Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Laparoscopic colectomy is safe and leads to a significantly shorter hospital stay for octogenarians

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Concerns about prolonged postoperative recovery may detract surgeons from offering colectomy to patients older than 80 years. The adoption of a minimally invasive approach may help to counter these beliefs, but concerns remain as to whether these patients can tolerate a pneumoperitoneum. This study compared outcomes after laparoscopic colectomy (LC) and open colectomy (OC) for patients older than 80 years.

Methods

From a prospectively maintained database, 97 patients undergoing elective LC between 1994 and 2008 were identified and matched 1:1 to OC patients for age, gender, year of surgery, extent of resection, proximal diversion, American Society of Anesthesiology score, and body mass index. Short-term outcomes including postoperative mortality, morbidity, and discharge status were assessed.

Results

The LC and OC patients were similar for the matched characteristics. Their mean age was 82.8 years (range, 80–94 years). The conversion rate for the LC patients was 14.4%. The OC group had a higher proportion of cancer patients (93.8% vs. 59.8%; P = 0.001). The discharge status for the LC and OC patients was similar, and most patients were discharged home without assistance (63.9% vs. 62.9%; P = 0.88). The median hospital stay was significantly shorter for LC (6 days; range, 1–67 days) than for OC (7 days; range, 2–53 days; P = 0.001). The 30-day postoperative complications (OC, 43.3% vs. LC, 37.1%; P = 0.38), reoperations (OC, 5.2% vs. LC, 4.1%; P = 0.73), and readmissions (OC, 6.2% vs. LC, 9.3%; P = 0.41) were similar. The overall mortality rate was 5.2% and similar between the two groups.

Conclusion

Complications and other outcomes are similar for LC and OC, and the earlier recovery associated with LC, as evidenced by a shorter hospital stay, may encourage a wider adoption of LC for patients older than 80 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. U.S. Bureau of the Census (2008) Annual estimates of the resident population by sex and five-year age groups for the United States. Retrieved 21 July 2009 at http://www.census.gov/popest/national/asrh/NC-EST2008/NC-EST2008-01.xls. Vintage 2008

  2. Bender JS, Magnuson TH, Zenilman ME, Smith-Meek MM, Ratner LE, Jones CE, Smith GW (1996) Outcome following colon surgery in the octogenarian. Am Surg 62:276–279

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sagar PM, Hartley MN, Mancey-Jones B, Sedman PC, May J, Macfie J (1994) Comparative audit of colorectal resection with the POSSUM scoring system. Br J Surg 81:1492–1494

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bonjer HJ, Hop WC, Nelson H, Sargent DJ, Lacy AM, Castells A, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Brown J, Delgado S, Kuhrij E, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Transatlantic Laparoscopically Assisted vs. Open Colectomy Trials Study Group (2007) Laparoscopically assisted vs. open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg 142:298–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Delaney CP, Kiran RP, Senagore AJ, Brady K, Fazio VW (2003) Case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcome after laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 238:67–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zollinger A, Krayer S, Singer T, Seifert B, Heinzelmann M, Schlumpf R, Pasch T (1997) Haemodynamic effects of pneumoperitoneum in elderly patients with an increased cardiac risk. Eur J Anaesthesiol 14:266–275

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stewart BT, Stitz RW, Lumley JW (1999) Laparoscopically assisted colorectal surgery in the elderly. Br J Surg 86:938–941

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stocchi L, Nelson H, Young-Fadok TM, Larson DR, Ilstrup DM (2000) Safety and advantages of laparoscopic vs. open colectomy in the elderly: matched control study. Dis Colon Rectum 43:326–332

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Delgado S, Lacy AM, García Valdecasas JC, Balagué C, Pera M, Salvador L, Momblan D, Visa J (2000) Could age be an indication for laparoscopic colectomy in colorectal cancer? Surg Endosc 14:22–26

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tuech JJ, Pessaux P, Rouge C, Regenet N, Bergamaschi R, Arnaud JP (2000) Laparoscopic vs. open colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis: a prospective comparative study in the elderly. Surg Endosc 14:1031–1033

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Law WL, Chu KW, Tung PHM (2002) Laparoscopic colorectal resection: a safe option for elderly patients. J Am Coll Surg 195:768–773

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Senagore AJ, Madbouly KM, Fazio VW, Duepree HJ, Brady KM, Delaney CP (2003) Advantages of laparoscopic colectomy in older patients. Arch Surg 138:252–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sklow B, Read T, Birnbaum E, Fry R, Fleshman J (2003) Age and type of procedure influence the choice of patients for laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 17:923–929

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Feng B, Zheng MH, Mao ZH, Li JW, Lu AG, Wang ML, Hu WG, Dong F, Hu YY, Zang L, Li HW (2006) Clinical advantages of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in the elderly. Aging Clin Exp Res 18:191–195

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Seshadri PA, Mamazza J, Schlachta CM, Cadeddu MO, Poulin EC (2001) Laparoscopic colorectal resection in octogenarians. Surg Endosc 15:802–805

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yamamoto S, Watanabe M, Hasegawa H, Baba H, Kitajima M (2003) Short-term surgical outcomes of laparoscopic colonic surgery in octogenarians: a matched case-control study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 13:95–100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vignali A, Di Palo S, Tamburini A, Radaelli G, Orsenigo E, Staudacher C (2005) Laparoscopic vs. open colectomies in octogenarians: a case-matched control study. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2070–2075

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cheung HY, Chung CC, Fung JT, Wong JC, Yau KK, Li MK (2007) Laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer in octogenarians: results in a decade. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1905–1910

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Etzioni DA, Liu JH, O’Connell JB, Maggard MA, Ko CY (2003) Elderly patients in surgical workloads: a population-based analysis. Am Surg 69:961–965

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hobler KE (1986) Colon surgery for cancer in the very elderly: cost and 3-year survival. Ann Surg 203:129–131

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Spivak H, Maele DV, Friedman I, Nussbaum M (1996) Colorectal surgery in octogenarians. J Am Coll Surg 183:46–50

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wise WE Jr, Padmanabhan A, Meesig DM, Arnold MW, Aguilar PS, Stewart WR (1991) Abdominal colon and rectal operations in the elderly. Dis Colon Rectum 34:959–963

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stocchi L, Nelson H (2006) Laparoscopic colon resection for cancer. Adv Surg 40:59–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Legner VJ, Massarweh NN, Symons RG, McCormick WC, Flum DR (2009) The significance of discharge to skilled care after abdominopelvic surgery in older adults. Ann Surg 249:250–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Lei Lian, Matthew Kalady, Daniel Geisler, and Ravi Kiran have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Digestive Disease Center-A30, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA

    Lei Lian, Matthew Kalady, Daniel Geisler & Ravi Pokala Kiran

Authors
  1. Lei Lian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matthew Kalady
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daniel Geisler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ravi Pokala Kiran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ravi Pokala Kiran.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lian, L., Kalady, M., Geisler, D. et al. Laparoscopic colectomy is safe and leads to a significantly shorter hospital stay for octogenarians. Surg Endosc 24, 2039–2043 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-0900-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-0900-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation