Skip to main content
Log in

Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a preliminary experience

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is a major conceptual change in the field of modern surgery. However, corresponding technological refinements are not yet available to fill the gap separating the current laparoscopy from the NOTES of the future. Meanwhile, “hybrid” NOTES techniques, including single-port procedures, have been increasingly reported. This report describes a technique of single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) for selected patients with acute appendicitis.

Methods

Patients with noncomplicated acute appendicitis, excluding those with abscess, perforation, peritonitis, previous surgery, or obesity, underwent SILA. The procedure was performed using a single 15-mm-diameter umbilical incision with two 5-mm-diameter port sites.

Results

The study enrolled 36 women and 19 men with a mean age of 28 years (range, 18–78 years). The procedure was achieved for 41 patients (74.5%). The mean operative time was 39 min (range, 14–111 min). There was no mortality. The postoperative complication rate was 5.4% (3 complications in 3 patients), and the median hospital stay was 39 h (range, 8–240 h).

Conclusion

The SILA technique is safe and feasible for selected patients with noncomplicated acute appendicitis. Compared with other transumbilical techniques of appendectomy, SILA has the advantages of feasibility without endoscopic skills and an acceptable operative time. Technical refinements and accomplished learning probably will enable its wider use for more patients with acute appendicitis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kalloo AN, Singh VK, Jagannath SB, Niiyama H, Hill SL, Vaughn CA, Magee CA, Kantsevoy SV (2004) Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity. Gastrointest Endosc 60:114–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bergman S, Melvin WS (2008) Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. Surg Clin North Am 88:1131–1148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nassif J, Zacharopoulou C, Marescaux J, Wattiez A (2009) Transvaginal extraperitoneal lymphadenectomy by natural orifices transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) technique in porcine model: feasibility and survival study. Gynecol Oncol 112:405–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sánchez-Margallo FM, Asencio JM, Tejonero MC, Pérez FJ, Sánchez MA, Usón J, Pascual S (2008) Technical feasibility of totally natural orifice cholecystectomy in a swine model. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 17:361–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nakajima K, Takahashi T, Souma Y, Shinzaki S, Yamada T, Yoshio T, Nishida T (2008) Transvaginal endoscopic partial gastrectomy in porcine models: the role of an extra endoscope for gastric control. Surg Endosc 22:2733–2736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Crouzet S, Haber GP, Kamoi K, Berger A, Brethauer S, Gatmaitan P, Gill IS, Kaouk JH (2008) Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) renal cryoablation in a porcine model. BJU Int 102:1715–1718

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mintz Y, Horgan S, Cullen J, Stuart D, Falor E, Talamini MA (2008) NOTES: a review of the technical problems encountered and their solutions. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18:583–587

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Marescaux J, Dallemagne B, Perretta S, Wattiez A, Mutter D, Coumaros D (2007) Surgery without scars: report of transluminal cholecystectomy in a human being. Arch Surg 142:823–826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Palanivelu C, Rajan PS, Rangarajan M, Prasad M, Kalyanakumari V, Parthasarathi R, Senthilnathan P (2009) NOTES: transvaginal endoscopic cholecystectomy in humans: preliminary report of a case series. Am J Gastroenterol 104:843–847

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Leroy J, Cahill RA, Asakuma M, Dallemagne B, Marescaux J (2009) Single-access laparoscopic sigmoidectomy as definitive surgical management of prior diverticulitis in a human patient. Arch Surg 144:173–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Palanivelu C, Rajan PS, Rangarajan M, Parthasarathi R, Senthilnathan P, Praveenraj P (2008) Transumbilical endoscopic appendectomy in humans: on the road to NOTES: a prospective study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18:579–582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gupta A, Shrivastava UK, Kumar P, Burman D (2005) Minilaparoscopic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Trop Gastroenterol 26:149–151

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Trap R, Kehlet H, Rosenberg J (2000) Pain after microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized double-blind controlled study. Surg Endosc 14:340–344

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Trap R, Kehlet H, Rosenberg J (2002) Microlaparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind trial. Surg Endosc 16:458–464

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McCloy R, Randall D, Schug SA, Kehlet H, Simanski C, Bonnet F, Camu F, Fischer B, Joshi G, Rawal N, Neugebauer EA (2008) Is smaller necessarily better? A systematic review comparing the effects of minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy on patient outcomes. Surg Endosc 22:2541–2553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nguyen NT, Zainabadi K, Mavandadi S, Paya M, Stevens CM, Root J, Wilson SE (2004) Trends in utilization and outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Am J Surg 188:813–820

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Champault A, Polliand C, Mendes da Costa P, Champault G (2008) Laparoscopic appendectomies: retrospective study of 2,074 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 18:168–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S, Gevorgyan A, Essani R (2005) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg 242:439–448

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Little DC, Custer MD, May BH, Blalock SE, Cooney DR (2002) Laparoscopic appendectomy: an unnecessary and expensive procedure in children? J Pediatr Surg 37:310–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rispoli G, Armellino MF, Esposito C (2002) One-trocar appendectomy. Surg Endosc 16:833–835

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rozen WM, Tran TM, Ashton MW, Barrington MJ, Ivanusic JJ, Taylor GI (2008) Refining the course of the thoracolumbar nerves: a new understanding of the innervation of the anterior abdominal wall. Clin Anat 21:325–333

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Koontz CS, Smith LA, Burkholder HC, Higdon K, Aderhold R, Carr M (2006) Video-assisted transumbilical appendectomy in children. J Pediatr Surg 41:710–712

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Konstadoulakis MM, Gomatos IP, Antonakis PT, Manouras A, Albanopoulos K, Nikiteas N, Leandros E, Bramis J (2006) Two-trocar laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy in patients with acute appendicitis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 16:27–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ng PC (1997) One-puncture laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 7:22–24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wallace M (2006) Take NOTES (natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery). Gastroenterology 131:11–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Giday SA, Kantsevoy SV, Kallo AN (2006) Principle and history of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 15:373–377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wu C, Prachand VN (2008) Reverse NOTES: a hybrid technique of laparoscopic and endoscopic retrieval of an ingested foreign body. JSLS 12:395–398

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Escourrou J, Shehab H, Buscail L, Bournet B, Andrau P, Moreau J, Fourtanier G (2008) Peroral transgastric/transduodenal necrosectomy: success in the treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis. Ann Surg 248:1074–1080

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Buess GF (2008) Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 17:329–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Arezzo A, Repici A, Kirschniak A, Schurr MO, Ho CN, Morino M (2008) New developments for endoscopic hollow organ closure in prospective of NOTES. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 17:355–360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Andrew A. Gumbs is a consultant for Ethicon, a proctor and course instructor for Covidien, and a proctor for Novare Surgical. He has received honoraria from Novare Surgical and Applied Medical. Elie Chouillard, Arnaud Dache, Adriana Torcivia, Nada Helmy, and Ivan Ruseykin have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elie Chouillard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chouillard, E., Dache, A., Torcivia, A. et al. Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a preliminary experience. Surg Endosc 24, 1861–1865 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0860-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0860-1

Keywords

Navigation