Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The laparoscopic experience of surgical graduates in the United States

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Although laparoscopic surgery has become widespread during the past decade, no systematic study of the training needs exists. To obtain guidance for planning, we analyzed the national resident operative experience during the past 8 years. Methods: The laparoscopic experiences of all surgical residents graduating between 1994 and 2001 were subjected to regression analysis. The laparoscopic volume of each trainee and change in ratio of laparoscopic/open operation over time were used to estimate the growth of individual laparoscopic operations in training programs. Results: Laparoscopic surgery constituted only 5.7% of a trainee’s total surgical experience in 1994, but comprised 13% by 2001. A resident completing training in 1994 performed 53 laparoscopic operations, of which 79% (42) were cholecystectomies. By 2001, a graduate performed 126 laparoscopic operations, of which 68% (86) were cholecystectomies. During the interim, most laparoscopic operations exhibited growth. Trainee experience in some newer operations has also increased steadily but at a much slower rate. Conclusions: This descriptive statistical survey of training experience yields a comprehensive picture of the laparoscopic capability of the young surgeon. The growth potential of some newer operations has also been measured. Using these data, guidelines can be drawn as to which operation programs should focus resources on training residents. Since competence depends on exposure, residency training alone may not provide sufficient depth to allow recent graduates to perform the newer operations independently.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. www.acgme.org

  2. AY Chen J Daley TN Pappas WG Henderson SF Khuri (1998) ArticleTitleGrowing use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study: effects on volume, patient selection, and selected outcomes. Ann Surg 227 12–24 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199801000-00003 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7gsFymsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9445105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. JJ Escarce W Chen JS Schwartz (1995) ArticleTitleFalling cholecystectomy thresholds since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Med Assoc 273 1581–1585 Occurrence Handle10.1001/jama.273.20.1581 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqB28vlt1Q%3D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. MA Liberman K Greason (1999) ArticleTitleResidency training in advanced laparoscopic surgery: how are we doing? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 9 87–90 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00019509-199904000-00002 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FjtFyquw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11757550

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. B Navez F Penninckx (1999) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic training: results of a Belgian survey in trainees. Belgian Group for Endoscopic Surgery. Acta Chir Belg 99 53–58 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3otV2qug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10352732

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. R Orlando JC Russell J Lynch A Mattie (1993) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy. A statewide experience. The Connecticut Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Registry. Arch Surg 128 494–499 Occurrence Handle8489381

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. DW Rattner KN Apelgren WS Eubanks (2001) ArticleTitleThe need for training opportunities in advanced laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 15 1066–1070 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnotV2jsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11727071

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. JC Rosser Jr M Murayama NH Gabriel (2000) ArticleTitleMinimally invasive surgical training for the twenty-first century. Surg Clin North Am 80 1607–1624

    Google Scholar 

  9. InstitutionalAuthorNameSociety of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (1994) ArticleTitleFramework for post-residency surgical education and training—a SAGES guideline. Surg Endosc 8 1137–1142

    Google Scholar 

  10. InstitutionalAuthorNameSociety of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (1998) ArticleTitleIntegrating advanced laparoscopy into surgical residency training. Surg Endosc 12 374–376

    Google Scholar 

  11. CA Steiner EB Bass MA Talamini et al. (1994) ArticleTitleSurgical rates and operative mortality for open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Maryland. N Engl J Med 330 403–408 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJM199402103300607 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuC3M7nsVI%3D Occurrence Handle8284007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Huron Hospital, Cleveland Clinic Health System, 13951 Terrace Road, Cleveland, OH 44112, USA

    R. Chung, Q. Pham, L. Wojtasik & V. Chari

  2. Robinson Memorial Hospital, 6847 North Chestnut Street, Ravenna, OH 44266, USA

    P. Chen

Authors
  1. R. Chung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Q. Pham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. L. Wojtasik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. V. Chari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. P. Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Chung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chung, R., Pham, Q., Wojtasik, L. et al. The laparoscopic experience of surgical graduates in the United States. Surg Endosc 17, 1792–1795 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-8922-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-8922-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation