Abstract
Purpose
Regarding the increased need for the retention of older employees in the workforce, this study investigates whether there are main and interactive longitudinal effects of selection, optimization, compensation and working conditions according to the job demand–control model on work ability in older employees.
Methods
Longitudinal data of computer-assisted personal interviews with one follow-up after 3 years of 3961 participants (born in 1959 and 1965) of the representative German lidA cohort study was used. Multiple linear regressions were performed, analyzing prospective main and interactive effects of selection, optimization, compensation and working conditions during baseline on perceived work ability at follow-up.
Results
Regarding selection, optimization and compensation, only compensation had a positive, but weak effect on work ability. Working conditions were more strongly related to work ability: decision authority and skill discretion had independent positive and job demands had independent negative effects on work ability. One interaction effect was observed between loss-based selection and decision authority, such that they mutually enhanced their positive effects on work ability. Only few and weak interactions among the sub-strategies, selection, optimization and compensation, were observed.
Conclusions
Results indicate that especially favorable working conditions in terms of high job control and low job demands, but also compensation might help older employees to maintain work ability.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Full time, part time, marginal employment or employment-creation measure, or in other paid jobs with working time > 1 h/week.
References
Aguinis H (1995) Statistical power with moderated multiple regression in management research. J Manag 21:1141–1158. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639502100607
Alcântara MA, Sampaio RF, Assunção A, Silva FCM (2014) Work Ability: using structural equation modeling to assess the effects of aging, health and work on the population of Brazilian municipal employees. Work (Reading Mass) 49:465–472
Baltes PB, Baltes MM (1990) Psychological perspectives on successful aging: the model of selective optimization with compensation. In: Baltes PB, Baltes MM (eds) Successful aging: perspectives from the behavioral sciences. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 1–34
Baltes PB, Baltes MM, Freund AM, Lang F (1999) The measurement of selection, optimization, and compensation (SOC) by self report: technical report 1999. Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung, Berlin, Germany
Baltes BB, Wynne K, Sirabian M, Krenn D, De Lange A (2014) Future time perspective, regulatory focus, and selection, optimization, and compensation: testing a longitudinal model. J Org Behav 35:1120–1133. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1970
Becker A, Angerer P, Muller A (2017) The prevention of musculoskeletal complaints: a randomized controlled trial on additional effects of a work-related psychosocial coaching intervention compared to physiotherapy alone. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 90:357–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-017-1202-6
Bernburg M, Vitzthum K, Groneberg DA, Mache S (2016) Physicians’ occupational stress, depressive symptoms and work ability in relation to their working environment: a cross-sectional study of differences among medical residents with various specialties working in German hospitals. BMJ Open 6:e011369. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011369
Bethge M, Radoschewski FM, Muller-Fahrnow W (2009) Work stress and work ability: cross-sectional findings from the German sociomedical panel of employees. Disabil Rehabil 31:1692–1699. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280902751949
Bond FW, Bunce D (2001) Job control mediates change in a work reorganization intervention for stress reduction. J Occup Health Psychol 6:290–302
Bourbonnais R, Brisson C, Vezina M (2011) Long-term effects of an intervention on psychosocial work factors among healthcare professionals in a hospital setting. Occup Environ Med 68:479–486. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2010.055202
Cortina JM (1993) What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. J Appl Psychol 78:98
Faulkner JA, Larkin LM, Claflin DR, Brooks SV (2007) Age-related changes in the structure and function of skeletal muscles. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 34:1091–1096. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1681.2007.04752.x
Fewtrell MS et al (2008) How much loss to follow-up is acceptable in long-term randomised trials and prospective studies? Arch Dis Child 93:458–461. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2007.127316
Freund AM, Baltes PB (1998) Selection, optimization, and compensation as strategies of life management: correlations with subjective indicators of successful aging. Psychol Aging 13:531–543
Freund AM, Baltes PB (2000) The orchestration of selection, optimization, and compensation: an action-theoretical conceptualization of a theory of developmental regulation. In: Perrig WJ, Grob A (eds) Control of human behaviour, mental processes and consciousness. Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 35–58
Freund AM, Baltes PB (2002) Life-management strategies of selection, optimization and compensation: measurement by self-report and construct validity. J Pers Soc Psychol 82:642–662
Hasselhorn H-M, Freude G (2007) Der Work-ability-Index: Ein Leitfaden. Wirtschaftsverl. NW, Verlag für Neue Wiss, Bremerhaven
