Skip to main content
Log in

Preperitoneal bilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy

Evolution of a technique from conventional to laparoscopic

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Simultaneous repair of bilateral inguinal hernia remains controversial.

Methods: Seventy-two consecutive patients underwent a preperitoneal prosthetic repair of bilateral groin hernia; 25 via laparoscopy. ASA classification, Nyhus type, hospitalization, convalescence time, and cost were examined. Mean follow-up was 36 and 12 months for the conventional and laparoscopic group respectively.

Results: Sixty-nine patients were available for long-term follow-up. Average hospital stay, recurrence rate, perioperative urinary retention, transient thigh neuralgia, and return to normal activities were 48 hours, 5%, 9%, 6%, and 22 days as compared to 4 hours, 6%, 20%, 12%, and 9 days for the conventional and laparoscopic group respectively. The cost for laparoscopic repair was $500 greater.

Conclusions: The preperitoneal approach to repair of bilateral hernias demonstrates an acceptable recurrence rate with low long-term morbidity. Experience with conventional preperitoneal technique greatly facilitates transition to laparoscopic repair.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cheatle GL (1920) An operation for the radical cure of inguinal and femoral hernia. Br Med J 68:2

    Google Scholar 

  2. Corbitt JD (1993) Transabdominal preperitoneal herniorrhaphy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3: 328

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cornell RB, Kerlakian GM (1994) Early complications and outcomes of the current technique of transperitoneal laparoscopic herniorrhaphy and a comparison to the traditional open approach. Am J Surg 168: 275

    Google Scholar 

  4. Geis WP, Malago M (1994) Laparoscopic bilateral inguinal herniorrhaphies: use of a single giant preperitoneal mesh patch. Am Surg 60: 558

    Google Scholar 

  5. Henry AK (1936) Operation for femoral hernia. Lancet 1:531–533

    Google Scholar 

  6. Miller AR, Van Heerden JA, Naessens JM, O'Brien PC (1991) Simultaneous bilateral hernia repair: a case against conventional wisdom. Ann Surg 213: 272

    Google Scholar 

  7. Newman L III, Eubanks S, Mason E, Duncan TD (1993) Is laparoscopic herniorrhaphy an effective alternative to open hernia repair? J Laparoendosc Surg 3: 121

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nyhus LM, Pollak R, Bombeck CT, Donahue PE (1988) The preperitoneal approach and prosthetic buttress repair for recurrent hernia. Ann Surg 208: 733

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ormond NM, Panton MB, Panton RJ (1994) Laparoscopic hernia repair. Am J Surg 167: 535

    Google Scholar 

  10. Payne JH, Grininger LM, Izawa MT, Podoll EF, Lindahl PJ, Balfour J (1994) Laparoscopic or open inguinal herniorrhaphy? A randomized prospective trial. Arch Surg 129: 9: 973–979

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Peacock EE Jr, Madden JW (1974) Studies on the biology and treatment of recurrent inguinal hernia: II. Morphological changes. Ann Surg 179: 567

    Google Scholar 

  12. Phillips EH, Arregui ME, Carroll BJ, Corbitt J, Crafton WB, Fallas MJ, Filipi C, Fitzgibbons RT, Franklin MJ, McKernan B (1995) Incidence of complication following laparoscopic hernioplasty. Surg Endosc 9:16–21

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ris HB, Aebersol P, Kupfer K, Stucki U, Stirnemann H, Doran J (1987) 10 years experience using a modified Shouldice technique for inguinal hernia in adults. II. Which factors modify the recurrence of inguinal hernia? Chirug 58: 2: 100

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sailors DM, Layman TS, Burns PR, Chanlder KE, Russell WL (1993) Laparoscopic hernia repair. Am J Surg 59: 85–89

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schaap HM, Van de Paroordt HO, Bast TJ (1992) The preperitoneal approach in the repair of recurrent inguinal hernias. Surg Gynecol Obstet 174: 460–464

    Google Scholar 

  16. Seid AS, Amos E (1994) Entrapment neuropathy in laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. Surg Endosc 8: 1050

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stoppa RE, Warlaumont CR, Verhaeghe PJ, Romero ER, M'Balla-N'Di (1986) Prosthetic repair in the treatment of groin hernias. Int Surg 71: 154

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stoppa R (1975) Unsutured Dacron prosthesis in groin hernias. Int Surg 60: 411

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stott MA, Sutton R, Royle GT (1988) Bilateral inguinal hernias: simultaneous or sequential repair? Postgrad Med 64: 751: 375

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tetik C, Arregui ME, Dulacq JL, Fitzgibbons RJ, Franklin ME, McKernan JB, Rosin RD, Schultz LS, Toy FK (1994) Complications and recurrences associated with laparoscopic repair of groin hernias: a multi-institutional retrospective analysis. Surg Endosc 8: 1316–1323

    Google Scholar 

  21. Velasco JM, Vallina VL (1993) Preperitoneal hernia repair open and laparoscopic technique comparison (Minimally invasive surgery and new technology). Missouri Quality Medical Publishing, St. Louis, MO

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wantz GE (1989) Giant prosthetic reinforcement of the visceral sac. Surg Gynecol Obstet 169: 408

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Velasco, J.M., Gelman, C. & Vallina, V.L. Preperitoneal bilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy. Surg Endosc 10, 122–127 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00188356

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00188356

Key words

Navigation