Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fecal and urinary continence after scope-assisted anorectovaginoplasty for female anorectal malformation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

We assessed continence after scope-assisted anorectovaginoplasty (SARVP) for female anorectal malformation (FARM).

Methods

Five FARM cases were assessed; cases 1 and 2: cloacal malformation; case 3: urogenital sinus, and rectovestibular fistula (RF); case 4: RF, absent vagina, and sacral anomaly; case 5: covered cloacal exstrophy. Treatment was SARVP in all cases, with perineal vaginoplasty (case 1), vagina pull-through (PT) similar to Georgeson’s colon PT (case 2), and the use of the native RF/cloaca channel as a vagina (cases 3–5). Continence was assessed pre and postoperatively.

Results

SARVP was performed in the lithotomy position without repositioning. Mean age at surgery was 3.2 (1.7–5.5) years. Current mean age: 8.8 years (range 7.5–12.2). Mean follow-up: 5.7 years. Preoperative continence: fecal: all had stomas; urinary: cases 1 and 2: continent; cases 3–5: incontinent. Postoperative continence: fecal: cases 1–3: continent; case 4: incontinent; case 5: awaiting stoma closure; urinary: cases 1 and 2: continent; cases 3 and 4: incontinent; case 5: continent (intermittent catheterization). Fetal continence evaluation questionnaire (CEQ) scores for cases 1–4 were 7.5, 9, 10, and 2 (maximum score 10, mean 7.1).

Conclusion

Scope assistance improves visualization, thus pelvic sphincter dissection/division is minimized with less detrimental impact on postoperative continence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Georgeson KE, Inge TH, Albanese CT (2000) Laparoscopically assisted anorectal pull-through for high imperforate anus—a new technique. J Pediatr Surg 35:927–930

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tei E, Yamataka A, Segawa O, Kobayashi H, Lane GJ, Tobayama S, Kameoka S, Miyano T (2003) Laparoscopically assisted anorectovaginoplasty for selected types of female anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 38:1770–1774

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yamataka A, Segawa O, Yoshida R, Kobayashi H, Kameoka S, Miyano T (2001) Laparoscopic muscle electrostimulation during laparoscopy-assisted anorectal pull-through for high imperforate anus. J Pediatr Surg 36:1659–1661

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ichijo C, Kaneyama K, Hayashi Y, Koga H, Okazaki T, Lane GJ, Kurosaki Y, Yamataka A (2008) Midterm postoperative clinicoradiologic analysis of surgery for high/intermediate-type imperforate anus: prospective comparative study between laparoscopy-assisted and posterior sagittal anorectoplasty. J Pediatr Surg 43:158–162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Watayo H, Kaneyama K, Ichijo C, Hayashi Y, Lane GJ, Yamataka A (2008) Is intraoperative anal endosonography necessary during laparoscopy-assisted anorectoplasty for high/intermediate type imperforate anus? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18:123–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Oshita M, Okazaki T, Lee KD, Lane GJ, Yamataka A (2007) Complete covered cloacal exstrophy. Pediatr Surg Int 23:1029–1031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tong Q, Tang S, Pu J, Mao Y, Wang Y, Li S, Cao Q, Ruan Q (2011) Laparoscopically assisted anorectal pull-through for high imperforate anus in infants: intermediate results. J Pediatr Surg 46:1578–1586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kudou S, Iwanaka T, Kawashima H, Uchida H, Nishi A, Yotsumoto K, Kaneko M (2005) Midterm follow-up study of high-type imperforate anus after laparoscopically assisted anorectoplasty. J Pediatr Surg 40:1923–1926

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Busacca M, Perino A, Venezia R (1996) Laparoscopic-ultrasonographic combined technique for the creation of neovagina in Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Techniques and Instrumentation 66:1039–1041

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pena A, Hong A (2000) Advances in the management of anorectal malformations. Am J Surg 180:370–376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Levitt MA, Pena A (2010) Cloacal malformations: lessons learned from 490 cases. Semin Pediatr Surg 19:128–138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Peña A, Levitt MA, Hong A, Midulla P (2004) Surgical management of cloacal malformations: a review of 339 patients. J Pediatr Surg 39:470–479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aide (S0991013) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sport, Science, and Technology, Japan (MEXT) through the Foundation for Strategic Research Projects in Private Universities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atsuyuki Yamataka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yamataka, A., Goto, S., Kato, Y. et al. Fecal and urinary continence after scope-assisted anorectovaginoplasty for female anorectal malformation. Pediatr Surg Int 28, 907–912 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-012-3141-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-012-3141-3

Keywords

Navigation