Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ethik der Reanimation und Entscheidungen am Lebensende

Abschnitt 8 der Leitlinien zur Reanimation 2005 des European Resuscitation Council

  • Schwerpunkt: ERC-Leitlinien
  • Published:
Notfall + Rettungsmedizin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Baskett PJ, Lim A (2004) The varying ethical attitudes towards resuscitation in Europe. Resuscitation 62: 267–273

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sprung CL, Cohen SL, Sjokvist P et al. (2003) End-of-life practices in European intensive care units: the Ethicus Study. JAMA 290: 790–797

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Richter J, Eisemann MR, Bauer B, Kreibeck H, Astrom S (2002) Decision-making in the treatment of elderly people: a cross-cultural comparison between Swedish and German physicians and nurses. Scand J Caring Sci 16: 149–156

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. da Costa DE, Ghazal H, Al Khusaiby S (2002) Do Not Resuscitate orders and ethical decisions in a neonatal intensive care unit in a Muslim community. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 86: 115–119

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ho NK (2001) Decision-making: initiation and withdrawing life support in the asphyxiated infants in developing countries. Singapore Med J 42: 402–405

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Richter J, Eisemann M, Zgonnikova E (2001) Doctors‘ authoritarianism in end-of-life treatment decisions. A comparison between Russia, Sweden and Germany. J Med Ethics 27: 186–191

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Cuttini M, Nadai M, Kaminski M et al. (2000) End-of-life decisions in neonatal intensive care: physicians‘ self-reported practices in seven European countries. EURONIC Study Group. Lancet 355: 2112–2118

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Konishi E (1998) Nurses‘ attitudes towards developing a do not resuscitate policy in Japan. Nurs Ethics 5: 218–227

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Muller JH, Desmond B (1992) Ethical dilemmas in a cross-cultural context. A Chinese example. West J Med 157: 323–327

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Edgren E (1992) The ethics of resuscitation; differences between Europe and the USA--Europe should not adopt American guidelines without debate. Resuscitation 23: 85–89

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Beauchamp TL, Childress J (eds) (1994) Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  12. Declaration of Helsinki (1964) Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects adopted by the 18th WMA General Assembly, Helsinki, Finland, June 1964 and amended at the 29th, 35th, 41st, 48th, and 52nd WMA Assemblies. Geneva, 1964

  13. Aasland OG, Forde R, Steen PA (2003) Medical end-of-life decisions in Norway. Resuscitation 57: 312–313

    Google Scholar 

  14. Danciu SC, Klein L, Hosseini MM, Ibrahim L, Coyle BW, Kehoe RF (2004) A predictive model for survival after in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest. Resuscitation 62: 35–42

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dautzenberg PL, Broekman TC, Hooyer C, Schonwetter RS, Duursma SA (1993) Review: patient-related predictors of cardiopulmonary resuscitation of hospitalized patients. Age Ageing 22: 464–475

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Haukoos JS, Lewis RJ, Niemann JT (2004) Prediction rules for estimating neurologic outcome following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 63: 145–155

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Herlitz J, Engdahl J, Svensson L, Young M, Angquist KA, Holmberg S (2004) Can we define patients with no chance of survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest? Heart 90: 1114–1118

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Herlitz J, Engdahl J, Svensson L, Angquist KA, Young M, Holmberg S (2005) Factors associated with an increased chance of survival among patients suffering from an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a national perspective in Sweden. Am Heart J 149: 61–66

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ebell MH (1992) Prearrest predictors of survival following in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a meta-analysis. J Fam Pract 34: 551–558

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hillman K, Parr M, Flabouris A, Bishop G, Stewart A (2001) Redefining in-hospital resuscitation: the concept of the medical emergency team. Resuscitation 48: 105–110

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. The MERIT study investigators (2005) Introduction of the medical emergency team (MET) system: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365: 2091–2097

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sovik O, Naess AC (1997) Incidence and content of written guidelines for „do not resuscitate“ orders. Survey at six different somatic hospitals in Oslo. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 117: 4206–4209

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bonnin MJ, Pepe PE, Kimball KT, Clark PS Jr (1993) Distinct criteria for termination of resuscitation in the out-of-hospital setting. JAMA 270: 1457–1462

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kellermann AL, Hackman BB, Somes G (1993) Predicting the outcome of unsuccessful prehospital advanced cardiac life support. JAMA 270: 1433–1436

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Steen S, Liao Q, Pierre L, Paskevicius A, Sjoberg T (2002) Evaluation of LUCAS, a new device for automatic mechanical compression and active decompression resuscitation. Resuscitation 55: 285–299

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Naess A, Steen E, Steen P (1997) Ethics in treatment decisions during out-of-hospital resuscitation. Resuscitation 35: 245–256

