Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of disturbance and enemy exclusion on performance of an invasive species, common ragweed, in its native range

  • Plant-Animal interactions - Original Paper
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) is an abundant weed in its native North America, despite supporting a wide range of natural enemies. Here, we tested whether these enemies have significant impacts on the performance of this plant in its native range. We excluded enemies from the three principal life-history stages (seed, seedling, and adult) of this annual in a series of field experiments; at the adult stage, we also manipulated soil disturbance and conspecific density. We then measured the consequences of these treatments for growth, survival, and reproduction. Excluding fungi and vertebrate granivores from seeds on the soil surface did not increase germination relative to control plots. Seedling survivorship was only slightly increased by the exclusion of molluscs and other herbivores. Insecticide reduced damage to leaves of adult plants, but did not improve growth or reproduction. Growth and survivorship of adults were strongly increased by disturbance, while higher conspecific density reduced performance in disturbed plots. These results indicate ragweed is insensitive to attack by many of its natural enemies, helping to explain its native-range success. In addition, they suggest that even though ragweed lost most of its insect folivores while invading Europe, escape from these enemies is unlikely to have provided a significant demographic advantage; instead, disturbance is likely to have been a much more important factor in its invasion. Escape from enemies should not be assumed to explain the success of exotic species unless improved performance also can be demonstrated; native-range studies can help achieve this goal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allard HA (1943) The North American ragweeds and their occurrence in other parts of the world. Science 98:292–294

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baskin JM, Baskin CC (1980) Ecophysiology of secondary dormancy in seeds of Ambrosia artemisiifolia. Ecology 61:475–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassett IJ, Crompton CW (1975) The biology of Canadian weeds. 11. Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. and Ambrosia psilostachya DC. Can J Plant Sci 2:463–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassett IJ, Terasmae J (1962) Ragweeds, Ambrosia species, in Canada and their history in postglacial time. Can J Bot 40:141–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazzaz FA (1968) Succession on abandoned fields in the Shawnee Hills, southern Illinois. Ecology 49:924–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazzaz FA (1974) Ecophysiology of Ambrosia artemisiifolia: a successional dominant. Ecology 55:112–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazzaz FA, Mezga DM (1973) Primary productivity and microenvironment in an Ambrosia dominated old-field. Am Midl Nat 90:70–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaney CS, Kotanen PM (2001) Post-dispersal losses to seed predators: an experimental comparison of native and exotic old field plants. Can J Bot 79:284–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blossey B, Nötzold R (1995) Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants: a hypothesis. J Ecol 83:887–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolker BM (2008) Ecological models and data in R. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Chauvel B, Dessaint F, Cardinal-Legrand C, Bretagnolle F (2006) The historical spread of Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. in France from herbarium records. J Biogeog 33:665–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colautti RI, Ricciardi A, Grigorovich IA, MacIsaac HJ (2004) Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis? Ecol Lett 7:721–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (2007) The R book. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlen J (2003) Fitness components versus total demographic effects: evaluating herbivore impacts on a perennial herb. Am Nat 162:796–810

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elton CS (1958) The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster MM, Vitousek PM, Randolph PA (1980) The effects of ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) on nutrient cycling in a 1st-year old-field. Am Midl Nat 103:106–113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fumanal B, Girod C, Fried G, Bretagnolle F, Chauvel B (2008) Can the large ecological amplitude of Ambrosia artemisiifolia explain its invasive success in France? Weed Res 48:349–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funk DJ, Futuyma D, Ortí G, Meyer A (1995) A history of host associations and evolutionary diversification for Ophraella (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): new evidence from mitochondrial DNA. Evolution 49:1008–1017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Futuyma DJ, McCafferty SS (1990) Phylogeny and the evolution of host plant associations in the leaf beetle genus Ophraella (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Evolution 44:1885–1913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genton BJ, Kotanen PM, Cheptou P-O, Adolphe C, Shykoff JA (2005a) Enemy release but no evolutionary loss of defence during ragweed invasion of France: an inter-continental reciprocal transplant experiment. Oecologia 146:404–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Genton BJ, Shykoff JA, Giraud T (2005b) High genetic diversity in French invasive populations of common ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia, as a result of multiple sources of introduction. Mol Ecol 14:4275–4285

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guo Q (2006) Intercontinental biotic invasions: what can we learn from native populations and habitats? Biol Inv 8:1451–1459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern SL, Underwood N (2006) Approaches for testing herbivore effects on plant population dynamics. J Appl Ecol 43:922–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison SK, Regnier EE (2003) Postdispersal predation of giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) seed in no-tillage corn. Weed Sci 51:955–964