Hasselhorn HM et al (2014) Cohort profile: the lidA Cohort Study—a German Cohort Study on work, age, health and work participation. Int J Epidemiol 43:1736–1749
Ihle A et al (2015) The role of cognitive resources for subjective work ability and health in nursing European. J Ageing 12:131–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-014-0331-y
Ilmarinen JE (2001) Aging workers. Occup Environ Med 58:546. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.58.8.546
Ilmarinen J (2009) Work ability-a comprehensive concept for occupational health research and prevention. Scand J Work Environ Health 35:1–5
Ilmarinen J, Tuomi K (1992) Work ability of aging workers. Scand JWork Environ Health 18(Suppl 2):8–10
Ilmarinen J, Tuomi K, Klockars M (1997) Changes in the work ability of active employees over an 11-year period. Scand J Work Environ Health 23(Suppl 1):49–57
Karasek RA (1979) Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Adm Sci Q, pp 285–308
Khan SS, Singer BD, Vaughan DE (2017) Molecular and physiological manifestations and measurement of aging in humans. Aging cell 16:624–633. https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.12601
Koolhaas W, van der Klink JJ, de Boer MR, Groothoff JW, Brouwer S (2014) Chronic health conditions and work ability in the ageing workforce: the impact of work conditions, psychosocial factors and perceived health. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 87:433–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-013-0882-9
Leijon O, Balliu N, Lundin A, Vaez M, Kjellberg K, Hemmingsson T (2017) Effects of psychosocial work factors and psychological distress on self-assessed work ability: a 7-year follow-up in a general working population. Am J Ind Med 60:121–130. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22670
Maatouk I et al (2018) Healthy ageing at work—efficacy of group interventions on the mental health of nurses aged 45 and older: results of a randomised, controlled trial. PLoS One 13:e0191000. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191000
Mattila P, Elo A, Kuosma E, Kylä-Setälä E (2006) Effect of a participative work conference on psychosocial work environment and well-being. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 15:159–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320600901729
Moghimi D, Zacher H, Scheibe S, Van Yperen NW (2017) The selection, optimization, and compensation model in the work context: a systematic review and meta-analysis of two decades of research. J Org Behav 38:247–275. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2108
Montano D, Hoven H, Siegrist J (2014) Effects of organisational-level interventions at work on employees’ health: a systematic review. BMC Public Health 14:135. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-135
Müller A (2016) Die Förderung der psychischen Gesundheit von Beschäftigten - Ein Überblick über die Wirksamkeit und Erfolgsfaktoren partizipativer verhältnisbezogener Interventionen. im Betrieb Wirtschaftspsychologie 18:40–47
Müller A, Weigl M (2015) Selection, optimization, and compensation at work in relation to age. Encycl Geropsychol. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-080-3_28-1
Müller A, Weigl M, Heiden B, Glaser J, Angerer P (2012) Promoting work ability and well-being in hospital nursing: the interplay of age, job control, and successful ageing strategies. Work (Reading Mass) 41(Suppl 1):5137–5144. https://doi.org/10.3233/wor-2012-0083-5137
Müller A, Weigl M, Heiden B, Herbig B, Glaser J, Angerer P (2013) Selection, optimization, and compensation in nursing: exploration of job-specific strategies, scale development, and age-specific associations to work ability. J Adv Nurs 69:1630–1642. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12026
Müller A, Heiden B, Herbig B, Poppe F, Angerer P (2016) Improving well-being at work: a randomized controlled intervention based on selection, optimization, and compensation. J Occup Health Psychol 21:169–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039676
Müller A et al (2018) Bringing successful aging theories to occupational practice: is selective optimization with compensation trainable? Work Aging Retire 4:161–174. https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/wax033
Nübling M, Vomstein M, Nübling T, Stößel U, Hasselhorn H-M, Hofmann F (2011) Erfassung psychischer Belastungen anhand eines erprobten Fragebogens–Aufbau der COPSOQ-Datenbank. Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin, Dortmund (Projektnummer F2031)
Pohjonen T (2001) Perceived work ability of home care workers in relation to individual and work-related factors in different age groups. Occup Med (Oxford England) 51:209–217
Potočnik K (2017) Healthy ageing and well-being at work. In: Parry E, McCarthy J (eds) The palgrave handbook of age diversity and work. Palgrave Macmillan UK, London, pp 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46781-2_8
Reynolds S (1997) Psychological well-being at work: Is prevention better than cure? J Psychosom Res 43:93–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(97)00023-8
Riedel N, Müller A, Ebener M (2015) Applying strategies of selection, optimization, and compensation to maintain work ability—a psychosocial resource complementing the job demand-control model? Results from the representative lida cohort study on work, age, and health in Germany. J Occup Environ Med 57:552–561. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000000402
Salonen P, Arola H, Nygard CH, Huhtala H, Koivisto AM (2003) Factors associated with premature departure from working life among ageing food industry employees. Occup Med (Oxford England) 53:65–68. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqg012
