Abstract
In 2005, a new phase for primary health care (PHC) in Portugal began, leading to the voluntary and independent creation of Family Health Units. The impact of this reform is now being witnessed, which justifies the need to evaluate its results as far as best practices in PHC are concerned. This work uses a value-based data envelopment analysis (DEA) method, which combines an additive DEA model with multi-criteria decision analysis concepts, to allow incorporating managerial preferences in the performance assessment of 12 health centres in a Portuguese region. Two models are presented for evaluating access to PHC, which resulted from discussions with a group of decision makers. This analysis helped the decision makers in the identification of best practices, sources of inefficiency and gaps relatively to the best practices, thus leading to shape opportunities for improvement.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ali AI, Lerme CS, Seiford L (1995) Components of efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 80:462–473
Almeida PN, Dias LC (2012) Value-based DEA models: application-driven developments. J Oper Res Soc 63:16–27
Amado CAF, Dyson RG (2008) On comparing the performance of primary care providers. Eur J Oper Res 185:915–932
Amado CAF, Santos SP (2009) Challenges for performance assessment and improvement in primary health care: the case of the Portuguese health centres. Health Policy 91:43–56
Andersen P, Petersen NC (1993) A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Manag Sci 39:1261–1264
Athanassopoulos AD, Podinovski VV (1997) Dominance and potential optimality multiple criteria models decision analysis with imprecise information. J Oper Res Soc 48:142–150
Baker R (1992) General practice in Gloucestershire, Avon and Somerset: explaining variations in standards. Br J Gen Pract 42:415–418
Barros PP, Machado SR, Simões JA (2011) Portugal health system review. Health Syst Transit 13:1–156
Campbell SM, Roland MO, Quayle JA, Buetow SA, Shekelle PG (1998) Quality indicators for general practice: which ones can general practitioners and health authority managers agree are important and how useful are they? J Public Health Med 20:414–421
Carter M, Hans EW, Kolisch R (2012) Health care operations management. OR Spectr 34:315–317
Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2:429–444
Cook WD, Zhu J (2009) Piecewise linear output measures in DEA (third revision). Eur J Oper Res 197:312–319
Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Zhu J (2004) Handbook on data envelopment analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston
Dias LC, Clímaco JN (2000) Additive aggregation with variable interdependent parameters: the VIP analysis software. J Oper Res Soc 51:1070–1082
Donabedian A (1980) The definition of quality and approaches to its assessment. Health Administration Press, Ann Arbor
Dyson RG, Allen R, Camanho AS, Podinovski VV, Sarrico CS, Shale EA (2001) Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. Eur J Oper Res 132:245–259
Ferreira C, Marques RC, Nicola P (2013) On evaluating health centers groups in Lisbon and Tagus Valley: efficiency, equity and quality. BMC Health Serv Res 13:529
Giuffrida A (1999) Productivity and efficiency changes in primary care: a Malmquist index approach. Health Care Manag Sci 2:11–26
Giuffrida A, Gravelle H, Sutton M (2000) Efficiency and administrative costs in primary care. J Health Econ 19:983–1006
Golany B (1988) An interactive MOLP procedure for the extension of data envelopment analysis to effectiveness analysis. J Oper Res Soc 39:725–734
Goodwin P, Wright G (1998) Decision analysis for management judgment, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester
Gouveia MC (2012) Efficiency evaluation with a DEA-MCDA method with incorporation of preferences and data uncertainty. Ph.D. thesis, University of Coimbra. http://hdl.handle.net/10316/21070. Accessed 18 June 2014
Gouveia MC, Dias LC, Antunes CH (2008) Additive DEA based on MCDA with imprecise information. J Oper Res Soc 59:54–63
Gouveia MC, Dias LC, Antunes CH (2013) Super-efficiency and stability intervals in additive DEA. J Oper Res Soc 64:86–96
Gouveia MC, Dias LC, Antunes CH, Boucinha J, Inácio CF (2015) Benchmarking of maintenance and outage repair in an electricity distribution company using the value-based DEA method. Omega 53:104–114
Halme M, Joro T, Korhonen P, Salo SE, Wallenius J (1999) A value efficiency approach to incorporating preference information in data envelopment analysis. Manag Sci 45:103–115
Hollingsworth B, Dawson PJ, Maniadakis N (1999) Efficiency measurement of health care: a review of non-parametric methods and applications. Health Care Manag Sci 2:161–172
