Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Antibiotic impregnated external ventricular drainage and third ventriculostomy in the management of hydrocephalus associated with posterior cranial fossa tumours

  • Clinical Article
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The effectiveness of antibiotic pre-treated ventricular catheters in reducing the risk of CSF infections (determined on CSF cultures) resulting from the use of per-operative external ventricular drainages (EVD) and the success rate of post-operative endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) in the management of persistent hydrocephalus after posterior cranial fossa tumour removal are assessed.

Method

Forty-seven children (group I) were prospectively managed by means of per-operative antibiotic impregnated EVD, post-operative ICP monitoring, and ETV. The results of this group were compared with those of a control group composed by 44 children treated with the same protocol as above except for the use of not-impregnated catheters (group II).

Findings

The rate of positive CSF cultures due to EVD resulted significantly lower in group I (2.1% vs 31.8%); there was no clinical evidence of CSF infections. The success rate of ETV was the same in both groups (75%). Failures of ETV occurred in the patients with subarachnoid tumour seeding and/or tumour extension to the basal cisterns. All the children of group II with failed ETV also showed a bacterial growth in the CSF.

Conclusions

Antibiotic pre-treated catheters in our experience considerably limited EVD-related bacterial growth in the CSF. Preoperative hydrocephalus resolved in 60% of the cases after tumour removal, thus confirming recent data from the literature against the routine use of preoperative ETV. In our experience postoperative ETV had a high success rate; poor results were obtained in children with tumour seeding and/or the evidence of positive CSF cultures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Albright L (1983) The value of pre-craniotomy shunts in children with posterior fossa tumours. Clin Neurosurg 30:278–285

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Aryan HE, Meltzer HS, Park MS, Bennett RL, Jandial R, Levy ML (2005) Initial experience with antibiotic-impregnated silicone catheters for shunting of cerebrospinal fluid in children. Child’s Nerv Syst 21:56–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bayston R, Ashtaf W, Bhundia C (2004) Mode of action of an antimicrobial biomaterial for use in hydrocephalus shunts. J Antimicrob Chemother 53:778–782

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bognar L, Borgulya G, Benke P, Madarassy G (2003) Analysis of CSF shunting procedure requirement in children with posterior fossa tumours. Child’s Nerv Syst 19:332–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Boschert J, Hellwig D, Krauss JK (2003) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy for shunt dysfunction in occlusive hydrocephalus: long-term follow-up and review. J Neurosurg 98:1032–1039

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brockmeyer D, Abtin K, Carey L, Walker ML (1998) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy: an outcome analysis. Pediatr Nurosurg 28:236–240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cinalli G, Sainte-Rose C, Chumas P, Zerah M, Brunelle F, Lot G, Pierre-Kahn A, Renier D (1999) Failure of third ventriculostomy in the treatment of aqueductal stenosis in children. J Neurosurg 90:448–454

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cinalli G, Salazar C, Mallucci C, Yada JZ, Zerah M, Sainte-Rose C (1998) The role of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the management of shunt malfunction. Neurosurgery 43:1323–1329

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Culley DJ, Berger MS, Shaw D, Geyer R (1994) An analysis of factors determining the need for ventriculoperitoneal shunts after posterior fossa tumor surgery in children. Neurosurgery 34:402–408

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Di Rocco C, Cinalli G, Massimi L, Spennato P, Cianciulli E, Tamburrini G (2006) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the treatment of hydrocephalus in pediatric patients. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg 31:119–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fritsch MJ, Doerner L, Kienke S, Mehdorn M (2005) Hydrocephalus in children with posterior fossa tumors: the role of endoscopic third ventriculostomy. J Neurosurg 103:40–42

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fukuhara T, Vorster SJ, Luciano MG (2000) Risk factors for failure of endoscopic third ventriculostomy for obstructive hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 46:1100–1111

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gnanalingham KK, Lafuente J, Thompson D, Harkness W, Hayward R (2003) The natural history of ventriculomegaly and tonsillar herniation in children with posterior fossa tumors—an MRI study. Pediatr Neurosurg 39:246–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Govender ST, Nathoo N, van Dellen JR (2003) Evaluation of an antibiotic-impregnated shunt system for the treatment of hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 99:831–839

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Griwan MS, Sharma Shanker B, Kumar Mahajan R, Kumar Kak V (1993) Value of precraniotomy shunts in children with posterior fossa tumor. Child’s Nerv Syst 9:462–466

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jones FRC, Stening WA, Brydon M (1990) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Neurosurgery 26:86–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kombogiorgas D, Sgouros S, Walsh AR, Hockley AD, Stevens M, Grundy R, Peet A, English M, Spooner D (2007) Outcome of children with posterior fossa medulloblastoma: a single institution experience over the decade 1994–2003. Child’s Nerv Syst 23:399–405

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kumar V, Phipps K, Harkness W, Hayward RD (1996) Ventriculo-peritoneal shunt requirement in children with posterior fossa tumours: an 11-year audit. Br J Neurosurg 10:467–470