    Google Scholar 

  27. Joint Royal Colleges Ambulance Liaison Committee (2001) Newsletter 1996 and 2001. Royal College of Physicians., London

  28. Doyle CJ, Post H, Burney RE, Maino J, Keefe M, Rhee KJ (1987) Family participation during resuscitation: an option. Ann Emerg Med 16: 673–675

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Adams S, Whitlock M, Higgs R, Bloomfield P, Baskett PJ (1994) Should relatives be allowed to watch resuscitation? BMJ 308: 1687–1692

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Hanson C, Strawser D (1992) Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Foote Hospital emergency department’s nine-year perspective. J Emerg Nurs 18: 104–106

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cooke MW (1991) I desperately needed to see my son. BMJ 302: 1023

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Gregory CM (███) I should have been with Lisa as she died. Accid Emerg Nurs 3: 136–138

  33. Boie ET, Moore GP, Brummett C, Nelson DR (1999) Do parents want to be present during invasive procedures performed on their children in the emergency department? A survey of 400 parents. Ann Emerg Med 34: 70–74

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Boudreaux ED, Francis JL, Loyacano T (2002) Family presence during invasive procedures and resuscitations in the emergency department: a critical review and suggestions for future research. Ann Emerg Med 40: 193–205

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Martin J (1991) Rethinking traditional thoughts. J Emerg Nurs 17: 67–68

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Robinson SM, Mackenzie-Ross S, Campbell Hewson GL, Egleston CV, Prevost AT (1998) Psychological effect of witnessed resuscitation on bereaved relatives. Lancet 352: 614–617

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Baskett PJF (2004) The ethics of resuscitation. In: Colquhoun MC, Handley AJ, Evans TR (eds) The ABC of Resuscitation, 5th edn. BMJ Publishing Group, London

  38. Azoulay E, Sprung CL (2004) Family-physician interactions in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 32: 2323–2328

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bouchner H, Vinci R, Waring C (1989) Pediatric procedures: do parents want to watch? Pediatrics 84: 907–909

    Google Scholar 

  40. Resuscitation Council (UK) Project Team (1996) Should relatives witness resuscitation? Resuscitation Council, London, UK

  41. Morag RM, DeSouza S, Steen PA et al. (2005) Performing procedures on the newly deceased for teaching purposes: what if we were to ask? Arch Intern Med 165: 92–96

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. US Department of Health and Human Services (1996) Protection of Human Subjects: Informed Consent and Waiver of Informed Consent requirements in certain emergency circumstances. 61 Federal Register 51528 (1996) codified at CFR #50.24 and #46.408

    Google Scholar 

  43. Fontaine N, Rosengren B (2001) Directive/20/EC of the European Parliament and Council of 4th April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of trials on medical products for human use. J Europ Comm 121: 34–44

    Google Scholar 

  44. Lemaire F, Bion J, Blanco J et al. (2005) The European Union Directive on Clinical Research: present status of implementation in EU member states‘ legislations with regard to the incompetent patient. Intensive Care Med 31: 476–479

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Nichol G, Huszti E, Rokosh J, Dumbrell A, McGowan J, Becker L (2004) Impact of informed consent requirements on cardiac arrest research in the United States: exception from consent or from research? Resuscitation 62: 3–23

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Mosesso VN Jr, Brown LH, Greene HL et al. (2004) Conducting research using the emergency exception from informed consent: the Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) Trial experience. Resuscitation 61: 29–36

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Sterz F, Singer EA, Bottiger B et al. (2002) A serious threat to evidence based resuscitation within the European Union. Resuscitation 53: 237–238

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt:

Es besteht kein Interessenkonflikt. Der korrespondierende Autor versichert, dass keine Verbindungen mit einer Firma, deren Produkt in dem Artikel genannt ist, oder einer Firma, die ein Konkurrenzprodukt vertreibt, bestehen. Die Präsentation des Themas ist unabhängig und die Darstellung der Inhalte produktneutral.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Zentrum Anaesthesiologie, Rettungs- und Intensivmedizin, Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen

    P. J. F. Baskett, P. A. Steen, L. Bossaert &  J. Bahr

  2. Zentrum Anaesthesiologie, Rettungs- und Intensivmedizin, Georg-August-Universität, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen

    J. Bahr

Authors
  1. P. J. F. Baskett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. A. Steen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. L. Bossaert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. Bahr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Bahr.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baskett, P.J.F., Steen, P.A., Bossaert, L. et al. Ethik der Reanimation und Entscheidungen am Lebensende. Notfall + Rettungsmedizin 9, 155–163 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10049-006-0795-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10049-006-0795-1

Search

Navigation