Skip to main content
Log in

Subgrouping of gliomas on the basis of genetic profiles

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Brain Tumor Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Management of gliomas depends on histological diagnosis; there are, however, limitations to the systems presently used. Tumors in the same entity can have different clinical courses, especially when they are diagnosed as WHO grade II–III. Previous studies revealed that genetic subgrouping of gliomas provides useful information that could help establishment of treatment procedures on the basis of the genetic background of the tumors. Recently, the authors analyzed the chromosomal copy number aberrations (CNAs) of adult supratentorial gliomas by comparative genomic hybridization using microdissected tissue sections. The tumors were classified into subgroups according to chromosomal CNAs. WHO grade II–III gliomas contained a variety of genetic subgroups that correlated well with the clinical course. Of these, long progression-free survival was observed for tumors with +7q and those with −1p/19q, low-grade tumors of 2 major lineages, and, in our preliminary data, both were closely correlated with mutation of IDH1. Furthermore, in contrast with +7q tumors, the great majority of +7 or +7/−10q groups had wildtype IDH1. Genetic studies suggest that cytogenetic characterization may provide an additional classification system for gliomas, and new criteria could help to establish rational and objective means for analysis of treatment procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK (2007) WHO Classification of tumours of the central nervous system. IARC Press, Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vertosick FT Jr, Selker RG, Arena VC (1991) Survival of patients with well-differentiated astrocytomas diagnosed in the era of computed tomography. Neurosurgery 28:496–501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Coons SW, Johnson PC, Scheithauer BW, Yates AJ, Pearl DK (2000) Improving diagnostic accuracy and interobserver concordance in the classification and grading of primary gliomas. Cancer 79:1381–1393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aldape K, Simmons ML, Davis RL, Miike R, Wiencke J, Barger G, Lee M, Chen P, Wrensch M (2000) Discrepancies in diagnoses of neuroepithelial neoplasms: the San Francisco Bay Area Adult Glioma Study. Cancer 88:2342–2349

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Collins VP, James CD (1993) Gene and chromosomal alterations associated with the development of human gliomas. FASEB J 7:926–930

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kleihues P, Ohgaki H (1991) Primary and secondary glioblastoma: from concept to clinical diagnosis. Neuro-Oncology 1:44–51

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cairncross JG, Ueki K, Zlatescu MC, Lisle DK, Finkelstein DM, Hammond RR, Silver JS, Stark PC, Macdonald DR, Ino Y, Ramsay DA, Louis DN (1998) Specific genetic predictors of chemotherapeutic response and survival in patients with anaplastic oligodendrogliomas. J Natl Cancer Inst 90:1473–1479

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hirose Y, Aldape K, Takahashi M, Berger MS, Feuerstein BG (2001) Tissue microdissection and degenerate oligonucleotide-primed polymerase chain reaction (DOP-PCR) is an effective method to analyze genetic aberrations in invasive tumors. J Mol Diag 3:62–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Parsons DW, Jones S, Zhang X, Lin JC, Leary RJ, Angenendt P, Mankoo P, Carter H, Siu IM, Gallia GL, Olivi A, McLendon R, Rasheed BA, Keir S, Nikolskaya T, Nikolsky Y, Busam DA, Tekleab H, Diaz LA Jr, Hartigan J, Smith DR, Strausberg RL, Marie SK, Shinjo SM, Yan H, Riggins GJ, Bigner DD, Karchin R, Papadopoulos N, Parmigiani G, Vogelstein B, Velculescu VE, Kinzler KW (2008) An integrated genomic analysis of human glioblastoma multiforme. Science 321:1807–1812

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yan H, Parsons DW, Jin G, McLendon R, Rasheed BA, Yuan W, Kos I, Batinic-Haberle I, Jones S, Riggins GJ, Friedman H, Friedman A, Reardon D, Herndon J, Kinzler KW, Velculescu VE, Vogelstein B, Bigner DD (2009) IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas. N Engl J Med 360:765–773

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mohapatra G, Bollen AW, Kim DH, Lamborn K, Moore DH, Prados MD, Feuerstein BG (1998) Genetic analysis of glioblastoma multiforme provides evidence for subgroup within the grade. Genes Chromosom Cancer 21:195–206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nutt CL, Mani DR, Betensky RA, Tamayo P, Cairncross JG, Ladd C, Pohl U, Hartmann C, McLaughlin ME, Batchelor TT, Black PM, von Deimling A, Pomeroy SL, Golub TR, Louis DN (2003) Gene expression-based classification of malignant gliomas correlates better with survival than histological classification. Cancer Res 63:1602–1607

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Burton EC, Lamborn KR, Forsyth P, Scott J, O’Campo J, Uyehara-Lock J, Prados M, Berger M, Passe S, Uhm J, O’Neill BP, Jenkins RB, Aldape KD (2002) Aberrant p53, mdm2, and proliferation differ in glioblastomas from long-term compared with typical survivors. Clin Cancer Res 8:180–187

