Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Visual evaluation of the larynx and hypopharynx during esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a safety and feasibility study

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The larynx and hypopharynx are common sites for head and neck cancer, which shares many risk factors with upper digestive tract disease. Patient survival with malignancies depends on stage at the time of diagnosis. Endoscopic screening of the hypopharynx is neither routinely performed in clinical practice nor has it been evaluated in a formal study.

Methods

This is a prospective pilot study of patients undergoing routine EGD. Demographic data were collected from patients prior to the procedure. All patients in the study underwent an EGD and prior to performing the standard portion of the EGD procedure, the endoscopist evaluated the larynx and hypopharynx with both white light endoscopy (WLE) and narrow band imaging (NBI). Details of the procedure, including ability to see all anatomic structures, time spent, complications, and findings, were recorded.

Results

A total of 111 patients were included in the study. The exam of the laryngopharynx was completed in 87 % of patients (97/111). Reasons for incomplete exam included intubated patients (2/14), inadequate sedation (9/14), and inability to see the entire hypopharynx (3/14). The mean time of the WLE was 20.2 s, while the NBI evaluation took 15.6 s for a mean and 35.8 s for the entire exam of the larynx and hypopharynx. Minor procedural complications occurred in 3/11 (2.7 %) of the patients and included hypotension, tachycardia, and hypoxia. There were 6 patients who had hypopharyngeal abnormalities seen on both WLE and NBI (5.4 %) and were subsequently referred to otolaryngology. Of the six referrals, one patient had a vocal cord biopsy showing leukoplakia, while the others were deemed normal anatomic variants.

Conclusions

Evaluation of the hypopharynx can be accomplished by gastrointestinal endoscopists at the time of EGD in the vast majority of patients in a safe manner while adding only about 35 s to the overall exam time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hoffman HT, Porter K, Karnell LH (2006) Laryngeal cancer in the United States: changes in demographics, patterns of care, and survival. Laryngoscope 116:1–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Muto M, Minashi K, Yano T (2010) Early detection of superficial squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck region and esophagus by narrow band imaging: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 28:1566–1572

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. East JE, Tan EK, Bergman JJ (2008) Meta-analysis: narrow band imaging for lesion characterization in the colon, oesophagus, duodenal ampulla and lung. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 28:854–867

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nonaka S, Saito Y, Oda I (2010) Narrow-band imaging endoscopy with magnification is useful for detecting metachronous superficial pharyngeal cancer in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 25:264–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Biacabe B, Gleich LL, Laccourreye O, Hartl DM, Bouchoucha M, Brasnu D (1998). Silent gastroesophageal reflux disease in patients with pharyngolaryngeal cancer: further results. Head Neck 20(6):510–514

  6. Emura F, Baron TH, Gralnek IM (2013) The pharynx: examination of an area too often ignored during upper endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 78:143–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sipe BW, Rex DK, Latinovich D, Overley C, Kinser K, Bratcher L, Kareken D (2002) Propofol versus midazolam/meperidine for outpatient colonoscopy: administration by nurses supervised by endoscopists. Gastrointest Endosc 56(2):324

  8. Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, van Ballegooijen M, Hankey BF, Shi W, Bond JH, Schapiro M, Panish JF, Stewart ET, Waye JD (2012) Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 366(8):687–696

  9. Magnus MC, Ping M, Shen MM (2011) Effectiveness of mammography screening in reducing breast cancer mortality in women aged 39–49 years: a meta-analysis. J Womens Health 20:845–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, Black WC, Clapp JD, Fagerstrom RM, Gareen IF, Gatsonis C, Marcus PM, Sicks JD (2011) Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. NEJM 365:395–409

  11. Kujan O, Glenny A, Duxbury J, Thakker N, Sloan P (2005) Evaluation of screening strategies for improving oral cancer mortality: a cochrane systematic review. J Dent Educ 69:255–265

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Aitken JF, Youl PH, Janda M, Lowe JB, Ring IT, Elwood M (2006) Increase in skin cancer screening during a community-based randomized intervention trial. Int J Cancer 118:1010–1016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. al. HEe (2012) SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2009

  14. Spector JGea (2001) Delayed regional metastases, distant metastases, and second primary malignancies in squamous cell carcinomas of the larynx and hypopharynx. Laryngoscope 111:1079–1087

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Probst R, Grevers G (2006) Basic otorhinolaryngology: a step-by-step learning guide. Thieme, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sieg A, Hachmoeller-Eisenbach U, Eisenbach T (2001) Prospective evaluation of complications in outpatient GI endoscopy: a survey among German gastroenterologists. Gastrointest Endosc 53(6):620–627

  17. Kulapaditharom B, Boonkitticharoen V (2001) Performance characteristics of fluorescence endoscope in detection of head and neck cancers. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 110:45–52

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Piazza C, Peretti G (2008) Narrow-band imaging: a new tool for evaluation of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Review of the literature. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 28:49–54

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Piccirillo JF, Lacy PD, Basu A (2002) Development of a new head and neck cancer-specific comorbidity index. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128:1172–1179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Duchateau CS, Stokkel MP (2005) Second primary tumors involving non-small cell lung cancer: prevalence and its influence on survival. Chest 127:1152–1158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

None.

Disclosures

Shanlee Stevens, Dr. Johnson, Dr. Pfau, and Dr. Dailey have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Funding

No specific funding was used for this study or paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric A. Johnson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stevens, S.M., Johnson, E.A., Pfau, P.R. et al. Visual evaluation of the larynx and hypopharynx during esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a safety and feasibility study. Surg Endosc 29, 1209–1215 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3796-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3796-z

Keywords

Navigation