Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus transanal endoscopic microsurgery for the treatment of early rectal cancer

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) are minimally invasive procedures that can be used to treat early rectal cancer.

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare clinical efficacy between ESD and TEM for the treatment of early rectal cancer.

Methods

Between July 2008 and August 2011, 24 patients with early rectal cancers were treated by ESD (11) or TEM (13) at the Cancer Institute of São Paulo University Medical School (São Paulo, Brazil). Data were analyzed retrospectively according to database and pathological reports, with respect to en bloc resection rate, local recurrence, complications, histological diagnosis, procedure time and length of hospital stay.

Results

En bloc resection rates with free margins were achieved in 81.8 % of patients in the ESD group and 84.6 % of patients in the TEM group (p = 0.40). Mean tumor size was 64.6 ± 57.9 mm in the ESD group and 43.9 ± 30.7 mm in the TEM group (p = 0.13). Two patients in the TEM group and one patient in the ESD group had a local recurrence. The mean procedure time was 133 ± 94.8 min in the ESD group and 150 ± 66.3 min in the TEM group (p = 0.69). Mean hospital stay was 3.8 ± 3.3 days in the ESD group and 4.08 ± 1.7 days in the TEM group (p = 0.81).

Limitations

This was a non-randomized clinical trial with a small sample size and selection bias in treatment options.

Conclusion

ESD and TEM are both safe and effective for the treatment of early rectal cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Estimativas (2010) Incidência de Câncer no Brasil. Instituto Nacional de Câncer

  2. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN et al (1993) Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 329:1977–1981

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ono H, Kondo H, Gotoda T et al (2001) Endoscopic mucosal resection for treatment of early gastric cancer. Gut 48:225–229

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chaves DM, Maluf-Filho F, Moura EGH et al (2010) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of early esophageal and gastric cancer: initial experience of a western center. Clinics 65:377–382

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cardoso DMM, Campoli PMO, Yokoi C et al (2008) Initial experience in Brazil with endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer using insulation-tipped knife: a safety and feasibility study. Gastric Cancer 11:226–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Onozato Y, Kakizaki S, Ishihara H et al (2007) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal tumors. Endoscopy 39:423–427

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Palma P, Freudenberg S, Samuel S et al (2004) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: indications and results after 100 cases. Colorectal Dis 6:350–355

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Guerrieri M, Baldarelli M, de Sanctis A et al (2010) Treatment of rectal adenomas by transanal endoscopic microsurgery: 15 years’ experience. Surg Endosc 24:445–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kudo S, Hirota S, Nakajima T et al (1994) Colorectal tumors and pit pattern. J Clin Pathol 47:880–885

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kitajima K, Fujimori T, Fujii S et al (2004) Correlations between lymph node metastasis and depth of submucosal invasion in submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma: a Japanese collaborative study. J Gastroenterol 39:534–543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wada Y, Kudo S, Kashida H et al (2009) Diagnosis of colorectal lesions with magnifying narrow-band imaging system. Gastrointest Endosc 70:522–531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kiriyama S, Saito Y, Matsuda T et al (2011) Comparing endoscopic submucosal dissection with transanal resection for non-invasive rectal tumor: a retrospective study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 26(6):1028–1033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. de Graaf EJR, Burger JWA, van IJsseldijk et al (2011) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is superior to transanal excision of rectal adenomas. Colorectal Dis 13:762–767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Saito Y, Fukuzawa M, Matsuda T et al (2010) Clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal tumors as determined by curative resection. Surg Endosc 24:343–352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Barendse RM, van den Broek FJC, Dekker E et al (2011) Systematic review of endoscopic mucosal resection versus transanal endoscopic microsurgery for large rectal adenomas. Endoscopy 43:941–955

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hurlstone DP, Sanders DS, Cross SS et al (2007) A prospective analysis pf extended endoscopic mucosal resection for large rectal villous adenomas: an alternative technique to transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Colorectal Dis 7:339–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ganai S, Kanumuri P, Rao RS et al (2006) Local recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal polyps and early cancers. Ann Surg Oncol 13:547–556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Endreseth BH, Wibe A, Svinsas M et al (2005) Postoperative morbidity and recurrence after local excision of rectal adenomas and rectal cancer by transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Colorectal Dis 7:133–137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schäfer H, Baldus SE, Hölscher AH (2006) Giant adenomas of the rectum: complete resection by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). Int J Colorectal Dis 21:533–537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Park SU, Min YW, Shin JU et al (2012) Endoscopic submucosal dissection or transanal endoscopic microsurgery for nonpolypoid rectal high grade dysplasia and submucosa-invading rectal cancer. Endoscopy 44:1031–1036

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Goudard Y, Ciacio O, Chaussade S et al (2011) Bilateral pneumothorax has no specific impact upon endoscopic rectal perforation management. Dig Liver Dis 43:750–751

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Law WD, Tan KY (2012) Pneumothorax following endoscopic submucosal dissection of a rectal tumor. Asian J Endosc Surg 5:86–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Saito Y, Uraoka T, Yamaguchi Y et al (2010) A prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 72:1217–1225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tanaka S, Oka S, Kaneko I et al (2007) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: possibility of standardization. Gastrointest Endosc 66:100–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hotta K, Oyama T, Shinohara T et al (2010) Learning curve for endoscopic submucosal dissection of large colorectal tumors. Dig Endosc 22:302–306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Fabio S. Kawaguti, Caio S.R. Nahas, Carlos F.S. Marques, Bruno da Costa Martins, Felipe A. Retes, Raphael S.S. Medeiros, Takemasa Hayashi, Yoshiki Wada, Marcelos S. de Lima, Ricardo S. Uemura, Sergio C. Nahas, Shin-ei Kudo and Fauze Maluf-Filho have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fábio Shiguehissa Kawaguti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kawaguti, F.S., Nahas, C.S.R., Marques, C.F.S. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus transanal endoscopic microsurgery for the treatment of early rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 28, 1173–1179 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3302-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3302-z

Keywords

Navigation