Abstract
Faecal incontinence and urinary incontinence are common and often associated. Sacral neurostimulation is a validated technique for treating each of these two types of incontinence, taken separately. The purpose of this study was to review the literature on the results of this treatment for double incontinence. A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library using the keywords “faecal incontinence”, “anal incontinence”, “urinary incontinence”, “urgency”, “urinary disorder”, “neurostimulation”, “sacral nerve stimulation” and “electric nerve stimulation”. We limited the search to English-language articles on faecal and urinary incontinence in adults published from 1995 to the present. We identified six articles, comprising 113 patients who were followed for 3–62 months. Improved faecal incontinence was observed in 44–100 % of cases, while improved urinary incontinence was observed in 20–100 % of cases. Patient satisfaction with the correction of double incontinence, both anal and urinary, was highly variable, ranging from 20 to 100 %. As anal incontinence and urinary incontinence are often associated and are sometimes responsive to sacral neuromodulation, it seems attractive to provide such treatment for double incontinence, to improve both digestive and urinary symptoms.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Whitehead WE, Borrud L, Goode PS et al (2009) Fecal incontinence in US adults: epidemiology and risk factors. Gastroenterology 137:512–517
Damon H, Schott AM, Barth X, Faucheron JL, Abramowitz L, Siproudhis L, French ORALIA Group (2008) Clinical characteristics and quality of life in a cohort of 621 patients with faecal incontinence. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:845–851
Gonzalez-Argente FX, Jain A, Nogueras JJ, Davila GW, Weiss EG, Wexner SD (2001) Prevalence and severity of urinary incontinence and pelvic genital prolapse in females with anal incontinence or rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 44:920–926
Norton P, Brubaker L (2006) Urinary incontinence in women. Lancet 367:57–67
Meschia M, Buonaguidi A, Pifarotti P, Somigliana E, Spennacchio M, Amicarelli F (2002) Prevalence of anal incontinence in women with symptoms of urinary incontinence and genital prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 100:719–723
Leroi AM, Lenne X, Dervaux B et al (2011) Outcome and cost analysis of sacral nerve modulation for treating urinary and/or fecal incontinence. Ann Surg 253:720–732
Faucheron JL, Chodez M, Boillot B (2012) Neuromodulation for fecal and urinary incontinence: functional results in 57 consecutive patients from a single institution. Dis Colon Rectum 55:1278–1283
Leroi AM, Michot F, Grise P, Denis P (2001) Effect of sacral nerve stimulation in patients with fecal and urinary incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 44:779–789
Ganio E, Ratto C, Masin A et al (2001) Neuromodulation for fecal incontinence: outcome in 16 patients with definitive implant. Dis Colon Rectum 44:965–970
Uludag O, Koch SM, van Gemert WG, Dejong CH, Baeten CG (2004) Sacral neuromodulation in patients with fecal incontinence: a single-center study. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1350–1357
Altomare DF, Rinaldi M, Petrolino M et al (2004) Permanent sacral nerve modulation for fecal incontinence and associated urinary disturbances. Int J Colorectal Dis 19:203–209
El-Gazzaz G, Zutshi M, Salcedo L, Hammel J, Rackley R, Hull T (2009) Sacral neuromodulation for the treatment of fecal incontinence and urinary incontinence in female patients: long-term follow-up. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:1377–1381
Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–79
Thin NN, Horrocks EJ, Hotouras A et al (2013) Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of neuromodulation in the treatment of faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 100:1430–1447
Faucheron JL, Voirin D, Badic B (2010) Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: causes of surgical revision from a series of 87 consecutive patients operated on in a single institution. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1501–1507
Faucheron JL, Herault MC (2012) Life threatening haemorrhage after electrode removal: a severe complication following sacral nerve stimulation procedure for the treatment of faecal incontinence. Colorectal Dis 14:133
Matzel KE, Stadelmaier U, Hohenfellner M, Gall FP (1995) Electrical stimulation of sacral spinal nerves for treatment of fecal incontinence. Lancet 346:1124–1127