Salthouse TA (2013) Within-cohort age-related differences in cognitive functioning. Psychol Sci 24:123–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612450893
Sell L, Bultmann U, Rugulies R, Villadsen E, Faber A, Sogaard K (2009) Predicting long-term sickness absence and early retirement pension from self-reported work ability. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 82:1133–1138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-009-0417-6
Siemsen E, Roth A, Oliveira P (2010) Common Method Bias in Regression Models With Linear, Quadratic, and Interaction Effects. Organ Res Methods 13:456–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428109351241
Solem PE (2008) Age changes in subjective work ability. Int J Ageing Later Life 3:43–70
Spector PE, Brannick MT (2009) Common method variance or measurement bias? The problem and possible solutions. In: Buchanan D, Bryman A (eds) Handbook of organizational research methods, vol 10. Sage, London, pp 346–362
Steinwede J, Kleugden M, Häring A, Schröder H (2015) Methodenbericht zur Haupterhebung lidA - leben in der Arbeit, 2. Welle. Forschungsdatenzentrum (FDZ) der Bundesagentur. für Arbeit im Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, Nürnberg
Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J, Eskelinen L, Jarvinen E, Toikkanen J, Klockars M (1991) Prevalence and incidence rates of diseases and work ability in different work categories of municipal occupations Scand. J Work Environ Health 17(Suppl 1):67–74
Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J, Jahkola A, Katajarinne L, Tulkki A (1999) Work ability index, 2nd edn. Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki
van de Vijfeijke H et al (2013) Differential effects of mental and physical health and coping style on work ability: a 1-year follow-up study among aging workers. J Occup Environ Med Am Coll Occup Environ Med 55:1238–1243. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e3182a2a5e1
van den Berg TI, Elders LA, de Zwart BC, Burdorf A (2009) The effects of work-related and individual factors on the Work Ability Index: a systematic review. Occup Environ Med 66:211–220. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2008.039883
von Bonsdorff ME, von Bonsdorff MB, Zhou ZE, Kauppinen M, Miettinen M, Rantanen T, Vanhala S (2014) Organizational justice, selection, optimization with compensation, and nurses’ work ability. J Occup Environ Med Am Coll Occup Environ Med 56:326–330. https://doi.org/10.1097/jom.0000000000000102
Weigl M, Müller A, Hornung S, Zacher H, Angerer P (2013) The moderating effects of job control and selection, optimization, and compensation strategies on the age-work ability relationship. Jo Org Behav 34:607–628
Wiese BS, Freund AM, Baltes PB (2000) Selection, optimization, and compensation: an action-related approach to work and partnership. J Vocat Behav 57:273–300
Wiese BS, Freund AM, Baltes PB (2002) Subjective career success and emotional well-being: longitudinal predictive power of selection, optimization and compensation. J Vocat Behav 60:321–335
Wirth H, Gresch C, Müller W, Pollak R, Weiss F (2009) Validating the ESeC-scheme as operationalization of social class: The case of Germany vol Arbeitspapiere - Mannheimer Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung: 119. Mannheim
Yeung DY, Fung HH (2009) Aging and work: How do SOC strategies contribute to job performance across adulthood? Psychol Aging 24:927–940
Zacher H, Chan F, Bakker AB, Demerouti E (2015) Selection, optimization, and compensation strategies: Interactive effects on daily work engagement. J Vocat Behav 87:101–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.12.008
Acknowledgements
The research was financed in the frame of the lidA study by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) under the Project Numbers 01 ER 0806, 01 ER 0825, 01 ER 0826, 01 ER 0827.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Research involving human participants and/or animals
The research project was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Wuppertal (December 5th, 2008).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Appendix
Appendix
Example items for life management strategies (according to Baltes et al. 1999): The participants were asked to choose between two mutually exclusive life management strategy statements. Here, the first statement always represents the respective SOC strategy, the second one representing an alternative non-SOC option, handled as a distractor.
Elective selection: ‘When you think about pursuing your work goals, how do you proceed?’
-
‘I concentrate all my energy on few things.’
-
‘I divide my energy among many things.’
Loss-based selection: ‘When things don’t go as well as before, how do you proceed?’
-
‘I choose one or two important goals.’
-
‘I still try to keep all my goals.’
Optimization: ‘When you think about achieving your work goals, how do you proceed?’
-
‘I keep working on what I have planned until I succeed.’
-
‘When I do not succeed right away at what I want to do, I don’t try other possibilities for very long.’
Compensation: ‘When things don’t go as well as they used to, how do you proceed?’
-
‘I keep trying other ways until I can achieve the same result I used to.’
-
‘I accept it.’
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weber, J., Müller, A., Stiller, M. et al. Prognostic effects of selection, optimization and compensation strategies on work ability: results from the representative lidA cohort study on work, age, and health in Germany. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 91, 1061–1071 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-018-1348-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-018-1348-x