Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pazopanib versus sunitinib for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients with poor-risk features

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

With the exception of temsirolimus, clinical trials in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) with poor-risk features are lacking. We previously showed that vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors are active and well tolerated by poor-risk group. This study evaluated and compared the efficacy and safety of pazopanib and sunitinib in this group.

Methods

We reviewed the medical records of all patients with mRCC who had received pazopanib or sunitinib at Asan Medical Center. We only assessed patients who had three or more poor-risk features as determined in the advanced renal cell carcinoma trial.

Results

Between December 2006 and April 2015, a total of 172 patients who met the inclusion criteria received pazopanib (n = 72) or sunitinib (n = 100). The clinical characteristics were as follows in the pazopanib/sunitinib groups: median age = 60/57 years (range 34–80/17–83); clear cell type = 65/80 (90/80 %); and prior nephrectomy = 46/56 (64/56 %). The disease control rates in the pazopanib/sunitinib groups were 82/60 % (p = 0.002). With a median follow-up duration of 14.2 months (range 1.6–65.0), the median overall survival and progression-free survival in the pazopanib/sunitinib groups were 14.4/8.9 (p = 0.030) and 9.8/4.3 months (p = 0.040), respectively. The common all-grade toxicities for pazopanib/sunitinib were anemia (32 vs. 77 %), neutropenia (33 vs. 56 %), increased aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase levels (36 vs. 35 %), fatigue (38 vs. 55 %), and hand–foot syndrome (17 vs. 51 %).

Conclusions

Pazopanib and sunitinib are both active and well tolerated in mRCC patients with poor-risk features, but pazopanib might be more effective in this group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Janzen NK, Kim HL, Figlin RA, Belldegrun AS (2003) Surveillance after radical or partial nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma and management of recurrent disease. Urol Clin N Am 30(4):843–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cohen HT, McGovern FJ (2005) Renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 353(23):2477–2490. doi:10.1056/NEJMra043172

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Motzer RJ, Bacik J, Murphy BA, Russo P, Mazumdar M (2002) Interferon-alfa as a comparative treatment for clinical trials of new therapies against advanced renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 20(1):289–296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hudes G, Carducci M, Tomczak P, Dutcher J, Figlin R, Kapoor A, Staroslawska E, Sosman J, McDermott D, Bodrogi I, Kovacevic Z, Lesovoy V, Schmidt-Wolf IG, Barbarash O, Gokmen E, O’Toole T, Lustgarten S, Moore L, Motzer RJ (2007) Temsirolimus, interferon alfa, or both for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 356(22):2271–2281. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa066838

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Heng DY, Xie W, Regan MM, Warren MA, Golshayan AR, Sahi C, Eigl BJ, Ruether JD, Cheng T, North S, Venner P, Knox JJ, Chi KN, Kollmannsberger C, McDermott DF, Oh WK, Atkins MB, Bukowski RM, Rini BI, Choueiri TK (2009) Prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted agents: results from a large, multicenter study. J Clin Oncol 27(34):5794–5799. doi:10.1200/jco.2008.21.4809

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Heng DY, Xie W, Regan MM, Harshman LC, Bjarnason GA, Vaishampayan UN, Mackenzie M, Wood L, Donskov F, Tan MH, Rha SY, Agarwal N, Kollmannsberger C, Rini BI, Choueiri TK (2013) External validation and comparison with other models of the International Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium prognostic model: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 14(2):141–148. doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(12)70559-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Tomczak P, Michaelson MD, Bukowski RM, Rixe O, Oudard S, Negrier S, Szczylik C, Kim ST, Chen I, Bycott PW, Baum CM, Figlin RA (2007) Sunitinib versus interferon alfa in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 356(2):115–124. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa065044

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Tomczak P, Michaelson MD, Bukowski RM, Oudard S, Negrier S, Szczylik C, Pili R, Bjarnason GA, Garcia-del-Muro X, Sosman JA, Solska E, Wilding G, Thompson JA, Kim ST, Chen I, Huang X, Figlin RA (2009) Overall survival and updated results for sunitinib compared with interferon alfa in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 27(22):3584–3590. doi:10.1200/jco.2008.20.1293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Sternberg CN, Davis ID, Mardiak J, Szczylik C, Lee E, Wagstaff J, Barrios CH, Salman P, Gladkov OA, Kavina A, Zarba JJ, Chen M, McCann L, Pandite L, Roychowdhury DF, Hawkins RE (2010) Pazopanib in locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: results of a randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 28(6):1061–1068. doi:10.1200/jco.2009.23.9764

