Skip to main content
Log in

Q-switched double frequency Nd:YAG 532-nm nanosecond laser vs. double frequency Nd:YAG 532-nm picosecond laser for the treatment of solar lentigines in Asians

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Solar lentigines are common pigmentary lesions. Q-switched lasers are effective treatment options but postinflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) is common in darker skin. The objective of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety in solar lentigines of Asian skin treated by Q-switched potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) 532-nm nanosecond laser vs. KTP 532-nm picosecond laser for the treatment of solar lentigines in Asians. Thirty patients with at least 2 solar lentigines on the upper extremities were enrolled. A total of 30 paired lentiginous lesions were randomly treated with a single treatment of either Q-switched KTP 532-nm nanosecond laser vs. KTP 532-nm picosecond laser. In terms of efficacy, mean luminance score was evaluated at baseline, at 6th, and 12th week. Degree of pigment clearance was assessed by a blinded physician and the patients. Satisfaction score was rated by patients using visual analogue scale. Adverse events were also recorded. Twenty-eight patients completed the study. Both lasers showed significant improvement in mean luminance score from baseline (p < 0.05). Likewise, there was no significant difference in pigment clearance between two lasers either assessed by physician or patients. However, patients’ satisfaction score was significantly higher with the picosecond laser (p = 0.014). Adverse events and pain were not different between groups. Q-switched KTP 532-nm nanosecond laser and KTP 532-nm picosecond laser are safe and effective for treating solar lentigines in Asians. Based on cost-effectiveness, Q-switched KTP 532-nm nanosecond laser remains the main treatment while KTP 532-nm picosecond laser can be considered as a treatment option.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ortonne JP (1990) Pigmentary changes of the ageing skin. Br J Dermatol 122(Suppl 35):21–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vachiramon V, Panmanee W, Techapichetvanich T, Chanprapaph K (2016) Comparison of Q-switched Nd: YAG laser and fractional carbon dioxide laser for the treatment of solar lentigines in Asians. Lasers Surg Med 48:354–359. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ortonne JP, Pandya AG, Lui H, Hexsel D (2006) Treatment of solar lentigines. J Am Acad Dermatol 54:S262–S271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2005.12.043.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bogdan Allemann I, Goldberg DJ (2011) Benign pigmented lesions. Curr Probl Dermatol 42:81–96. https://doi.org/10.1159/000328267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang CC, Sue YM, Yang CH, Chen CK (2006) A comparison of Q-switched alexandrite laser and intense pulsed light for the treatment of freckles and lentigines in Asian persons: a randomized, physician-blinded, split-face comparative trial. J Am Acad Dermatol 54:804–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2006.01.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ross V, Naseef G, Lin G, Kelly M, Michaud N, Flotte TJ, Raythen J, Anderson RR (1998) Comparison of responses of tattoos to picosecond and nanosecond Q-switched neodymium: YAG lasers. Arch Dermatol 134:167–171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Levin MK, Ng E, Bae YS, Brauer JA, Geronemus RG (2016) Treatment of pigmentary disorders in patients with skin of color with a novel 755 nm picosecond, Q-switched ruby, and Q-switched Nd:YAG nanosecond lasers: a retrospective photographic review. Lasers Surg Med 48:181–187. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Guss L, Goldman MP, Wu DC (2017) Picosecond 532 nm neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet laser for the treatment of solar Lentigines in darker skin types: safety and efficacy. Dermatol Surg 43:456–459. https://doi.org/10.1097/dss.0000000000000922

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Negishi K, Akita H, Matsunaga Y (2018) Prospective study of removing solar lentigines in Asians using a novel dual-wavelength and dual-pulse width picosecond laser. Lasers Surg Med. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yoshimura K, Harii K, Aoyama T, Iga T (2000) Experience with a strong bleaching treatment for skin hyperpigmentation in Orientals. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:1097–1108 discussion 1109-1010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Todd MM, Rallis TM, Gerwels JW, Hata TR (2000) A comparison of 3 lasers and liquid nitrogen in the treatment of solar lentigines: a randomized, controlled, comparative trial. Arch Dermatol 136:841–846

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Li YT, Yang KC (1999) Comparison of the frequency-doubled Q-switched Nd:YAG laser and 35% trichloroacetic acid for the treatment of face lentigines. Dermatol Surg 25:202–204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Negishi K, Akita H, Tanaka S, Yokoyama Y, Wakamatsu S, Matsunaga K (2013) Comparative study of treatment efficacy and the incidence of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation with different degrees of irradiation using two different quality-switched lasers for removing solar lentigines on Asian skin. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 27:307–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04385.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Izikson L, Farinelli W, Sakamoto F, Tannous Z, Anderson RR (2010) Safety and effectiveness of black tattoo clearance in a pig model after a single treatment with a novel 758 nm 500 picosecond laser: a pilot study. Lasers Surg Med 42:640–646. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.20942

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Forbat E, Al-Niaimi F (2016) The use of picosecond lasers beyond tattoos. J Cosmet Laser Ther 18:345–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/14764172.2016.1188209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vasanop Vachiramon.

Ethics declarations

The study was approved by the Mahidol University Institutional Review Board of Human Rights Related to Research Involving Human Subjects, Mahidol University (Protocol number 086006). The study protocol complied with the guidelines of the declaration of Helsinki. Information on the study procedures, benefits, and potential side effects were given to the patients before enrolling the study. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient before study initiation

Role of the sponsors

None.

Conflict on interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vachiramon, V., Iamsumang, W. & Triyangkulsri, K. Q-switched double frequency Nd:YAG 532-nm nanosecond laser vs. double frequency Nd:YAG 532-nm picosecond laser for the treatment of solar lentigines in Asians. Lasers Med Sci 33, 1941–1947 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-018-2560-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-018-2560-3

Keywords

Navigation