Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Laparoscopic colectomy for recurrent and complicated diverticulitis: a prospective study of 396 patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

It was the aim of this prospective study to evaluate the outcome of laparoscopic surgery for diverticular disease.

Methods

All patients who underwent elective laparoscopic colectomy for diverticular disease within a 10-year period were prospectively entered into a PC database registry. Indications for laparoscopic surgery were acute complicated diverticulitis (Hinchey stages I and IIa), chronically recurrent diverticulitis, sigmoid stenosis or outlet obstruction caused by chronic diverticulitis. Surgical procedures (sigmoid and anterior resection, left colectomy and resection rectopexy) included intracorporeal dissection and colorectal anastomosis. Parameters studied included age, gender, stage of disease, procedure, duration of surgery, intraoperative technical variables, transfusion requirements, conversion rate, total complication rate including major (requiring re-operation), minor (conservative treatment) and late-onset (post-discharge) complication rates, stay on ICU, hospitalisation, mortality, and recurrence. For objective evaluation, only laparoscopically completed procedures were analysed. Comparative outcome analysis was performed with respect to stage of disease and experience.

Results

A total of 396 patients underwent laparoscopic colectomy. Conversion rate was 6.8% (n=27), so that laparoscopic completion rate was 93.2% (n=369). Most common reasons for conversion were directly related to the inflammatory process, abscess or fistulas. The most common procedure was sigmoid resection (n=279), followed by anterior resection (n=36) and left colectomy (n=29). Total complication rate was 18.4% (n=68). Major complication rate was 7.6% (n=28), whereas the most common complication requiring re-operation was haemorrhage in 3.3% (n=12). Anastomotic leakage occurred in 1.6% (n=6). Minor complications were noted in 10.7% (n=40), late-onset complications occurred in 2.7% (n=10). Mortality was 0.5% (n=2). Mean duration of surgery was 193 (range 75–400) min, return to normal diet was completed after 6.8 (range 3–19) days. Mean hospital stay was 11.8 (range 4–71) days. No recurrence of diverticulitis occurred.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic surgery for diverticular disease is safe, feasible and effective. Therefore, laparoscopic colectomy has replaced open resection as standard surgery for recurrent and complicated diverticulitis at our institution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bruch HP, Herold A, Schiedeck T, Schwandner O (1999) Laparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse and outlet obstruction. Dis Colon Rectum 42:1189–1194

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bruch HP, Schiedeck THK, Schwandner O (1999) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a five-year experience. Dig Surg 16:45–54

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schiedeck TH, Schwandner O, Bruch HP (1998) Laparoscopic sigmoid resection in diverticulitis (in German). Chirurg 69:846–853

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gervaz P, Pikarsky A, Utech M, Secic M, Efron J, Belin B, Jain A, Wexner SD (2001) Converted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 15:827–832

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Le Moine MC, Fabre JM, Vacher C, Navarro F, Picot MC, Domergue J (2003) Factors and consequences of conversion in laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease. Br J Surg 90:232–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Marusch F, Gastinger I, Schneider C, Scheidbach H, Konradt J, Bruch HP, Koehler L, Baerlehner E, Koeckerling F, Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group (LCSSG) (2001) Importance of conversion for results obtained with laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 44:207–214

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schwandner O, Schiedeck THK, Bruch HP (1999) The role of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: do predictive factors exist? Surg Endosc 13:151–156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Germer CT, Buhr HJ (2002) Sigmoid diverticulitis. Surgical indications and timing (in German). Chirurg 73:681–689

    Google Scholar 

  9. Koehler L, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E (1999) Diagnosis and treatment of diverticular disease: results of a consensus development conference. The Scientific Committee of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc 13:430–436

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Makela J, Vuolio S, Kiviniemi H, Laitinen S (1998) Natural history of diverticular disease: when to operate? Dis Colon Rectum 41:1523–1528

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Poulin EC, Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Seshadri PA (2000) Should enteric fistulas from Crohn’s disease or diverticulitis be treated laparoscopically or by open surgery? A matched cohort study. Dis Colon Rectum 43:621–626

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hinchey EJ, Schaal PG, Richards GK (1978) Treatment of perforated diverticular disease of the colon. Adv Surg 12:85–109

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chautems RC, Ambrosetti P, Ludwig A, Mermillod B, Morel P, Soravia C (2002) Long-term follow-up after first acute episode of sigmoid diverticulitis: is surgery mandatory? A prospective study of 118 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 45:962–966

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Makela J, Kiviniemi H, Laitinen S (2002) Prevalence of perforated sigmoid diverticulitis is increasing. Dis Colon Rectum 45:955–961

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bergamaschi R, Arnaud JP (1998) Anastomosis level and specimen length in surgery for uncomplicated diverticulitis of the sigmoid. Surg Endosc 12:1149–1151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Thaler K, Baig MK, Berho M, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Arnaud JP, Wexner SD, Bergamaschi R (2003) Determinants of recurrence after sigmoid resection for uncomplicated diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 46:385–388

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Berthou JC, Charbonneau P (1999) Elective laparoscopic management of sigmoid diverticulitis. Results in a series of 110 patients. Surg Endosc 13:457–460

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bouillot JL, Aouad K, Badawy A, Alamowitch B, Alexandre JH (1998) Elective laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for diverticular disease. A prospective study in 50 patients. Surg Endosc 12:1393–1396

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bruce CJ, Coller JA, Murray JJ, Schoetz DJ Jr, Roberts PL, Rusir LC (1996) Laparoscopic resection for diverticular disease. Dis Colon Rectum 39 [Suppl]:S1–6

    Google Scholar 

  20. Eijsbouts QA, Cuesta MA, de Brauw LM, Sietses C (1997) Elective laparoscopic-assisted sigmoid resection for diverticular disease. Surg Endosc 11:750–753

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Franklin MEJ, Dorman JP, Jacobs M, Plasencia G (1997) Is laparoscopic surgery applicable to complicated colonic diverticular disease? Surg Endosc 11:1021–1025

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Koeckerling F, Schneider C, Reymond MA, Scheidbach H, Scheuerlein H, Konradt J, Bruch HP, Zornig C, Koehler L, Baerlehner E, Kuthe A, Szinicz G, Richter HA, Hohenberger W, Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group (1999) Laparoscopic resection of sigmoid diverticulitis. Results of a multicenter study. Surg Endosc 13:567–571

    Google Scholar 

  23. Koehler L, Rixen D, Troidl H (1998) Laparoscopic colorectal resection for diverticulitis. Int J Colorectal Dis 13:43–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sher ME, Agachan F, Bortul M, Nogueras JJ, Weiss EG, Wexner SD (1997) Laparoscopic surgery for diverticulitis. Surg Endosc 11:264–267

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sirisier F (1999) Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for diverticular sigmoiditis. A single-surgeon prospective study of 65 patients. Surg Endosc 13:811–813

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Smadja C, Sbai Idrissi M, Tahrat M, Vons C, Bobocescu E, Baillet P, Franco D (1999) Elective laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis. Results of a prospective study. Surg Endosc 13:645–648

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Stevenson ARL, Stitz R, Lumley J, Fielding G (1998) Laparoscopically assisted anterior resection for diverticular disease: follow-up of 100 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 227:335–342

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Vargas HD, Ramirez RT, Hoffman GC, Hubbard GW, Gould RJ, Wohlgemuth SD, Ruffin WK, Hatter JE, Kolm P (2000) Defining the role of laparoscopic-assisted sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1726–1731

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bergamaschi R, Tuech JJ, Cervi C, Arnaud JP (2000) Re-establish pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic-assisted sigmoid resection? Randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 43:771–774

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bergamaschi R, Tuech JJ, Pessaux P, Arnaud JP (2000) Intracorporeal vs laparoscopic-assisted resection for uncomplicated diverticulitis of the sigmoid. Surg Endosc 14:520–523

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bouillot JL, Berthou JC, Champault G, Meyer C, Arnaud JP, Samama G, Collet D, Bressler P, Gainant A, Delaitre B (2002) Elective laparoscopic colonic resection for diverticular disease. Results of a multicenter study in 179 patients. Surg Endosc 16:1320–1323

    Google Scholar 

  32. Liberman MA, Phillips EH, Carroll BJ, Fallas M, Rosenthal R (1996) Laparoscopic colectomy vs traditional colectomy for diverticulitis. Outcome and costs. Surg Endosc 10:15–18

    Google Scholar 

  33. Menenakos E, Hahnloser D, Nassiopoulos K, Chanson C, Sinclair V, Petropoulos P (2003) Laparoscopic surgery for fistulas that complicate diverticular disease. Langenbecks Arch Surg 388:189–193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Senagore AJ, Duepree HJ, Delaney CP, Brady KM, Fazio VW (2003) Results of a standardized technique and postoperative care plan for laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: a 30-month experience. Dis Colon Rectum 46:503–509

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Senagore AJ, Duepree HJ, Delaney CP, Dissanaike S, Brady KM, Fazio VW (2002) Cost structure of laparoscopic and open sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: similarities and differences. Dis Colon Rectum 45:485–490

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Dwivedi A, Chahin F, Agrawal S, Chau WY, Tootla A, Tootla F, Silva YJ (2002) Laparoscopic colectomy vs open colectomy for sigmoid diverticular disease. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1309–1314

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Faynsod M, Stamos MJ, Arnell T, Borden C, Udani S, Vargas H (2000) A case–control study of laparoscopic vs open sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis. Am Surg 66:841–843

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lawrence DM, Pasquale MD, Wasser TE (2003) Laparoscopic versus open sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis. Am Surg 69:499–503

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Trebuchet G, Lechaux D, Lecalve JL (2002) Laparoscopic left colon resection for diverticular disease. Surg Endosc 16:18–21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Tuech JJ, Regenet N, Hennekinne S, Pessaux P, Bergamaschi R, Arnaud JP (2001) Laparoscopic colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis in obese and nonobese patients: a prospective comparative study. Surg Endosc 15:1427–1430

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Tuech JJ, Pessaux P, Rouge C, Regenet N, Bergamaschi R, Arnaud JP (2000) Laparoscopic vs open colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis: a prospective study in the elderly. Surg Endosc 14:1031–1033

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Mrs. C. Killaitis for processing the prospective PC database registry and for statistical evaluation. The work was supported by a grant from Stiftung Coloplast, Hamburg, Germany.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck Campus, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Luebeck, Germany

    O. Schwandner, S. Farke, F. Fischer, C. Eckmann, T. H. K. Schiedeck & H.-P. Bruch

Authors
  1. O. Schwandner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Farke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. F. Fischer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. C. Eckmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. T. H. K. Schiedeck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. H.-P. Bruch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. Schwandner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schwandner, O., Farke, S., Fischer, F. et al. Laparoscopic colectomy for recurrent and complicated diverticulitis: a prospective study of 396 patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg 389, 97–103 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-003-0454-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-003-0454-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation