Abstract
We consider the problem of what is being optimized in human actions with respect to various aspects of human movements and different motor tasks. From the mathematical point of view this problem consists of finding an unknown objective function given the values at which it reaches its minimum. This problem is called the inverse optimization problem. Until now the main approach to this problems has been the cut-and-try method, which consists of introducing an objective function and checking how it reflects the experimental data. Using this approach, different objective functions have been proposed for the same motor action. In the current paper we focus on inverse optimization problems with additive objective functions and linear constraints. Such problems are typical in human movement science. The problem of muscle (or finger) force sharing is an example. For such problems we obtain sufficient conditions for uniqueness and propose a method for determining the objective functions. To illustrate our method we analyze the problem of force sharing among the fingers in a grasping task. We estimate the objective function from the experimental data and show that it can predict the force-sharing pattern for a vast range of external forces and torques applied to the grasped object. The resulting objective function is quadratic with essentially non-zero linear terms.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- x :
-
An independent variable
- J :
-
An objective function of an optimization problem
- \({\mathcal C}\) :
-
Constraints for an optimization problem
- \({\left\langle J,\mathcal C\right\rangle}\) :
-
An optimization problem with the objective function J and the constrains \({\mathcal{C}}\)
- f i (·), g i (·):
-
Scalar functions
- C, b:
-
A matrix and a vector of the linear constraints Cx = b
- a i :
-
A scalar value
- \({\mathcal I}\) :
-
A set of indexes
References
Ahuja RK, Orlin JB (2001) Inverse optimization. Oper Res 49(5): 771–783
Ait-Haddou R, Binding P, Herzog W (2000) Theoretical considerations on cocontraction of sets of agonistic and antagonistic muscles. J Biomech 33(9): 1105–1111
Anderson FC, Pandy MG (1999) A dynamic optimization solution for vertical jumping in three dimensions. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 2(3): 201–231
Bernstein NA (1967) The coordination and regulation of movements. Pergamon, Oxford
Biess A, Liebermann DG, Flash T (2007) A computational model for redundant human three-dimensional pointing movements: integration of independent spatial and temporal motor plans simplifies movement dynamics. J Neurosci 27(48): 13045–13064
Bottasso CL, Prilutsky BI, Croce A, Imberti E, Sartirana S (2006) A numerical procedure for inferring from experimental data the optimization cost functions using a multibody model of the neuro-musculoskeletal system. Multibody Syst Dynam 16: 123–154
Cole KJ, Johansson RS (1993) Friction at the digit-object interface scales the sensorimotor transformation for grip responses to pulling loads. Exp Brain Res 95(3): 523–532
Collins JJ (1995) The redundant nature of locomotor optimization laws. J Biomech 28(3): 251–267
Crowninshield RD, Brand RA (1981) A physiologically based criterion of muscle force prediction in locomotion. J Biomech 14(11): 793–801
Cruse H, Wischmeyer E, Brwer M, Brockfeld P, Dress A (1990) On the cost functions for the control of the human arm movement. Biol Cybern 62(6): 519–528
Edelman S, Flash T (1987) A model of handwriting. Biol Cybern 57(1–2): 25–36
Engelbrecht S (2001) Minimum principles in motor control. J Math Psychol 45(3): 497–542
Erdemir A, McLean S, Herzog W, van den Bogert AJ (2007) Model-based estimation of muscle forces exerted during movements. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 22(2): 131–154
Flash T, Hogan N (1985) The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model. J Neurosci 5(7): 1688–1703
Herzog W (1992) Sensitivity of muscle force estimations to changes in muscle input parameters using nonlinear optimization approaches. J Biomech Eng 114(2): 267–268
Herzog W, Binding P (1992) Predictions of antagonistic muscular activity using nonlinear optimization. Math Biosci 111(2): 217–229
Johansson RS, Westling G (1984) Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when lifting rougher or more slippery objects. Exp Brain Res 56(3): 550–564
Kuo AD, Zajac FE (1993) Human standing posture: multi-joint movement strategies based on biomechanical constraints. Prog Brain Res 97: 349–358
Kuzelicki J, Zefran M, Burger H, Bajd T (2005) Synthesis of standing-up trajectories using dynamic optimization. Gait Posture 21(1): 1–11
Niu X, Latash ML, Zatsiorsky VM (2007) Prehension synergies in the grasps with complex friction patterns: local versus synergic effects and the template control. J Neurophysiol 98(1): 16–28
Pataky TC, Latash ML, Zatsiorsky VM (2004) Prehension synergies during nonvertical grasping, ii: modeling and optimization. Biol Cybern 91(4): 231–242
Pham QC, Hicheur H, Arechavaleta G, Laumond JP, Berthoz A (2007) The formation of trajectories during goal-oriented locomotion in humans. ii. a maximum smoothness model. Eur J Neurosci 26(8): 2391–2403
Plamondon R, Alimi AM, Yergeau P, Leclerc F (1993) Modelling velocity profiles of rapid movements: a comparative study. Biol Cybern 69(2): 119–128
Prilutsky BI (2000) Coordination of two- and one-joint muscles: functional consequences and implications for motor control. Motor Control 4(1): 1–44
Prilutsky BI, Gregory RJ (2000) Analysis of muscle coordination strategies in cycling. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 8(3): 362–370
Prilutsky BI, Zatsiorsky VM (2002) Optimization-based models of muscle coordination. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 30(1): 32–38
Raikova RT, Prilutsky BI (2001) Sensitivity of predicted muscle forces to parameters of the optimization-based human leg model revealed by analytical and numerical analyses. J Biomech 34(10): 1243–1255
Redl C, Gfoehler M, Pandy MG (2007) Sensitivity of muscle force estimates to variations in muscle-tendon properties. Hum Mov Sci 26(2): 306–319
Shim JK, Latash ML, Zatsiorsky VM (2003) Prehension synergies: trial-to-trial variability and hierarchical organization of stable performance. Exp Brain Res 152(2): 173–184
Siemienski A (2006) Direct solution of the inverse optimization problem of load sharing between muscles. J Biomech 39: S45
Tsirakos D, Baltzopoulos V, Bartlett R (1997) Inverse optimization: functional and physiological considerations related to the force-sharing problem. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 25(4–5): 371–407
Westling G, Johansson RS (1984) Factors influencing the force control during precision grip. Exp Brain Res 53(2): 277–284
Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2008) Multifinger prehension: an overview. J Mot Behav 40(5): 446–476
Zatsiorsky VM, Gregory RW, Latash ML (2002) Force and torque production in static multifinger prehension: biomechanics and control. ii. control. Biol Cybern 87(1): 40–49
Zatsiorsky VM, Gao F, Latash ML (2003) Prehension synergies: effects of object geometry and prescribed torques. Exp Brain Res 148(1): 77–87
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Terekhov, A.V., Pesin, Y.B., Niu, X. et al. An analytical approach to the problem of inverse optimization with additive objective functions: an application to human prehension. J. Math. Biol. 61, 423–453 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-009-0306-3
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-009-0306-3