Abstract
Background
The Brückner test is usually performed at a distance of 1 m. Due to optical reasons, the test should detect ametropia more sensitively at an extended distance. We compared the sensitivity of the test to detect unilateral ametropia at a distance of 4 m versus the traditional distance of 1 m.
Patients and methods
In this study, five blinded experienced observers (experts) performed the Brückner transillumination test on five emmetropic subjects (age 22.3 +/− 2.3 years) at a distance of 1 m which was then extended up to 4 m. Unilateral ametropia was simulated by both spherical and cylindrical lenses of −1, −2, −3, −4, and +1, +2, +3, +4 diopters in front of one eye and a plano lens in front of the other eye in a randomised order. Controls with plano lenses in front of both eyes were interspersed. The test was considered positive in case of any difference between the red reflexes of both eyes. For spherical ametropia, the procedure was repeated with 25 medical students who examined one subject each.
Results
At a distance of 1 m, unilateral myopia/hypermetropia of more than 1 diopter was detected in 78.7%/71.3% by experts and in 34.7%/53.3% by students. At 4 m, detection rates increased to 99.3%/96.0% and 98.7%/100% respectively. Rates of false positive findings for experts vs students were 3.1% vs 1.5% at 1 m and 4.0% vs 3.0% at 4 m. For unilateral astigmatism, experts’ detection rates were similar at 1 m (64.7%/70.0%) and lower at 4 m (91.7%/90.3%), depending on the astigmatism axis.
Conclusions
The sensitivity of the Brückner reflex for anisometropia improves by extension of the examination distance, especially in the hands of less experienced observers. To detect ametropia more sensitively, a test distance of 4 m is recommended.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ehrlich MI, Reinecke RD, Simons K (1983) Preschool vision screening for amblyopia and strabismus. Programs, methods guidelines. Surv Ophthalmol 28:145–163
Flynn JT (1991) Amblyopia revisited. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 28:183–201
Tychsen L (1992) Binocular vision. In: Hart WM Jr (ed) Adler’s physiology of the eye: clinical application. Mosby Yearbook, St Louis, pp 837–838
Paysse EA, Williams GC, Coats DK, Williams EA (2001) Detection of red reflex asymmetry by pediatric residents using the Brückner reflex versus the MTI photoscreener. Pediatrics 108:E74
Coats D, Jenkins R (1997) Vision assessment of the pediatric patient. Refinements, American Academy of Ophthalmology 1:1
Donahue SP (2006) Relationship between anisometropia, patient age, and the development of amblyopia. Am J Ophthalmol 142:132–140
Hillis A, Flynn JT, Hawkins BS (1983) The evolving concept of amblyopia: a challenge to epidemiologists. Am J Epidemiol 118:192–205
Brückner R (1962) Exakte Strabismusdiagnostik bei 1/2- bis 3jährigen Kindern mit einem einfachen Verfahren, dem “Durchleuchtungstest”. Ophthalmologica 144:184–198
Brückner R (1965) Praktische Übungen mit dem Durchleuchtungstest zur Frühdiagnose des Strabismus. Ophthalmologica 149:497–503
Tongue AC, Cibis GW (1981) Brückner test. Ophthalmology 88:1041–1044
Griffin JA, Cotter SA (1986) The Brückner test: evaluation of clinical usefulness. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 63:957–961
Archer SM (1988) Developmental aspects of the Brückner test. Ophthalmology 95:1096–1101
Roe LD, Guyton DL (1984) The light that leaks: Brückner and the red reflex. Surv Ophthalmol 28:655–670
von Noorden GK, Campos EC (2002) Binocular vision and ocular motility. Mosby, St Louis, p 187
Hald A (1952) Statistical theory with engineering applications. Wiley, London
Gole GM, Douglas LM (1995) Validity of the Brückner reflex in the detection of amblyopia. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 23:281–285
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gräf, M., Jung, A. The Brückner test: extended distance improves sensitivity for ametropia. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 246, 135–141 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-007-0608-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-007-0608-3