Skip to main content
Log in

Number of positive radiographic findings in pediatric trauma patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Conventional radiography is frequently performed in pediatric patients in whom fractures and dislocations are suspected. However, until now, the rate of positive findings of the most commonly performed radiographic examinations in pediatric patients is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the number of positive findings in the 20 most frequently requested standard radiographic examinations in pediatric patients in a level 1 trauma center systematically.

Methods

A transversal cohort study was conducted at a level 1 trauma center in Germany (2008–2014). In a statistical pre hoc analysis, a sample size of 200 images of each standard radiograph was determined. The picture archiving and communication system (PACS) was searched for radiographic examinations in patients under 18 years.

Results

The following fracture rates for the investigated 20 most common examinations were found: 70.5% clavicle, 54.5% forearm, 53% wrist, 41.5% elbow, 30.5% lower leg, 20% hand, 18.5% finger, 12.5% toe, 12% forefoot, 11.5% ankle, 9% shoulder, 6.5% patella, 5.5% foot, 4% knee, 2% conventional rib series, 1.5% lumbar spine, 1% Towne view, 0.5% skull, 0% cervical spine, and 0% odontoid. Differences in the mean age of analyzed pediatric trauma patients in correlation to different standard radiographs were found.

Conclusions

In our study, a relevant amount of different standard radiographs revealed a low fracture rate. Therefore, indications for X-ray should be checked properly and alternative procedures should be discussed with the patient and the parents. Clinical decision rules should be developed and pathways have to be implemented to minimize radiation exposure, waiting time, and costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zylka-Menhorn V (2011) Zentrale Notaufnahme – Diskurs über die organisatorische Form der Erstbehandlung hält an. Dtsch Arztebl 108(30):1619A

    Google Scholar 

  2. Slaar A, Bentohami A, Kessels J et al (2012) The role of plain radiography in paediatric wrist trauma. Insights Imaging 3:513–517

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ackermann O (2010) Sonographic diagnostics of proximal humerus fractures in juveniles. Unfallchirurg 113:839–844

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ackermann O, Liedgens P, Eckert K et al (2009) Ultrasound diagnosis of forearm fractures in children. A prospective multicenter study. Unfallchirurg 112:706–711

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Eckert K, Ackermann O (2014) Sonographic fracture diagnosis in children. Unfallchirurg 117:355–368

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ruffing T, Arend G, Forster J et al (2015) Emergency radiographs in injured children and adolescents. Unfallchirurg 118:607–614

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Frush DP, Frush KS (2008) The ALARA concept in pediatric imaging: building bridges between radiology and emergency medicine: consensus conference on imaging safety and quality for children in the emergency setting. Pediatr Radiol 38:629–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Petit P, Sapin C, Henry G et al (2001) Rate of abnormal osteoarticular radiographic findings in pediatric patients. AJR 176:987–990

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wildberger JE, Alzen G, Eschmann SM et al (1995) Efficiency and efficacy of radiologic diagnosis in skeletal trauma in childhood and adolescence. Radiologe 35:397–400

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cohen DM, Jasser JW, Kean JR et al (1998) Clinical criteria for using radiography for children with acute injuries. Pediatr Emerg Care 14:185–187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoffman JR, Wolfson AB, Todd K et al (1998) For the NEXUS group. Selective cervical spine radiography in blunt trauma: methodology of the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS). Ann Emerg 32:461–469

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen KL et al (2001) The Canadian C-spine Rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. JAMA 286:1841–1848

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dowling S, Spooner CH, Liang Y et al (2009) Accuracy of Ottawa Ankle Rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and midfoot in children: a meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med 16:277–287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Viccellio P, Simon H, Pressman BD et al (2001) A prospective multicenter study of cervical spine injury in children. Pediatrics 108:E2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Leitlinie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neonatologie und Pädiatrische Intensivmedizin et al. Das Schädel-Hirn-Trauma im Kindesalter. AWMF-Leitlinienregister Nr. 024/018 http://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/024-018l_S2k_Schaedel-Hirn-Trauma_im_Kindesalter-2011-03.pdf

  16. Holmes JF, Sokolove PE, Brant WE et al (2002) A clinical decision rule for identifying children with thoracic injuries after blunt torso trauma. Ann Emerg Med 39:492–499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hoffstetter P, Dornia C, Wagner M et al (2014) Clinical significance of conventional rib series in patients with minor thoracic trauma. Fortschr Röntgenstr 186:876–880

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pauzé DR, Pauzé DK (2013) Emergency management of blunt chest trauma in children: an evidence-based approach. Pediatr Emerg Med Pract 10:1–22

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Slaar A, Walenkamp MMJ, Bentohami A et al (2015) A clinical decision rule for the use of plain radiography in children after acute wrist injury: development and external validation of the Amsterdam Pediatric Wrist Rules. Pediatr Radiol. doi:10.1007/s00247-015-3436-3

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Saul T, Ng L, Lewiss RE (2013) Point-of-care ultrasound in the diagnosis of upper extremity fracture-dislocation. A pictorial essay. Med Ultrason 15(3):230–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Ruffing.

Ethics declarations

The institutional review board for clinical research at Westpfalz-Klinikum GmbH Kaiserslautern approved the use of medical records for this retrospective study (No. 241 E).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ruffing, T., Danko, T., Henzler, T. et al. Number of positive radiographic findings in pediatric trauma patients. Emerg Radiol 24, 281–286 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-017-1482-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-017-1482-x

Keywords

Navigation