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Cella D, Reeves J, Hawkins R, Guo J, Nathan P, Staehler M, de Souza P, Merchan JR, Boleti E, Fife K, Jin J, Jones R, Uemura H, De Giorgi U, Harmenberg U, Wang J, Sternberg CN, Deen K, McCann L, Hackshaw MD, Crescenzo R, Pandite LN, Choueiri TK (2013) Pazopanib versus sunitinib in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 369(8):722–731. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1303989

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gore ME, Szczylik C, Porta C, Bracarda S, Bjarnason GA, Oudard S, Hariharan S, Lee SH, Haanen J, Castellano D, Vrdoljak E, Schoffski P, Mainwaring P, Nieto A, Yuan J, Bukowski R (2009) Safety and efficacy of sunitinib for metastatic renal-cell carcinoma: an expanded-access trial. Lancet Oncol 10(8):757–763. doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(09)70162-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee JL, Park I, Park K, Park S, Ahn Y, Ahn JH, Kim TW, Ahn S, Song C, Hong JH, Kim CS, Ahn H (2012) Efficacy and safety of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and poor risk features. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 138(4):687–693. doi:10.1007/s00432-012-1148-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Britten CD, Kabbinavar F, Hecht JR, Bello CL, Li J, Baum C, Slamon D (2008) A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of sunitinib administered daily for 2 weeks, followed by a 1-week off period. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 61(3):515–524. doi:10.1007/s00280-007-0498-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer (Oxford, England: 1990) 45(2):228–247. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Escudier B, Pluzanska A, Koralewski P, Ravaud A, Bracarda S, Szczylik C, Chevreau C, Filipek M, Melichar B, Bajetta E, Gorbunova V, Bay JO, Bodrogi I, Jagiello-Gruszfeld A, Moore N (2007) Bevacizumab plus interferon alfa-2a for treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a randomised, double-blind phase III trial. Lancet (London, England) 370(9605):2103–2111. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61904-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rini BI, Halabi S, Rosenberg JE, Stadler WM, Vaena DA, Archer L, Atkins JN, Picus J, Czaykowski P, Dutcher J, Small EJ (2010) Phase III trial of bevacizumab plus interferon alfa versus interferon alfa monotherapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: final results of CALGB 90206. J Clin Oncol 28(13):2137–2143. doi:10.1200/jco.2009.26.5561

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Yoo C, Kim JE, Lee JL, Ahn JH, Lee DH, Lee JS, Na S, Kim CS, Hong JH, Hong B, Song C, Ahn H (2010) The efficacy and safety of sunitinib in korean patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: high incidence of toxicity leads to frequent dose reduction. Jpn J Clin Oncol 40(10):980–985. doi:10.1093/jjco/hyq073

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Escudier B, Porta C, Bono P, Powles T, Eisen T, Sternberg CN, Gschwend JE, De Giorgi U, Parikh O, Hawkins R, Sevin E, Negrier S, Khan S, Diaz J, Redhu S, Mehmud F, Cella D (2014) Randomized, controlled, double-blind, cross-over trial assessing treatment preference for pazopanib versus sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: PISCES study. J Clin Oncol 32(14):1412–1418. doi:10.1200/JCO.2013.50.8267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mekhail TM, Abou-Jawde RM, Boumerhi G, Malhi S, Wood L, Elson P, Bukowski R (2005) Validation and extension of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering prognostic factors model for survival in patients with previously untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 23(4):832–841. doi:10.1200/jco.2005.05.179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was presented in part at the 7th European Multidisciplinary Meeting on Urologic Cancers, November 12–15, 2015, in Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

This study was supported by a grant (HI12C1788, HI14C1931, HI14C1731) from the Korean Health Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Korea.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jae Lyun Lee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

J. L. Lee received speaker honoraria from Astellas, Novartis, and Pfizer, and research funding from Bayer, Exelixis, Janssen, Novartis, and Pfizer. J. H. Kim and I. Park declare that they had no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional Review Board of Asan Medical Center and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments. For retrospective design of the current study, formal informed consent was not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, J.H., Park, I. & Lee, J.L. Pazopanib versus sunitinib for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients with poor-risk features. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 78, 325–332 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-016-3093-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-016-3093-8

Keywords

Navigation