Huang YG, McLaughlin CP (1989) Relative efficiency in rural primary health care: an application of data envelopment analysis. Health Serv Res 24:143–158
IGIF (2006) Estatística do Movimento Assistencial dos Centros de Saúde em 2005. Instituto de Gestão Informática e Financeira da Saúde (in Portuguese)
Joro T, Korhonen P, Wallenius J (1998) Structural comparison of data envelopment analysis and multiple objective linear programming. Manag Sci 44:962–970
Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoff. Wiley, New York
Kirigia JM, Emrouznejad A, Sambo LG, Munguti N, Liambila W (2004) Using data envelopment analysis to measure the technical efficiency of public health centers in Kenya. J Med Syst 28:155–166
Lapão LV (2008) The role of complexity and innovation in the new primary care governance model in Portugal. Innov J-Spec Issue Complex 13(3):1–12. Article 8
Lapão LV, Dussault G (2012) From policy to reality: clinical managers’ views of the organizational challenges of primary care reform in Portugal. Int J Health Plan Manag 27:295–307
Linna M, Nordblad A, Koivu M (2003) Technical and cost efficiency of oral health care provision in Finnish health centres. Soc Sci Med 56:343–353
Mavrotas G, Trifillis P (2006) Multicriteria decision analysis with minimum information: combining DEA with MAVT. Comput Oper Res 33:2083–2098
McColl A, Roderick P, Gabbay J, Smith H, Moore M (1998) Performance indicators for primary care groups: an evidence based approach. Br Med J 317:1354–1360
Milliken O, Devlin RA, Barham V, Hogg W, Dahrouge S, Russell G (2011) Comparative efficiency assessment of primary care service delivery models using data envelopment analysis. Can Public Policy 37:85–109
Nuti S, Daraio C, Speroni C, Vainieri M (2011) Relationships between technical efficiency and the quality and costs of health care in Italy. Int J Qual Health Care 23:324–330
PHP (2010) Metodologia de Contratualização. Administração Central do Sistema de Saúde, Coordenação Estratégica dos CSP (in Portuguese)
Podinovski VV (2004) Production trade-offs and weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis. J Oper Res Soc 55:1311–1322
Proctor S, Campbell J (1999) A developmental performance framework for primary care. Int J Health Qual Assur 12:279–286
Rosenman R, Friesner D (2004) Scope and scale inefficiencies in physician practices. Health Econ 13:1091–1116
Rouse P, Harrison J, Turner N (2011) Cost and performance: complements for improvement. J Med Syst 35:1063–1074
Salinas-Jimenez J, Smith P (1996) Data envelopment analysis applied to quality in primary health care. Ann Oper Res 67:141–161
Salo AA, Hämäläinen RP (2001) Preference ratios in multiattribute evaluation (PRIME)—elicitation and decision procedures under incomplete information. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A 31:533–545
Sherman HD, Zhu J (2006) Improving service performance using data envelopment analysis. Springer, New York
Sommersguter-Reichmann M (2003) Analysing hospital productivity changes using non-parametric approaches. OR Spectr 25:145–160
Thanassoulis E, Boussofiane A, Dyson RG (1996) A comparison of data envelopment analysis and ratio analysis as tools for performance assessment. Omega 24:229–244
Thanassoulis E, Portela MC, Allen R (2004) Incorporating value judgments in DEA. In: Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Zhu J (eds) Handbook on data envelopment analysis. Kluwer, Boston, pp 99–137
Thanassoulis E, Portela MC, Graveney M (2012) Estimating the scope for savings in referrals and drug prescription costs in the General Practice units of a UK Primary Care Trust. Eur J Oper Res 221:432–444
Thrall RM (2000) Measures in DEA with an application to the Malmquist index. J Product Anal 13:125–137
van den Hombergh P, Grol R, van den Hoogen HJM, van den Bosch WJHM (1998) Assessment of management in general practice: validation of a practice visit method. Br J Gen Pract 48:1743–1750
von Winterfeldt D, Edwards W (1986) Decision analysis behavioral research. Cambridge University Press, New York
Wagner J, Shimshak D, Novak M (2003) Advances in physician profiling: the use of DEA. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 37:141–163
Acknowledgments
This work has been partially supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology under project Grant UID/MULTI/00308/2013. Authors are also indebted to the anonymous reviewers and the area editor for their constructive comments and suggestions on earlier versions of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gouveia, M., Dias, L.C., Antunes, C.H. et al. An application of value-based DEA to identify the best practices in primary health care. OR Spectrum 38, 743–767 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-015-0407-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-015-0407-x