Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Laparoscopic colorectal resection does not reduce incisional hernia rates when compared with open colorectal resection

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery has been reported to have some advantages compared with open surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of incisional hernias after elective open colorectal resection versus laparoscopic colorectal resection.

Methods

The study group consisted of 104 patients who underwent elective colorectal resection or reversal of a Hartmann’s procedure between November 2003 and March 2005. Baseline data were prospectively recorded on all patients. All were examined by an independent observer for evidence of incisional hernia after they had reached a minimum follow up of one year.

Results

At a median follow up of 22 (17–26) months, nine patients had died and 95 were reviewed. Of these, 32 underwent laparoscopic resection while 63 had open surgery. Patients were well matched for all baseline characteristics. The median length of the wound in the laparoscopic group was 9 cm (IQR: 8–11 cm) while in the open group it was 20.8 cm (IQR: 17–24 cm). There was no significant difference in incisional hernia rates between the groups (3 vs. 10, p = 0.52) or in those who had symptoms from their hernia (p = 0.773).

Conclusions

Laparoscopic colorectal resection does not appear to reduce incisional hernia rates when compared with open surgery. Large randomised trials are required to confirm these findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Franklin ME, Kazantsev GB, Abrego D, Diaz-E JA, Balli J, Glass JL (2000) Laparoscopic surgery for stage III colon cancer: Long term follow up. Surg Endosc 14(7):612–616

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hahnloser D, Chanson Ch, Nassiopoulos K, Wahl P, Petropoulos P (2002) Laparoscopic surgery of colorectal cancer. Apropos of 103 interventions. Swiss Surg 8(5):203–208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Morino M, Parini U, Giraudo G, Salval M, Brachet Contul R, Garrone C (2003) Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision : a consecutive series of 100 patients. Ann Surg 237(3):335–342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Polliand C, Barrat C, Raselli R, Elizalde A, Champault G (2002) Colorectal cancer:74 patients treated by laparoscopic resection with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Annales de Chirurgie 127(9):690–696

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hoer J, Lawong G, Klinge U, Schumpelick V (2002) Factors influencing the development of incisional hernia. A retrospective study of 2,983 laparotomy patients over a period of 10 years. Chirurg 73(5):474–480

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Adell-Carceller R, Segarra-Soria MA, Pellicer-Castell V, Marcote-Valdivieso E, Gamon-Giner R, Martin-Franco MA, Ibanez-Palacin F, Torner-Pardo A (2006) Incisional hernia in colorectal cancer surgery. Associated risk factors. Cir Esp 79(1):42–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Regnard JF, Hay JM, Rea S, Finerhut A, Flamant Y, Maillard JN (1988) Ventral Incisional hernias: incidence, date of recurrence, localization and risk factors. Ital J Surg Sci 18(3):259–265

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Grantcharov TP, Rosenberg J (2001) Vertical compared with transverse incisions in abdominal surgery. Eur J of Surg 167(4):260–267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fassiadis N, Roidl M, Hennig M, South LM, Andrews SM (2005) Randomized clinical trial of vertical or transverse laparotomy for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg 92(10):1208–1211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Van ‘t Riet M, Steyerberg EW, Nellensteyn J, Bonjer HJ, Jeekel J (2002) Meta-analysis of techniques for closure of midline abdominal incisions. Br J Surg 89(110):13

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gecim IE, Kocak S, Ersoz S, Bumin C, Aribal D (1996) Recurrence after incisional hernia repair: results and risk factors. Surg Today 26:607–609

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lumley J, Stitz R, Stevenson A, Fielding G, Luck A (2002) Laparoscopic colorectal Surgery for cancer: intermediate to long-term outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 45(7):867–872

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Regadas FS, Rodrigues LV, Nicodemo AM, Siebra JA, Furtado DC, Regadas SM (1998) Complications in laparoscopic colorectal resection: main types and prevention. Surg Lap & Endos 8(3):189–192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jacobus WAB, Roland WL, Wim CJH, Jens AH, Emiel GGV, Johannes J (2004) Long term follow-up of a randomized contolled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann of Surg 240:578–585

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sorensen LT, Hemmingsen UB, Kirkeby LT, Kallehave F, Jorgensen LN (2005) Smoking is a risk factor for incisional hernia. Arch of Surg 140:119–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Strzelczyk JM, Szymanski D, Nowicki ME, Wilczynski W, Gaszynski T, Czupryniak L (2006) Randomised clinical trial of postoperative hernia prophylaxis in open bariatric surgery. Br J Surg 93:1347–1350

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pans A, Desaive C (1995) Use of an absorbable polglactin mesh for the prevention of incisional hernias. Acta Chir Belg 95:265–268

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fassiadis N, Roidl M, Hennig M, South LM, Andrews SM (2005) Randomised clinical trial of vertical or transverse laparotomy for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg 92:1208–1211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ugo Ihedioha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ihedioha, U., Mackay, G., Leung, E. et al. Laparoscopic colorectal resection does not reduce incisional hernia rates when compared with open colorectal resection. Surg Endosc 22, 689–692 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9462-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9462-y

Keywords

Navigation