Abstract
Introduction
Evidence to support or refute closed suction drainage (CSD) in primary total hip replacement (THR) is not conclusive. Our anecdotical experience was that persistent ooze from the drainage hole often delayed wound recovery. We hypothesized that, without CSD, wound care would be simplified without short or long term disadvantage.
Materials and methods
Hundred patients scheduled for primary THR were randomly assigned for CSD or non-drainage. Drains were withdrawn at day 2. Pain, wound hematoma, number of dressing changes, time of persistent discharge from the operation site (skin incision and drain hole), total blood loss and number of blood transfusions were prospectively recorded. Hip function, presence of heterotopic ossifications (HTO) and complications were recorded at a follow visit 1 year after surgery.
Results
Wound sites managed without CSD needed significantly less wound dressings (P < 0.001) and were dry at an earlier time (P < 001). Despite a significant bigger subfascial hematoma in the non-drained group (P < 0.05), in terms of pain, thigh swelling, total blood loss, number of transfusions needed, hip function and HTO no difference was recorded between the groups (P = 0.2–0.82).
Conclusion
To omit CSD in primary THR results in simplified and more rapid wound management without any disadvantage at short and long term.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acus RW III, Clark JM, Gradisar IA Jr, Kovacik MW (1992) The use of postoperative suction drainage in total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 15:1325–1328
Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH Jr (1973) Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement: incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg 55-A:1629–1632
Cobb JP (1990) Why use drains ? J Bone Joint Surg 72-B:993–995
Crevoisier XM, Reber P, Noesberger B (1998) Is suction drainage necessary after total joint arthroplasty? A prospective study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 117:121–124
Cruse PJE, Foord R (1973) A five-year prospective study of 23,649 surgical wounds. Arch Surg 107:206–210
Della Valle AG, Slullitel G, Vestri R, Comba F, Buttaro M, Piccaluga F (2004) No need for routine closed suction drainage in elective arhtroplasty of the hip. A prospective randomized trial in 104 operations. Acta Orthop Scand 75:30–33
Duranthon LD, Grimberg J. Vandenbussche E, Mondoloni D, Augerau P (2000) Use of postoperative suction drainage in bipolar arthroplasty for hip fracture. Rev Chir Orthop 86:370–372
Kim YH, Cho SH, Kim RS (1998) Drainage versus nondrainage in simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 13:156–161
Magee C, Rodeheaver GT, Golden GR, Fox J, Edgerton MT, Edlich RF (1976) Potentiation of wound infection by surgical drains. Am J Surg 131:547–549
Magnussen PA, Jackman JSG, Iyer S, Adam EJ (1986) A study of wound haematoma after hip surgery using ultrasound. J Bone Joint Surg 68-B:497
Mengal B, Aebi J, Rodriguez A, Lemaire R (2001) A prospective randomized study of wound drainage versus non-drainage in primary total hip or knee arthroplasty. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 87:29–39
Murphy JP, Scott JE (1993) The effectiveness of suction drainage in total hip arthroplasty. J R Soc Med 86:388–389
Niskanen RO, Korkala OL, Haapala J, Kuokkanen HO, Kaukonen JP, Salo SA (2000) Drainage is of no use in primary uncomplicated cemented hip and knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty 15:567–569
Ovadia D, Luger E, Bickels J, Menachem A, Dekel S (1997) Efficacy of closed wound drainage after total joint arthroplasty. A prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty 12:317–321
Overgaard S, Thomsen NO, Kulinski B, Mossing NB (1993) Closed suction drainage after hip arthroplasty. Prospective study of bacterial contamination in 81 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 64:417–420
Parker MJ, Roberts C (2001) Losed suction surgical wound drainage after orthopaedic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD001825
Ravikumar KJ, Alwan T, Fordydce MJF, Tuson KWR (2001) Drainage versus non-drainage in totoal hip arthroplasty. A prospective randomised study. Hip Int 11:49–54
Ritter MA, Keating EM, Faris PM (1994) Closed wound drainage in total hip or total knee replacement. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg 76:35–38
Sorensen AI, Sorensen TS (1991) Bacterial growth on suction drain tips. Prospective study of 489 clean orthopedic operations. Acta Orthop Scand 62:451–454
Varley GW, Milner S, Turner GM, Crisp AJ, Szypryt EP (1994) Ultrasound assessment of the efficacy of wound drains. J R Coll Surg Edinb 39:97–99
Waugh TR, Stinchfield FE (1961) Suction drainage of orthopaedic wounds. J Bone Joint Surg 43-A:939–946
Widman J, Jacobsson H, Larsson SA, Isacson J (2002) No effect of drains on the postoperative hematoma volume in hip replacement surgery: a randomized study using scintigraphy. Acta Orthop Scand 73:625–629
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dora, C., von Campe, A., Mengiardi, B. et al. Simplified wound care and earlier wound recovery without closed suction drainage in elective total hip arthroplasty. A prospective randomized trial in 100 operations. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127, 919–923 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-006-0260-0
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-006-0260-0