Whorwell PJ, Lupton EW, Erduran D, Wilson K (1986) Bladder smooth muscle dysfunction in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Gut 27:1014–1017
Lemieux MC, Kamm MA, Fowler CJ (1993) Bowel dysfunction in young women with urinary retention. Gut 34:1397–1399
Jackson SL, Weber AM, Hull TL et al (1997) Fecal incontinence in women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 89:423–427
Wyndaele M, De Winter BY, Pelckmans P, Wyndaele JJ (2011) Lower bowel function in urinary incontinent women, urinary continent women, and in controls. Neurourol Urodyn 30:138–143
Soligo M, Salvatore S, Milani R et al (2003) Double incontinence in urogynecologic practice: a new insight. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:438–443
Cukier JM, Cortina-Borja M, Brading AF (1997) A case-control study to examine any association between idiopathic detrusor instability and gastrointestinal tract disorder, and between irritable bowel syndrome and urinary tract disorder. Br J Urol 79:865–878
Leroi AM (2011) The role of sacral neuromodulation in double incontinence. Colorectal Dis 13(Suppl 2):15–18
Oerlemans DJ, van Kerrebroeck PE (2008) Sacral nerve stimulation for neuromodulation of the lower urinary tract. Neurourol Urodyn 27:28–33
Van Kerrebroeck PEV, van Voskuilen AC, Heesakkers JPFA et al (2007) Results of sacral neuromodulation therapy for urinary voiding dysfunction: outcomes of a prospective, worldwide clinical study. J Urol 178:2029–2034
Siddiqui NY, Wu JM, Amundsen CL (2010) Efficacy and adverse events of sacral nerve stimulation for overactive bladder: a systematic review. Neurourol Urodyn 29:S18–S23
Al-Zahrani AA, Elzayat EA, Gajewski JB (2011) Long-term outcome and surgical interventions after sacral neuromodulation implant for lower urinary tract symptoms: 14-year experience at 1 center. J Urol 185:981–986
Monga AK, Tracey MR, Subbaroyan J (2012) A systematic review of clinical studies of electrical stimulation for treatment of lower urinary tract dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J 23:993–1005
Faucheron JL, Bost R, Duffournet V, Dupuy S, Cardin N, Bonaz B (2006) Sacral neuromodulation in the treatment of severe anal incontinence. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 30:669–672
Leroi AM, Damon H, Faucheron JL et al (2009) Sacral nerve stimulation in faecal incontinence: position statement based on a collective experience. Colorectal Dis 11:572–583
Faucheron JL, Risse O, Desroches E (2002) Technique: la réparation sphinctérienne anale directe. J Chir 139:156–159
Wexner SD, Coller JA, Devroede G et al (2010) Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: results of a 120-patient prospective multicenter study. Ann Surg 251:441–449
Jarrett ME, Varma JS, Duthie GS, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA (2004) Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence in the UK. Br J Surg 91:755–761
Matzel KE, Kamm MA, Strosser M et al (2004) Sacral spinal nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: multicentre study. Lancet 363:1270–1276
Faucheron JL, Martin G (2004) Sacral neuromodulation for bowel dysfunction. Tech Coloproctol 18:3–4
Dudding TC (2011) Future indications for sacral nerve stimulation. Colorectal Dis 13(Suppl 2):23–28
Leong RK, Marcelissen TA, Nieman FH et al (2011) Satisfaction and patient experience with sacral neuromodulation: results of a single center sample survey. J Urol 185:588–592
Gill BC, Swartz MA, Rackley RR, Moore CK, Goldman HB, Vasavada SP (2012) Improvement of bowel dysfunction with sacral neuromodulation for refractory urge urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 23:735–741
Falletto E, Ganio E, Naldini G, Ratto C, Altomare DF (2014) Sacral neuromodulation for bowel dysfunction: a consensus statement from the Italian group. Tech Coloproctol 18:53–64
Acknowledgments
Many thanks to Mrs. Alison Foote for correcting our English text.
Conflict of interest
Bernard Boillot and Jean-Luc Faucheron have received a stipend from the Medtronic Corporation for oral presentations in conferences and teaching seminars on the technique. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chodez, M., Trilling, B., Thuillier, C. et al. Results of sacral nerve neuromodulation for double incontinence in adults. Tech Coloproctol 18, 1147–1151 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-014-1231-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-014-1231-z