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee M, Wisoff JH, Abbott R, Freed D, Epstein FJ (1994) Management of hydrocephalus in children with medulloblastoma: prognostic factors for shunting. Pediatr Neurosurg 20:240–247

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Massimi L, Di Rocco C, Tamburrini G, Caldarelli M, Iannelli A (2004) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy complications and failures [Italian]. Minerva Pediatr 56:167–181

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. McLaurin RL (1985) On the use of pre-craniotomy shunting in the management of posterior fossa tumors in children. Concepts Pediatr Neurosurg 6:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  22. Morelli D, Pirotte B, Lubansu A, Detemmerman D, Fricx C, Berrè J, David P, Brotchi J (2005) Persistent hydrocephalus after early surgical management of posterior fossa tumors in children: is routine preoperative endoscopic third ventriculostomy justified? J Neurosurg 103:247–252

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pattavilakom A, Kotasnas D, Korman TM, Xenos C, Danks A (2006) Duration of in vivo antimicrobial activity of antibiotic-impregnated cerebrospinal fluid catheters. Neurosurgery 58:930–935

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Raimondi AJ, Tomita T (1981) Hydrocephalus and infratentorial tumours. Incidence, clinical picture and treatment. J Neurosurg 55:174–182

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rappaport ZH, Shalit MN (1989) Perioperative external ventricular drainage in obstructive hydrocephalus secondary to infratentorial brain tumours. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 96:118–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ruggiero C, Cinalli G, Spennato P, Aliberti F, Cianciulli E, Trischitta V, Maggi G (2004) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the treatment of hydrocephalus in posterior fossa tumors in children. Child’s Nerv Syst 20:828–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sainte-Rose C, Cinalli G, Roux FE, Maixner W, Chumas PD, Mannour M, Carpentier A, Bourgeois M, Zerah M, Pierre-Kahn A, Renier D (2001) Management of hydrocephalus in pediatric patients with posterior fossa tumors: the role of endoscopic third ventriculostomy. J Neurosurg 95:791–797

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Schijman E, Peter JC, Rekate HL, Sgouros S, Wong TT (2004) Management of hydrocephalus in posterior fossa tumors: how, what, when? Child’s Nerv Syst 20:192–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sciubba DM, Stuart RM, McGirt MJ, Woodworth GF, Samdani A, Carson B, Jallo GI (2005) Effect of antibiotic-impregnated shunt catheters in decreasing the incidence of shunt infection in the treatment of hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 103(2 suppl):131–136

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tamburrini G, Di Rocco C, Caldarelli M, Di Rocco F, Sabatino G, Koutzoglou M (2003) Postoperative third ventriculostomy in children with posterior cranial fossa tumors. Child’s Nerv Syst 19:691–692 (abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Taylor WAS, Todd NV, Leighton SEJ (1992) CSF drainage in patients with posterior fossa tumours. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 117:1–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Financial disclosure

The authors declare they do not have any financial interest in the materials presented and discussed in this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Massimi.

Additional information

Comment

This MS compares two groups of children with tumours. In both groups the patients received post - craniotomy EVD for pressure monitoring and CSF sampling. In Group 1, all received an antimicrobial EVD while the historical control Group 2 received a plain catheter. In terms of infective complications, study outcomes were infection rate, the need for EVD revision and hospital stay related to infection management. The policy for both groups included CSF sampling every 2 days, and immediate catheter replacement when a positive culture was reported. Probably because of this, no cases of clinical CSF space infection were seen in either group. However, the "infection" rates in Groups 1 and 2 were 2.1% and 31.8% respectively. Sampling of CSF during EVD without clinical indication (eg fever) is held to be a risk for infection. However, the findings here raise questions about this, and suggest that, if done with proper precaution, it might be clinically advantageous. The authors have reported a sequential study with historical controls, yet the results in terms of infection prevention are interesting. Prospective randomised controlled trials, with sufficient patients, are needed, as the authors say.

Dr Roger Bayston

University of Nottingham

Comment

This group have provided further information to a growing body of knowledge with respect to the use of antimicrobial impregnated catheters in reducing, and virtually eliminating infective complications. An interesting, unexplained observation is that in patients in which this particular technology has been used, there appears to be a general reduction of infective complications, including organisms not known to be particularly susceptible to the specific antimicrobial agents employed in this group of catheters. This may be an interesting area of future study. A further area of interest is the use of silver impregnation technology which extends the range of organism susceptibility.

Reduction of infections in children who have a documented higher infection risk in foreign material use is a high priority. Collecting information of sufficient statistical power a further challenge.

Van Dellen

Charing Cross Hospital, London

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tamburrini, G., Massimi, L., Caldarelli, M. et al. Antibiotic impregnated external ventricular drainage and third ventriculostomy in the management of hydrocephalus associated with posterior cranial fossa tumours. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 150, 1049–1056 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-008-0022-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-008-0022-6

Keywords

Navigation