Skip to main content
Log in

Array CGH detection of a cryptic deletion in a complex chromosome rearrangement

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Human Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Balanced complex chromosome rearrangements (CCR) are extremely rare in humans. They are usually ascertained either by abnormal phenotype or reproductive failure in carriers. These abnormalities are attributed to disruption of genes at the breakpoints, position effect or cryptic imbalances in the genome. However, little is known about possible imbalances at the junction points. We report here a patient with a CCR involving three chromosomes (2;10;11) and eight breakpoints. The patient presented with behavioural problems as the sole phenotypic abnormality. The rearrangement, which is apparently balanced in G-banding and multicolour FISH, was shown by genomic array analysis to include a deletion of 0.15–1.5 Mb associated with one of the breakpoints. To explain the formation of this rearrangement through the smallest possible number of breakage-and-reunion events, one has to assume that the breaks have not occurred simultaneously, but in a temporal order within the span of a single cell division. We demonstrate that array comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) is a useful complementary tool to cytogenetic analysis for detecting and mapping cryptic imbalances associated with chromosome rearrangement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1a–e
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4a–d

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Batanian JR, Eswara MS (1998) De novo apparently balanced complex chromosome rearrangement (CCR) involving chromosomes 4, 18, and 21 in a girl with mental retardation: report and review. Am J Med Genet 78:44–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Batista DA, Pai GS, Stetten G (1994) Molecular analysis of a complex chromosomal rearrangement and a review of familial cases. Am J Med Genet 53:255–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg I, Squire M, Menzel C, Stout K, Morgan D, Willatt L, O’Brien PC, Ferguson-Smith MA, Ropers HH, Tommerup N, Kalscheuer VM, Sargan DR (2002) A cryptic deletion of 2q35 including part of the PAX3 gene detected by breakpoint mapping in a child with autism and a de novo 2;8 translocation. J Med Genet 39:391–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter NP, Fiegler H, Piper J (2002) Comparative analysis of comparative genomic hybridization microarray technologies: report of a workshop sponsored by the Wellcome Trust. Cytometry 49:43–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiegler H, Carr P, Douglas EJ, Burford DC, Hunt S, Smith J, Vetrie D, Gorman P, Tomlinson IP, Carter NP (2003) DNA microarrays for comparative genomic hybridization based on DOP-PCR amplification of BAC and PAC clones. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 36:361–374

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson AC, Kageyama R, Popescu NC, Pastan I (1992) Expression and chromosomal localization of the gene for the human transcriptional repressor GCF. J Biol Chem 267:1689–1694

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce CA, Cabral de Almeida JC, Santa Rose AA, Correia P, Moraes L, Bastos E, Llerena J Jr (1999) A de novo complex chromosomal rearrangement with nine breakpoints characterized by FISH in a boy with mild mental retardation, developmental delay, short stature and microcephaly. Clin Genet 56:86–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Knijnenburg J, Szuhai K, Giltay J, Molenaar L, Sloos W, Poot M, Tanke HJ, Rosenberg C (2005) Insights from genomic microarrays into structural chromosome rearrangements. Am J Med Genet 132:36–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Becker LA, Depinet TW, Haren JM, Kurtz CL, Robin NH, Cassidy SB, Wolff DJ, Schwartz S (1998) Molecular characterization and delineation of subtle deletions in de novo “balanced” chromosomal rearrangements. Hum Genet 103:173–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledbetter DH, Rich DC, O’Connell P, Leppert M, Carey JC (1989) Precise localization of NF1 to 17q11.2 by balanced translocation. Am J Hum Genet 44:20–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitelman F (ed) (1995) ISCN—An international system for human cytogenetic nomenclature. Karger, Basel

  • Pai GS, Thomas GH, Mahoney W, Migeon BR (1980) Complex chromosome rearrangements. Report of a new case and literature review. Clin Genet 18:436–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelan MC, Blackburn W, Rogers RC, Crawford EC, Cooley NR Jr, Schrock E, Ning Y, Ried T (1998) FISH analysis of a complex chromosome rearrangement involving nine breakpoints on chromosomes 6, 12, 14 and 16. Prenat Diagn 18:1174–1180

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitz F, Montavon T, Monso-Hinard C, Morris M, Ventruto ML, Antonarakis S, Ventruto V, Duboule D (2002) A t(2;8) balanced translocation with breakpoints near the human HOXD complex causes mesomelic dysplasia and vertebral defects. Genomics 79:493–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanke HJ, Wiegant J, van Gijlswijk RP, Bezrookove V, Pattenier H, Heetebrij RJ, Talman EG, Raap AK, Vrolijk J (1999) New strategy for multi-colour fluorescence in situ hybridisation: COBRA: combined binary ratio labelling. Eur J Hum Genet 7:2–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Zatz M, Vianna-Morgante AM, Campos P, Diament AJ (1981) Translocation (X;6) in a female with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: implications for the localisation of the DMD locus. J Med Genet 18:442–447

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by the “Doelmatigheid” (cost-efficiency) grant from the Leiden University Medical Center (2002/2003), and CR by FAPESP/CEPID (98/14254-2). We thank Peter Pearson and Angela Vianna-Morgante for critical review and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carla Rosenberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosenberg, C., Knijnenburg, J., Chauffaille, M.d.L. et al. Array CGH detection of a cryptic deletion in a complex chromosome rearrangement. Hum Genet 116, 390–394 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-004-1248-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-004-1248-x

Keywords

Navigation