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mohapatra G, Bollen AW, Kim DH, Lamborn K, Moore DH, Prados MD, Feuerstein BG (1997) Analysis of brain tumor cell lines confirm a simple model of relationship among fluorescence in situ hybridization, DNA index, and comparative genomic hybridization. Genes Chromosom Cancer 20:311–319

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kunwar S, Mohapatra G, Bollen A, Lamborn KR, Prados M, Feuerstein BG (2001) Genetic subgroups of anaplastic astrocytomas correlate with patient age and survival. Cancer Res 61:7683–7688

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Burton EC, Lamborn KR, Feuerstein BG, Prados M, Scott J, Forsyth P, Passe S, Jenkins RB, Aldape KD (2002) Genetic aberrations defined by comparative genomic hybridization distinguish long-term from typical survivors of glioblastoma. Cancer Res 62:6205–6210

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jeuken JW, Sprenger SH, Vermeer H, Kappelle AC, Boerman RH, Wesseling P (2002) Chromosomal imbalances in primary oligodendroglial tumors and their recurrences: clues about malignant progression detected using comparative genomic hybridization. J Neurosurg 96:559–564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bigner SH, Matthews MR, Rasheed BK, Wiltshire RN, Friedman HS, Friedman AH, Stenzel TT, Dawes DM, McLendon RE, Bigner DD (1999) Molecular genetic aspects of oligodendrogliomas including analysis by comparative genomic hybridization. Am J Pathol 155:375–386

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hirose Y, Aldape KD, Chang S, Lamborn K, Berger MS, Feuerstein BG (2003) Grade II astrocytomas are subgrouped by chromosome aberrations. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 142:1–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nigro JM, Misra A, Zhang L, Smirnov I, Colman H, Griffin C, Ozburn N, Chen M, Pan E, Koul D, Yung WK, Feuerstein BG, Aldape KD (2005) Integrated array-comparative genomic hybridization and expression array profiles identify clinically relevant molecular subtypes of glioblastoma. Cancer Res 65:1678–1686

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Maher EA, Brennan C, Wen PY, Durso L, Ligon KL, Richardson A, Khatry D, Feng B, Sinha R, Louis DN, Quackenbush J, Black PM, Chin L, DePinho RA (2006) Marked genomic differences characterize primary and secondary glioblastoma subtypes and identify two distinct molecular and clinical secondary glioblastoma entities. Cancer Res 66:11502–11513

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Yin D, Ogawa S, Kawamata N, Tunici P, Finocchiaro G, Eoli M, Ruckert C, Huynh T, Liu G, Kato M, Sanada M, Jauch A, Dugas M, Black KL, Koeffler HP (2009) High-resolution genomic copy number profiling of glioblastoma multiforme by single nucleotide polymorphism DNA microarray. Mol Cancer Res 7:665–677

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Jenkins RB, Blair H, Ballman KV, Giannini C, Arusell RM, Law M, Flynn H, Passe S, Felten S, Brown PD, Shaw EG, Buckner JC (2006) A t(1;19)(q10;p10) mediates the combined deletions of 1p and 19q and predicts a better prognosis of patients with oligodendroglioma. Cancer Res 66:9852–9861

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hirose Y, Sasaki H, Miwa T, Ohba S, Ikeda E, Abe M, Ikeda S, Kobayashi M, Kawase T, Hasegawa M, Yoshida K (2011) Whole genome analysis from microdissected tissue revealed adult supratentorial grade II-III gliomas are divided into clinically relevant subgroups by genetic profile. Neurosurgery 69:376–390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Miwa T, Hirose Y, Sasaki H, Ikeda E, Yoshida K, Kawase T (2009) Genetic characterization of adult infratentorial gliomas. J Neurooncol 91:251–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Miwa T, Hirose Y, Sasaki H, Ezaki T, Yoshida K, Kawase T (2011) Single-copy gain of chromosome 1q is a negative prognostic marker in pediatric nonependymal, nonpilocytic gliomas. Neurosurgery 68:206–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ueki K, Nishikawa R, Nakazato Y, Hirose T, Hirato J, Funada N, Fujimaki T, Hojo S, Kubo O, Ide T, Usui M, Ochiai C, Ito S, Takahashi H, Mukasa A, Asai A, Kirino T (2002) Correlation of histology and molecular genetic analysis of 1p, 19q, 10q, TP53, EGFR, CDK4, and CDKN2A in 91 astrocytic and oligodendroglial tumors. Clin Cancer Res 8:196–201

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuichi Hirose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hirose, Y., Sasaki, H., Abe, M. et al. Subgrouping of gliomas on the basis of genetic profiles. Brain Tumor Pathol 30, 203–208 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10014-013-0148-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10014-013-0148-y

Keywords

Navigation