck. Fifty-nine patients with 64 fractures were operated up on between 1998 and 2004 in two tertiary referral centres and divided into two groups. One group (S, n = 33) consisted of patients who underwent intramedullary nailing alone, and the other group (R, n = 31) consisted of patients treated by metastatic tissue resection and reconstruction by means of different implants. Median survival was 12.6 months with no difference between groups. Surgical complications were higher in the R group (n = 7) vs. the S group (n = 3), with no statistically significant difference. Patients with surgery-related complications had a higher survival rate (p = 0.049), as did patients with mechanical implant failure (p = 0.01). Survival scoring systems did not correlate with actual survival. Resection of metastases in patients with pathological fractures of the proximal femur, excluding femoral head and neck fractures, has no influence on survival. Patients with long postoperative survival prognosis are at risk of implant-related complications.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Roodman GD (2004) Mechanisms of bone metastasis. N Engl J Med 350(16):1655–1664
Bauer HC, Wedin R (1995) Survival after surgery for spinal and extremity metastases. Prognostication in 241 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 66(2):143–146
Clarke HD, Damron TA, Sim FH (1998) Head and neck replacement endoprosthesis for pathologic proximal femoral lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 353:210–217
Capanna R, Campanacci DA (2001) The treatment of metastases in the appendicular skeleton. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83(4):471–481
Wedin R, Bauer HC (2005) Surgical treatment of skeletal metastatic lesions of the proximal femur: endoprosthesis or reconstruction nail? J Bone Joint Surg Br 87(12):1653–1657. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.87B12.16629
van Doorn R, Stapert JW (2000) Treatment of impending and actual pathological femoral fractures with the long Gamma nail in The Netherlands. Eur J Surg 166(3):247–254. doi:10.1080/110241500750009366
Sarahrudi K, Hora K, Heinz T, Millington S, Vecsei V (2006) Treatment results of pathological fractures of the long bones: a retrospective analysis of 88 patients. Int Orthop 30(6):519–524. doi:10.1007/s00264-006-0205-9
Weber KL, Randall RL, Grossman S, Parvizi J (2006) Management of lower-extremity bone metastasis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(Suppl 4):11–19. doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.00635
Enneking WF, Spanier SS, Goodman MA (1980) A system for the surgical staging of musculoskeletal sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res 153:106–120
Perez CA, Bradfield JS, Morgan HC (1972) Management of pathologic fractures. Cancer 29(3):684–693
Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, Carbone PP (1982) Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 5(6):649–655
Tomita K, Kawahara N, Kobayashi T, Yoshida A, Murakami H, Akamaru T (2001) Surgical strategy for spinal metastases. Spine 26(3):298–306
Sokol DK, Wilson J (2008) What is a surgical complication? World J Surg 32(6):942–944
Windhager R, Ritschl P, Rokus U, Kickinger W, Braun O, Kotz R (1989) The incidence of recurrence of intra- and extra-lesional operated metastases of long tubular bones. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 127(4):402–405
Moradi B, Zahlten-Hinguranage A, Lehner B, Zeifang F (2010) The impact of pathological fractures on therapy outcome in patients with primary malignant bone tumours. Int Orthop 34(7):1017–1023
Jacofsky DJ, Haidukewych GJ (2004) Management of pathologic fractures of the proximal femur: state of the art. J Orthop Trauma 18(7):459–469. doi:00005131-200408000-00013
Cole AS, Hill GA, Theologis TN, Gibbons CL, Willett K (2000) Femoral nailing for metastatic disease of the femur: a comparison of reamed and unreamed femoral nailing. Injury 31(1):25–31. doi:S0020-1383(99)00195-3
Kinkel S, Stecher J, Gotterbarm T, Bruckner T, Holz U (2009) Compound osteosynthesis for osteolyses and pathological fractures of the proximal femur. Orthopedics 32(6):403
Schneiderbauer MM, von Knoch M, Schleck CD, Harmsen WS, Sim FH, Scully SP (2004) Patient survival after hip arthroplasty for metastatic disease of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(8):1684–1689. doi:86/8/1684
Chandrasekar CR, Grimer RJ, Carter SR, Tillman RM, Abudu AT (2008) Modular endoprosthetic replacement for metastatic tumours of the proximal femur. J Orthop Surg Res 3:50
Hattori H, Mibe J, Matsuoka H, Nagai S, Yamamoto K (2007) Surgical management of metastatic disease of the proximal femur. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 15(3):295–298
Leithner A, Radl R, Gruber G, Hochegger M, Leithner K, Welkerling H, Rehak P, Windhager R (2008) Predictive value of seven preoperative prognostic scoring systems for spinal metastases. Eur Spine J 17(11):1488–1495. doi:10.1007/s00586-008-0763-1
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Christina Levy for proofreading the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zacherl, M., Gruber, G., Glehr, M. et al. Surgery for pathological proximal femoral fractures, excluding femoral head and neck fractures. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 35, 1537–1543 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1160-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1160-z