Skip to main content
Log in

Utility of C57BL/6J × 129/SvJae embryonic stem cells for generating chromosomal deletions: tolerance to γ radiation and microsatellite polymorphism

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Mammalian Genome Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 May 1998

Abstract

We have previously reported a method for making nested deletion complexes in mice by irradiation of ES cells. The key to this technology is that F1 hybrid ES cells (called v17.2) of the genotype (BALB/cTa × 129/SvJae) retain germline colonizing ability after exposure to levels of ionizing radiation that induce chromosomal deletions. In an effort to identify other genotypes of ES cells that are suitable for this technology, the radiation sensitivity of the cell line v6.4, which is of the genotype (C57BL/6J × 129/SvJae), was investigated. After treatment with a range of radiation exposures, the developmental potential of these cells was assayed by injecting them into blastocysts to generate chimeric mice. These experiments showed that while cell lethality increased as the level of radiation increased, the surviving ES cells retained full totipotency at all exposure levels, up to 400 Rads. Because polymorphism between parental microsatellite alleles in the F1 hybrid ES cells is important for ascertaining the sizes of induced deletions, the 129/SvJ and 129/SvJae allele sizes of 48 microsatellite loci on chromosome (Chr) 17 were determined. This revealed a higher level of polymorphism between 129 and C57BL/6J on Chr 17. The radiation tolerance, high polymorphism between parental strains, and presence of the widely used C57BL/6J strain component make v6.4 ES cells an attractive cell line for generating radiation-induced chromosomal deletions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carr AM, Hoekstra MF, (1995) The cellular responses to DNA damage. Trends Cell Biol 5, 32–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cattanach BM, Burtenshaw MD, Rasberry C, Evans EP (1993) Large deletions and other gross forms of chromosome imbalance compatible with viability and fertility in the mouse. Nat Genet 3, 56–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich W, Katz H, Lincoln SE, Shin HS, Friedman J, Dracopoli NC, Lander ES (1992) A genetic map of the mouse suitable for typing intraspecific crosses. Genetics 131, 423–447

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich WF, Miller JC, Steen RG, Merchant M, Damron D, Gross A, Joyce DC, Wessel M, Dredge RD, Marquis A, Stein LD, Goodman N, Page DC, Lander ES (1994) A genetic map of the mouse with 4006 simple sequence length polymorphisms. Nat Genet 7, 220–245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eguchi Kasai K, Kosaka T, Sato K, Kaneko I (1991) Reparability of DNA double-strand breaks and radiation sensitivity in five mammalian cell lines. Int J Radiat Biol 59, 97–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavathas P, Bach F, DeMars R (1980) Gamma ray-induced loss of expression of HLA and glyoxalase I alleles in lymphoblastoid cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77, 4251–4255

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miles C, Sargent G, Phear G, Meuth M (1990) DNA sequence analysis of gamma radiation-induced deletions and insertions at the APRT locus of hamster cells. Mol Carcinog 3, 233–242

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Potten CS (1992) The significance of spontaneous and induced apoptosis in the gastrointestinal tract of mice. Cancer Metastasis Rev 11, 179–195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez-Solis R, Davis CA, Bradley A (1993) Gene targeting in embryonic stem cell. Methods Enzymol 225, 855–878

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rinchik EM, Russell LB (1990) Germ-line deletion mutations in the mouse: tools for intensive functional and physical mapping of regions of the mammalian genome. In Genome Analysis, Vol I: Genetic and Physical Mapping. (Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press), pp 121–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle T (1987) Radiation—the genetic risk. Trends Genet 3, 152–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver LM (1995) Laboratory mice. In Mouse Genetics, Concepts and Applications. (New York, N. Y.: Oxford University Press, Inc.), pp 32–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson EM, Linder CC, Sargent EE, Davisson MT, Mobraaten LE, Sharp JJ (1997) Genetic variation among 129 substrains and its importance for targeted mutagenesis in mice. Nat Genet 16, 19–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Storer JB (1966) Acute responses to ionizing radiation. In Biology of the Laboratory Mouse, EL Green (ed) (New York: McGraw-Hill), pp 427–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Storer JB, Fry RJ, Ullrich RL (1982) Somatic effects of radiation. In The mouse in Biomedical Research, HL Foster, JD Small, JG Fox (eds) (New York, NY: Academic Press, Inc.), pp 134–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Threadgill DW, Yee D, Matin A, Nadeau JH, Magnuson T (1997) Genealogy of the 129 inbred strains: 129/SvJ is a contaminated inbred strain. Mamm Genome 8, 390–393

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Urlaub G, Mitchell P, Kas E, Chasin L, Funanage V, Myoda T, Hamlin J (1986) Effect of gamma rays at the dihydrofolate reductase locus: deletions and inversions. Somatic Cell Mol Genet 12, 555–566

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • You Y, Bergstrom R, Klemm M, Lederman B, Nelson H, Ticknor C, Jaenisch R, Schimenti J (1997) Chromosomal deletion complexes in mice by radiation of embryonic stem cells. Nat Genet 15, 285–288

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/PL00006945.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

You, Y., Bersgtram, R., Klemm, M. et al. Utility of C57BL/6J × 129/SvJae embryonic stem cells for generating chromosomal deletions: tolerance to γ radiation and microsatellite polymorphism. Mammalian Genome 9, 232–234 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s003359900731

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s003359900731

Keywords

Navigation