Skip to main content
Log in

The volume of the human knee joint

  • Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Despite its clinical relevance, particularly in septic knee surgery, the volume of the human knee joint has not been established to date. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine knee joint volume and whether or not it is dependent on sex or body height.

Methods

Sixty-one consecutive patients (joints) who were due to undergo endoprosthetic joint replacement were enrolled in this prospective study. During the operation, the joint volume was determined by injecting saline solution until a pressure of 200 mmHg was achieved in the joint.

Results

The average volume of all knee joints was 131 ± 53 (40–290) ml. The volume was not found to be dependent on sex, but it was dependent on the patients’ height (R = 0.312, p = 0.014). This enabled an estimation of the joint volume according to V = 1.6 height − 135.

Conclusions

The considerable inter-individual variance of the knee joint volume would suggest that it should be determined or at least estimated according to body height if the joint volume has consequences for the diagnostics or therapy of knee disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kuo C-L, Chang J-H, Wu C-C et al (2011) Treatment of septic knee arthritis: comparison of arthroscopic debridement alone or combined with continuous closed irrigation-suction system. J Trauma 71:454–459. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e3181ec4734

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yanmış I, Ozkan H, Koca K et al (2011) The relation between the arthroscopic findings and functional outcomes in patients with septic arthritis of the knee joint, treated with arthroscopic debridement and irrigation. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 45:94–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Balabaud L, Gaudias J, Boeri C et al (2007) Results of treatment of septic knee arthritis: a retrospective series of 40 cases. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:387–392. doi:10.1007/s00167-006-0224-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vispo Seara JL, Barthel T, Schmitz H, Eulert J (2002) Arthroscopic treatment of septic joints: prognostic factors. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 122:204–211. doi:10.1007/s00402-001-0386-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stutz G, Kuster MS, Kleinstück F, Gächter A (2000) Arthroscopic management of septic arthritis: stages of infection and results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8:270–274

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jerosch J, Hoffstetter I, Schröder M, Castro WH (1995) Septic arthritis: arthroscopic management with local antibiotic treatment. Acta Orthop Belg 61:126–134

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Visuri T, Kiviluoto O (1986) Arthroscopic volume of the knee joint in young male adults. Scand J Rheumatol 15:251–254

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Waddell DD, Marino AA (2007) Chronic knee effusions in patients with advanced osteoarthritis: implications for functional outcome of viscosupplementation. J Knee Surg 20:181–184

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Metzger P, Carney J, Kuhn K et al (2012) Sensitivity of the saline load test with and without methylene blue dye in the diagnosis of artificial traumatic knee arthrotomies. J Orthop Trauma 26:347–349. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182255167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Keese GR, Boody AR, Wongworawat MD, Jobe CM (2007) The accuracy of the saline load test in the diagnosis of traumatic knee arthrotomies. J Orthop Trauma 21:442–443. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e31812e5186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nord RM, Quach T, Walsh M et al (2009) Detection of traumatic arthrotomy of the knee using the saline solution load test. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:66–70. doi:10.2106/JBJS.G.01682

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tornetta P, Boes MT, Schepsis AA et al (2008) How effective is a saline arthrogram for wounds around the knee? Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:432–435. doi:10.1007/s11999-007-0006-5

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Draeger RW, Singh B, Parekh SG (2009) Quantifying normal ankle joint volume: an anatomic study. Indian J Orthop 43:72–75. doi:10.4103/0019-5413.45326

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sekiya JK, Willobee JA, Miller MD et al (2007) Arthroscopic multi-pleated capsular plication compared with open inferior capsular shift for reduction of shoulder volume in a cadaveric model. Arthroscopy 23:1145–1151. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2007.05.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Montet X, Eberlin J-L, Bianchi S, Fasel J (2005) Assessment of intra-articular volume of the wrist: a comparative study between CT-arthrography and dissection. Surg Radiol Anat 27:444–449. doi:10.1007/s00276-005-0017-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. de Poorter JJ, Obermann WR, Huizinga TWJ, Nelissen RGHH (2006) Arthrography in loosened hip prostheses. Assessment of possibilities for intra-articular therapy. Joint Bone Spine 73:684–690. doi:10.1016/j.jbspin.2005.11.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georg Matziolis.

Ethics declarations

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matziolis, G., Roehner, E., Windisch, C. et al. The volume of the human knee joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135, 1401–1403 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2272-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2272-0

Keywords

Navigation