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hierro LJ, Maron JL, Callaway RM (2005) A biogeographical approach to plant invasions: the importance of studying exotics in their introduced and native range. J Ecol 93:5–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill BHC, Silvertown J (1997) Higher-order interaction between molluscs and sheep affecting seedling numbers in grassland. Acta Oecol 18:587–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Igrc J, Deloach CJ, Zlof V (1995) Release and establishment of Zygogramma suturalis F (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) in Croatia for control of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L). Biol Control 5:203–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin DL, Aarssen LW (1996) Testing for cost of apical dominance in vegetation: a field study of three species. Ann Bot Fenn 33:123–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane RM, Crawley MJ (2002) Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol Evol 17:164–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk RE (1995) Experimental design: procedures for the behavioural sciences, 3rd edn. Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiss L (2007) Why is biological control of common ragweed, the most allergenic weed in Eastern Europe, still only a hope? In: Vincent C, Goettel MS, Lazarovits G (eds) Biological control: a global perspective. CABI, Wallingford, pp 80–91

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kosola KR, Gross KL (1999) Resource competition and suppression of plants colonizing early successional old fields. Oecologia 118:69–75

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Stiling P (2006) Testing the enemy release hypothesis: a review and meta-analysis. Biol Inv 8:1535–1545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKay J, Kotanen PM (2008) Local escape of an invasive plant, common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.), from above-ground and below-ground enemies in its native area. J Ecol 96:1152–1161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manson RH, Stiles EW (1998) Links between microhabitat preferences and seed predation by small mammals in old fields. Oikos 82:37–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maron JL, Crone E (2006) Herbivory: effects on plant abundance, distribution and population growth. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:2575–2584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maron JL, Vilà M (2001) When do herbivores affect plant invasion? Evidence for the natural enemies and biotic resistance hypotheses. Oikos 95:361–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAndrews JH (1988) Human disturbance of North American forests and grasslands: the fossil pollen record. In: Huntley B, Webb T III (eds) Vegetation history. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 673–697

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell CE, Agrawal AA, Bever JD, Gilbert GS, Hufbauer RA, Klironomos JN, Maron JL, Morris WF, Parker IM, Power AG, Seabloom EW, Torchin ME, Vázquez DP (2006) Biotic interactions and plant invasions. Ecol Lett 9:726–740

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paquin V, Aarssen LW (2004) Allometric gender allocation in Ambrosia artemisiifolia (Asteraceae) has adaptive plasticity. Am J Bot 91:430–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Raynal DJ, Bazzaz FA (1975) Interference of winter annuals with Ambrosia artemisiifolia in early successional fields. Ecology 56:35–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reznik SY, Belokobyl’skiy SA, Lobanov AL (1994) Weed and herbivorous insect population densities at the broad spatial scale: Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. and Zygogramma suturalis F. (Col., Chrysomelidae). J Appl Entomol 118:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer M, Kotanen PM (2003) The influence of soil moisture on losses of buried seeds to fungi. Acta Oecol 24:255–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schüder I, Port G, Bennison J (2003) Barriers, repellents and antifeedants for slug and snail control. Crop Prot 22:1033–1038

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharvelle EG (1961) The nature and uses of modern fungicides. Burgess, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1994) Biometry: the principles and practices of statistics in biological research, 3rd edn. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Teshler MP, DiTommaso A, Gagnon JA, Watson AK (2002) Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. common ragweed (Asteraceae). In: Mason PG, Huber JT (eds) Biological control programs in Canada 1981–2000. CABI, Wallingford, pp 290–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Throop HL (2005) Nitrogen deposition and herbivory affect biomass production and allocation in an annual plant. Oikos 111:91–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torchin ME, Mitchell CE (2004) Parasites, pathogens, and invasions by plants and animals. Front Ecol Environ 2:183–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torgeson DC (1969) Fungicides: an advanced treatise, vol II. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamanaka T, Tanaka K, Otuka A, Bjørnstad ON (2007) Detecting spatial interactions in the ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) and the ragweed beetle (Ophraella communa LeSage) populations. Ecol Res 22:185–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziska LH, George K, Frenz DA (2007) Establishment and persistence of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) in disturbed soil as a function of an urban-rural macro-environment. Glob Chang Biol 13:266–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

M. Saunders, K.A. Judge, L.J. Robson, M. Lerdau, and two anonymous reviewers for useful comments. A. Simonsen, R. Dinnage, Z. Burivalova, R. MacKenzie, A.M. Petersen, V. Pham and especially K. Kostyukova for helpful field work. J. Stinchcombe and S.C.H. Barrett for advice, Art Weis and KSR for logistical support. This work would have been impossible without the donation of Koffler Scientific Reserve to the University of Toronto by the Koffler family. This work was supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada PGS to A.A.M.M. and a Discovery Grant to P.M.K. These experiments comply with all local laws.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter M. Kotanen.

Additional information

Communicated by Manuel Lerdau.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 81 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MacDonald, A.A.M., Kotanen, P.M. The effects of disturbance and enemy exclusion on performance of an invasive species, common ragweed, in its native range. Oecologia 162, 977–986 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-009-1557-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-009-1557-9

Keywords

Navigation