Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Brückner test: extended distance improves sensitivity for ametropia

  • Pediatrics
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The Brückner test is usually performed at a distance of 1 m. Due to optical reasons, the test should detect ametropia more sensitively at an extended distance. We compared the sensitivity of the test to detect unilateral ametropia at a distance of 4 m versus the traditional distance of 1 m.

Patients and methods

In this study, five blinded experienced observers (experts) performed the Brückner transillumination test on five emmetropic subjects (age 22.3 +/− 2.3 years) at a distance of 1 m which was then extended up to 4 m. Unilateral ametropia was simulated by both spherical and cylindrical lenses of −1, −2, −3, −4, and +1, +2, +3, +4 diopters in front of one eye and a plano lens in front of the other eye in a randomised order. Controls with plano lenses in front of both eyes were interspersed. The test was considered positive in case of any difference between the red reflexes of both eyes. For spherical ametropia, the procedure was repeated with 25 medical students who examined one subject each.

Results

At a distance of 1 m, unilateral myopia/hypermetropia of more than 1 diopter was detected in 78.7%/71.3% by experts and in 34.7%/53.3% by students. At 4 m, detection rates increased to 99.3%/96.0% and 98.7%/100% respectively. Rates of false positive findings for experts vs students were 3.1% vs 1.5% at 1 m and 4.0% vs 3.0% at 4 m. For unilateral astigmatism, experts’ detection rates were similar at 1 m (64.7%/70.0%) and lower at 4 m (91.7%/90.3%), depending on the astigmatism axis.

Conclusions

The sensitivity of the Brückner reflex for anisometropia improves by extension of the examination distance, especially in the hands of less experienced observers. To detect ametropia more sensitively, a test distance of 4 m is recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ehrlich MI, Reinecke RD, Simons K (1983) Preschool vision screening for amblyopia and strabismus. Programs, methods guidelines. Surv Ophthalmol 28:145–163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Flynn JT (1991) Amblyopia revisited. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 28:183–201

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tychsen L (1992) Binocular vision. In: Hart WM Jr (ed) Adler’s physiology of the eye: clinical application. Mosby Yearbook, St Louis, pp 837–838

    Google Scholar 

  4. Paysse EA, Williams GC, Coats DK, Williams EA (2001) Detection of red reflex asymmetry by pediatric residents using the Brückner reflex versus the MTI photoscreener. Pediatrics 108:E74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Coats D, Jenkins R (1997) Vision assessment of the pediatric patient. Refinements, American Academy of Ophthalmology 1:1

    Google Scholar 

  6. Donahue SP (2006) Relationship between anisometropia, patient age, and the development of amblyopia. Am J Ophthalmol 142:132–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hillis A, Flynn JT, Hawkins BS (1983) The evolving concept of amblyopia: a challenge to epidemiologists. Am J Epidemiol 118:192–205

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Brückner R (1962) Exakte Strabismusdiagnostik bei 1/2- bis 3jährigen Kindern mit einem einfachen Verfahren, dem “Durchleuchtungstest”. Ophthalmologica 144:184–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brückner R (1965) Praktische Übungen mit dem Durchleuchtungstest zur Frühdiagnose des Strabismus. Ophthalmologica 149:497–503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tongue AC, Cibis GW (1981) Brückner test. Ophthalmology 88:1041–1044

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Griffin JA, Cotter SA (1986) The Brückner test: evaluation of clinical usefulness. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 63:957–961

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Archer SM (1988) Developmental aspects of the Brückner test. Ophthalmology 95:1096–1101

    Google Scholar 

  13. Roe LD, Guyton DL (1984) The light that leaks: Brückner and the red reflex. Surv Ophthalmol 28:655–670

    Google Scholar 

  14. von Noorden GK, Campos EC (2002) Binocular vision and ocular motility. Mosby, St Louis, p 187

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hald A (1952) Statistical theory with engineering applications. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gole GM, Douglas LM (1995) Validity of the Brückner reflex in the detection of amblyopia. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 23:281–285

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Gräf.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gräf, M., Jung, A. The Brückner test: extended distance improves sensitivity for ametropia. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 246, 135–141 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-007-0608-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-007-0608-3

Keywords

Navigation