Skip to main content
Log in

A Simple Model for Understanding the Origin of the Amide Proton Transfer MRI Signal in Tissue

  • Published:
Applied Magnetic Resonance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Amide proton transfer (APT) imaging is a new molecular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique that gives contrast at the cellular protein level. To better understand the origin of the APT signal in tissue, fresh and cooked hen eggs (n = 4) were imaged at 4.7 T. The APT effect was quantified using the asymmetry in the magnetization transfer ratio (MTRasym) at the composite amide proton resonance frequency (3.5 ppm from the water resonance). The measured APT signals were significantly higher in the fresh egg white (20.1 ± 0.9%) than in the fresh egg yolk (−1.4 ± 1.1%; P < 0.001), and in the cooked egg white (2.8 ± 0.7%; P < 0.001), all of which have similar absolute protein contents. The data support the notion that the APT effect observed in vivo is associated with mobile proteins in tissue, such as those in the cytoplasm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K.M. Ward, A.H. Aletras, R.S. Balaban, J. Magn. Reson. 143, 79–87 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Zhou, P.C. van Zijl, Progr. NMR Spectr. 48, 109–136 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. I. Hancu, W.T. Dixon, M. Woods, E. Vinogradov, A.D. Sherry, R.E. Lenkinski, Acta Radiol. 51, 910–923 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. N. Goffeney, J.W.M. Bulte, J. Duyn, L.H. Bryant, P.C.M. van Zijl, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 8628–8629 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Zhang, P. Winter, K. Wu, A.D. Sherry, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123(7), 1517–1578 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Aime, A. Barge, D. Delli Castelli, F. Fedeli, A. Mortillaro, F.U. Nielsen, E. Terreno, Magn. Reson. Med. 47, 639–648 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Zhou, J. Payen, D.A. Wilson, R.J. Traystman, P.C.M. van Zijl, Nature Med. 9, 1085–1090 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. K. Wuthrich, NMR of proteins and nucleic acids (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1986)

    Google Scholar 

  9. P.Z. Sun, J. Zhou, W. Sun, J. Huang, P.C.M. van Zijl, J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 27, 1129–1136 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. K.T. Jokivarsi, H.I. Grohn, O.H. Grohn, R.A. Kauppinen, Magn. Reson. Med. 57, 647–653 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Zhou, B. Lal, D.A. Wilson, J. Laterra, P.C.M. van Zijl, Magn. Reson. Med. 50, 1120–1126 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Salhotra, B. Lal, J. Laterra, P.Z. Sun, P.C.M. van Zijl, J. Zhou, NMR Biomed. 21, 489–497 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Zhou, J.O. Blakeley, J. Hua, M. Kim, J. Laterra, M.G. Pomper, P.C.M. van Zijl, Magn. Reson. Med. 60, 842–849 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Z. Wen, S. Hu, F. Huang, X. Wang, L. Guo, X. Quan, S. Wang, J. Zhou, NeuroImage 51, 616–622 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J. Zhou, E. Tryggestad, Z. Wen, B. Lal, T. Zhou, R. Grossman, S. Wang, K. Yan, D.-X. Fu, E. Ford, B. Tyler, J. Blakeley, J. Laterra, P.C.M. van Zijl, Nature Med. 17, 130–134 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. R. Jayasundar, S. Ayyar, P. Raghunathan, Magn. Reson. Imag. 15, 709–717 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. S.J. Graham, G.J. Stanisz, A. Kecojevic, M.J. Bronskill, R.M. Henkelman, Magn. Reson. Med. 42, 1061–1071 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. R.M. Henkelman, G.J. Stanisz, S.J. Graham, NMR Biomed. 14, 57–64 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. J. Hua, C.K. Jones, J. Blakeley, S.A. Smith, P.C.M. van Zijl, J. Zhou, Magn. Reson. Med. 58, 786–793 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. W. Ling, R.R. Regatte, G. Navon, A. Jerschow, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 2266–2270 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. T. Kaewmanee, S. Benjakul, W. Visessanguan, Food Chem. 112, 560–569 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. M.B. Smith, J.F. Back, Nature 193, 878–879 (1962)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Y. Mine, T. Noutomi, N. Haga, J. Agric. Food Chem. 38, 2122–2125 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. C. Guerin-Dubiard, M. Pasco, D. Molle, C. Desert, T. Croguennec, F. Nau, J. Agric. Food Chem. 54, 3901–3910 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. D.A. Omana, Y. Liang, N.N.V. Kav, J. Wu, Proteomics 11, 144–153 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Peter van Zijl for helpful comments and Ms. Mary McAllister for editorial assistance. This work was supported in part by grants from NIH (EB009112, EB009731), and the Dana Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinyuan Zhou.

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 Proteomic Analyses of the Fresh and Cooked Egg Whites

Protein extraction was performed using the PlusOne Sample Grinding Kit (GE Healthcare) according to the manufacture’s recommended protocol. Fresh and cooked egg white (~200 mg) were lysed with 1 mL lysis buffer (8 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 4% CHAPS, 1% DTT) separately. After centrifuging for 10 min at a maximum speed, clear supernatant was collected carefully. Protein labeling was performed for fluorescence two-dimensional (2-D) differential in-gel expression (DIGE) technology (GE Healthcare) according to the manufacturer’s recommended protocol. Each protein sample (50 μl) was labeled with a different fluorophore. The labeling mixture was subjected to 2D gel electrophoresis following protocols for pH 4–7. CyDye-labeled proteins were visualized using a Typhoon 9410 imager (GE Healthcare) and the images were shown in the black-white.

As reported previously [24, 25], several high-concentration proteins, such as ovalbumin, ovalbumin X, ovalbumin Y, ovotransferrin, ovoglycoprotein, ovoinhibitor, TENP, clusterin, and Hep21 protein, can be clearly observed in both fresh and cooked egg whites (Fig. 3). Of these, ovalbumin (45 kDa) is the most abundant protein that constitutes 54% of the total egg white proteins. Most proteins, including ovalbumin, didn’t show large changes after the thermal denaturation. However, the concentrations of ovotransferrin and ovoglycoprotein were decreased due to their heat-sensitive properties.

Fig. 3
figure 3

2D-DIGE images of the egg-white proteins from the fresh (left) and cooked (right) hen eggs. Nine large spots (ovalbumin, ovalbumin X, ovalbumin Y, ovotransferrin, ovoglycoprotein, ovoinhibitor, TENP, clusterin, Hep21 protein) are clearly visual in both gel images. The contents of most of these proteins were comparable in the two images, except two heat-sensitive proteins (ovotransferrin, ovoglycoprotein), whose concentrations reduced in the cooked case

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhou, J., Yan, K. & Zhu, H. A Simple Model for Understanding the Origin of the Amide Proton Transfer MRI Signal in Tissue. Appl Magn Reson 42, 393–402 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00723-011-0306-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00723-011-0306-5

Keywords

Navigation