Skip to main content
Log in

A prospective analysis of the factors influencing pancreaticojejunostomy performed using a single method, in 100 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The factors influencing the healing process of pancreaticojejunostomy (P-J) following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) are still ill defined, allowing the recommendation of various anastomotic methods. We conduced a prospective study to determine the risk factors influencing the protracted healing of P-J, examining 100 consecutive patients who underwent PD followed by P-J, performed as an end-to-side “mucosa-to-mucosa” anastomosis using vertical mattress sutures (VMS method). Protracted healing of P-J was classified as either peripancreatic sepsis (PPS), defined as prolonged suppurative discharge of less than 50 ml a day from the drain beneath the P-J for more than 1 week; or a pancreatic fistula (PF), defined as prolonged discharge of more than 50 ml a day with a high amylase content (>1000 IU) for more than 1 week. There were 80 patients with a malignant neoplasm, and 20 with benign disease. The overall incidence of healing problems following P-J was 9%, which included 6 patients (6%) with PPS and 3 (3%) with PF. Apart from an advanced age of more than 70 years, none of the patients' characteristics or postoperative complications influenced the healing of P-J. The type of reconstruction, an anastomotic stent, the duct size, and a “soft” pancreas were not risk factors either. In conclusion, no factors, apart from the age or any special problem of an individual patient, influenced the dehiscence of P-J when the VMS method was used after PD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grace PA, Pitt HA, Tompkins DK (1986) Decreased morbidity and mortality after pancreatoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 151:141–149

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cameron JL, Pitt HA, Yeo CJ, Lillemoe KD, Kaufman HS, Colemanand J (1993) One hundred and forty-five consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies without mortality. Ann Surg 217:430–448

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. del Castillo CF, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL (1995) Standards for pancreatic resection in the 1990s. Arch Surg 130:295–300

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cullen JJ, Sarr MG, Ilstrup DM (1994) Pancreatic anastomotic leak after pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, significance, and management. Am J Surg 168:295–298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Martin FM, Rossi RL, Munson JL (1989) Management of pancreatic fistulas. Arch Surg 124:571–573

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Miedema BW, Sarr MG, van Heerden JA (1992) Complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Current management. Arch Surg 127:945–949.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lerult JP, Gianello PR, Otte JB, Kestens PJ (1984) Pancreaticoduodenal resection: surgical experience and evaluation of risk factors in 103 patients. Ann Surg 199:432–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Coopermen AM, Hoerr SO (1978) Cancer of the pancreatic region. In: Cooperman AM, Hoerr SO (eds) Surgery of the pancreas. A text and atlas. Mosby, St. Louis pp 185–186

    Google Scholar 

  9. Matsumoto Y, Fujii H, Miura K, Inoue S (1992) Successful pancreatojejunal anastomosis for pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 175:555–562

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Marcus SC, Cohen H, Ranson JC (1995) Optimal management of the pancreatic remmant after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 221:635–648

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gambee LP (1956) Ten years' experience with a single layer anastomosis in colon surgery. Am J Surg 92:222–227

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Maetani S (1972) Modified method of pancreaticojejunal anastomosis following pancreatoduodenectomy. Sur Gynecol Obstet 134:1003–1004

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Matsusue S, Kashihara S, Kuramoto S, Tanaka H, Nakamura Y, Sakai S, Nishikawa H, Masumoto H, Maetani S (1980) Pancreacticoduodenectomy and pancreaticojunostomy (in Japanese). Nihon Shoukakigeka Gakkai Zasshi (Jpn J Gastroent Surg) 13:379–1384

    Google Scholar 

  14. Matsusue S (1982) Healing process and patency of pancreaticojejunostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy (in Japanese with English abstract). Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi (J Jpn Surg Soc) 83:760–768

    Google Scholar 

  15. Matsusue S, Nishimura S, Koizumi S, Nakamura T, Takeda H (1995) Preventive effect of simultaneously infused lipid against thrombophlebitis during postoperative peripheral parenteral nutrition. Surg Today 25:667–671

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Warshaw AL (1995) Pancreatic surgery. A paradigm for progress in the age of the bottom line. Arch Surg 130:240–246

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nakase A, Matsumoto Y, Uchida K, Honjo I (1977) Surgical treatment of cancer of the pancreas in Japan. Ann Surg 185:52–57

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Biehl T, Traverso L (1992) Is stenting necessary for a successfl pancreatic anastomosis? Am J Surg 163:530–532

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Matsusue S, Walser M (1992) Healing of intestinal anastomoses in adrenalectomized rats given corticosterone. Am J Physiol 263 (Regul Integr Comp Physiol 32):R164-R168

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Holbrook RF, Hargrave K, Traverso LW (1996) A prospective cost analysis of pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 171:508–511

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matsusue, S., Takeda, H., Nakamura, Y. et al. A prospective analysis of the factors influencing pancreaticojejunostomy performed using a single method, in 100 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Surg Today 28, 719–726 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02484618

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02484618

Key Words

Navigation