Skip to main content
Log in

The decisive role of the patient-side surgeon in robotic surgery

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Minimally invasive technology literature is mainly concerned about the feasibility of the robotic procedures and the performance of the console surgeon. However, few of these technologies could be applied without a well-trained team. Our goal was to demonstrate that robotic surgery depends more on the patient-side assistant surgeon’s abilities than has been previously reported.

Methods

In our department, 280 interventions in digestive, thoracic, and gynecological surgery were performed since the acquisition of the robotic equipment. There are three teams trained in robotic surgery with three console surgeons and four certified patient-side surgeons. Four more patient-side assistants were trained at our center. Trocar placement, docking and undocking of the robot, insertion of the laparoscopic instruments, and hemostatic maneuvers with various devices were quantified and compared.

Results

Assistants trained by using animal or cadaver surgery are more comfortable with the robotic instruments handling and with docking and undocking of the robot. Assistants who finalized their residency or attend their final year are more accurate with the insertion of the laparoscopic instrument to the targeted organ and more skillful with LigaSure or clip applier devices. Interventions that require vivid participation of the assistants have shorter assistant-depending time intervals at the end of the learning curve than at the beginning.

Conclusions

Robotic surgery is a team effort and is greatly dependant on the performance of assistant surgeons. Interventions that have the benefit of a trained team are more rapid and secure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Intuitive Surgical (2009) www.intuitivesurgical.com. Ref Type: Online Source

  2. Wexner SD, Bergamaschi R, Lacy A, Udo J, Brolmann H, Kennedy RH, John H (2009) The current status of robotic pelvic surgery: results of a multinational interdisciplinary consensus conference. Surg Endosc 23:438–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Herron DM, Marohn M (2008) A consensus document on robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 22:313–325

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rogers CG, Laungani R, Bhandari A, Krane LS, Eun D, Patel MN, Boris R, Shrivastava A, Menon M (2009) Maximizing console surgeon independence during robot-assisted renal surgery by using the Fourth Arm and TilePro. J Endourol 23:115–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Drasin T, Dutson E, Gracia C (2004) Use of a robotic system as surgical first assistant in advanced laparoscopic surgery. J Am Coll Surg 199:368–373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee DI, Eichel L, Skarecky DW, Ahlering TE (2004) Robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with a single assistant. Urology 63:1172–1175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kumar R, Hemal AK (2006) The ‘scrubbed surgeon’ in robotic surgery. World J Urol 24:144–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mandhani A, Tewari AK, Berryhill R Jr (2007) Athermal robotic technique of radical prostatectomy: an assistant’s perspective. Arch Esp Urol 60:375–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vasile S, Sgarbura O, Tomulescu V, Popescu I (2008) The robotic-assisted left lateral hepatic segmentectomy: the next step. Chirurgia (Bucur) 103:401–405

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Vasilescu C, Sgarbura O, Tudor S, Herlea V, Popescu I (2009) Robotic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy. A case report. Acta Chir Belg 109:396–399

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vasilescu C, Sgarbura O, Tudor S, Popa M, Turcanu A, Florescu A, Herlea V, Anghel R (2009) Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy: our early experience. Chirurgia (Bucur) 104:393–397

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tomulescu V, Stanciulea O, Balescu I, Vasile S, Tudor S, Gheorghe C, Vasilescu C, Popescu I (2009) First year experience of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery with 153 cases in a general surgery department: indications, technique and results. Chirurgia (Bucur) 104:141–150

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Vasilescu C, Popescu I (2008) Robotic surgery–possibilities and perspectives. Chirurgia (Bucur) 103:9–11

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sundaram CP, Koch MO, Gardner T, Bernie JE (2005) Utility of the fourth arm to facilitate robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 95:183–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Esposito MP, Ilbeigi P, Ahmed M, Lanteri V (2005) Use of fourth arm in da Vinci robot-assisted extraperitoneal laparoscopic prostatectomy: novel technique. Urology 66:649–652

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Van Appledorn S, Bouchier-Hayes D, Agarwal D, Costello AJ (2006) Robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: setup and procedural techniques after 150 cases. Urology 67:364–367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Dr. Olivia Sgarbura and Dr. Catalin Vasilescu have no conflict of interests or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catalin Vasilescu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sgarbura, O., Vasilescu, C. The decisive role of the patient-side surgeon in robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 24, 3149–3155 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1108-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1108-9

Keywords

Navigation