Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Staging laparoscopy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma in 100 patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Accurate preoperative radiological staging of hilar cholangiocarcinoma remains difficult, and a number of patients are found to have irresectable advanced tumours or occult metastases at exploration. Staging laparoscopy can improve the detection of irresectable disease, avoiding unnecessary laparotomy. This study examines the role of staging laparoscopy in hilar cholangiocarcinoma, with a focus on yield over different time periods and identification of preoperative factors increasing the risk of irresectable disease.

Methods

Retrospective case note review of all patients undergoing staging laparoscopy for radiologically resectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma, identified from the hepatobiliary multidisciplinary team database, was performed.

Results

One hundred consecutive patients underwent staging laparoscopy between 1998 and 2011. Of these, 34 patients were found to be irresectable due to metastatic disease, and 11, due to extensive local disease. Fifty patients proceeded to exploratory laparotomy following staging laparoscopy, and 36 % (18/50) of whom were found to have irresectable disease: 12 patients due to advanced local disease and 6 patients due to metastases. The overall yield of laparoscopy was 45 %, and the accuracy was 71 %.

There was no significant difference in age, preoperative bilirubin, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, Ca19-9 levels or T stage between patients with resectable disease and with irresectable disease on laparoscopy. There was also no change in the yield of laparoscopy over time, despite advances in radiological imaging.

Conclusion

In this series, staging laparoscopy avoided unnecessary laparotomy in 45 % of patients with radiologically resectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma. No factor was able to predict positive yield, and therefore, all patients with potentially resectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma should undergo staging laparoscopy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weber SM, DeMatteo RP, Fong Y, Blumgart LH, Jarnagin WR (2002) Staging laparoscopy in patients with extrahepatic biliary carcinoma. Analysis of 100 patients. Ann Surg 235:392–399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ruys AT, Busch OR, Gouma DJ, van Gulik TM (2011) Staging laparoscopy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: is it still worthwhile? Ann Surg Oncol 18:2647–2653

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Burke EC, Jarnagin WR, Hochwald SN, Pisters PWT, Fong Y, Blumgart LH (1998) Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: patterns of spread, the importance of hepatic resection for curative operation, and a presurgical clinical staging system. Ann Surg 228:385–394

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gomez D, Morris-Stiff G, Toogood GJ, Lodge JP, Prasad KR (2008) Impact of systemic inflammation on outcome following resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol 97:513–518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tilleman EH, de Castro SM, Busch OR, Bemelman WA, van Gulik TM, Obertop H et al (2002) Diagnostic laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasound for staging of patients with malignant proximal bile duct obstruction. J Gastrointest Surg 6:426–30, discussion 430–1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Connor S, Barron E, Wigmore SJ, Madhavan KK, Parks RW, Garden OJ (2005) The utility of laparoscopic assessment in the preoperative staging of suspected hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 9:476–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Goere D, Wagholikar GD, Pessaux P, Carrere N, Sibert A, Vilgrain V et al (2006) Utility of staging laparoscopy in subsets of biliary cancers: laparoscopy is a powerful diagnostic tool in patients with intrahepatic and gallbladder carcinoma. Surg Endosc 20:721–725

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Miyazaki M, Kato A, Ito H, Kimura F, Shimizu H, Ohtsuka M et al (2007) Combined vascular resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: does it work or not? Surgery 141:581–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ruys AT, van Beem BE, Engelbrecht MR, Bipat S, Stoker J, van Gulik TM (2012) Radiological staging in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Radiol 85:1255–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fritshcer-Ravens A, Bohuslavizki KH, Broering DC, Jenicke L, Schafer H, Buchert R et al (2001) FDG PET in the diagnosis of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Nucl Med Commun 22:1277–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li J, Kuelh H, Grabellus F, Muller SP, Radunz S, Antoch G et al (2008) Preoperative assessment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma by dual modality PET/CT. J Surg Oncol 98:438–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ruys AT, Bennink RJ, van Westreenen HL, Engelbrecht MR, Busch OR, Gouma DJ et al (2011) FDG-positron emission tomography/computed tomography and standardized uptake value in the primary diagnosis and staging of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. HPB (Oxford) 13:256–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam D. Barlow.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barlow, A.D., Garcea, G., Berry, D.P. et al. Staging laparoscopy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma in 100 patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg 398, 983–988 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-013-1104-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-013-1104-3

Keywords

Navigation