Abstract
Background
Obstetric anal sphincter injury is the most frequent cause of fecal incontinence (FI) in young women. However, the relationship between the extent of anal sphincter defects and the severity of long-term FI (at least 1 year after delivery) has been poorly studied. The aim of the present study was to determine if, in the long term, the extent of anal sphincter defects graded at anal endosonography was linked with the severity of FI.
Methods
A retrospective study was conducted on women with a history of vaginal delivery, who presented with FI and had three-dimensional anorectal high-resolution manometry and endoanal ultrasound in our center from January 2015 to 2016. The detailed clinical history of each patient was obtained from the institutional database. The severity of FI was assessed with the Jorge and Wexner continence scale.
Results
There were 250 women with a mean age of 60 ± 14 years. Seventy-six (30.4%) had an isolated defect of the internal anal sphincter, 21 (8.4%) had an isolated defect of the external anal sphincter, and 150 (60%) had both internal and external sphincter defects. The extent of IAS and EAS defects was proportionally correlated with the decrease in mean resting anal pressure (p < 0.01) and the decrease in mean squeeze pressure (p = 0.013) measured by 3DHRAM. No significant correlation was found between the extent and location of the defect (IAS, EAS or both) on endoanal ultrasound and the severity of FI. Menopause was the only independent factor significantly associated with the severity of FI.
Conclusions
In our study, no significant correlation was observed between the extent of the anal sphincter defect and the severity of FI. Menopause was the only identified and independent risk factor for FI. These data confirm that, in the long-term, FI is often multifactorial.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Macmillan AK, Merrie AE, Marshall RJ, Parry BR (2004) The prevalence of fecal incontinence in community-dwelling adults: a systematic review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 47(8):1341–1349
Makol A, Grover M, Whitehead WE (2008) Fecal incontinence in women: causes and treatment. Womens Health (Lond) 4(5):517–528
Kamm MA (1994) Obstetric damage and faecal incontinence. Lancet 344(8924):730–733
Tetzschner T, Sorensen M, Lose G, Christiansen J (1996) Anal and urinary incontinence in women with obstetric anal sphincter rupture. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 103(10):1034–1040
Sangalli MR, Floris L, Faltin D, Weil A (2000) Anal incontinence in women with third or fourth degree perineal tears and subsequent vaginal deliveries. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 40(3):244–248
Guzman Rojas RA, Salvesen KA, Volloyhaug I (2018) Anal sphincter defects and fecal incontinence 15-24 years after first delivery: a cross-sectional study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 51(5):677–683
Blomquist JL, Munoz A, Carroll M, Handa VL (2018) Association of delivery mode with pelvic floor disorders after childbirth. JAMA 320(23):2438–2447
Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Thomas JM, Bartram CI (1993) Anal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med 329(26):1905–1911
Snooks SJ, Setchell M, Swash M, Henry MM (1984) Injury to innervation of pelvic floor sphincter musculature in childbirth. Lancet 2(8402):546–550
Snooks SJ, Swash M, Mathers SE, Henry MM (1990) Effect of vaginal delivery on the pelvic floor: a 5-year follow-up. Br J Surg 77(12):1358–1360
Burnett SJ, Spence-Jones C, Speakman CT, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Bartram CI (1991) Unsuspected sphincter damage following childbirth revealed by anal endosonography. Br J Radiol 64(759):225–227
Deen KI, Kumar D, Williams JG, Olliff J, Keighley MR (1993) The prevalence of anal sphincter defects in faecal incontinence: a prospective endosonic study. Gut 34(5):685–688
Norderval S, Nsubuga D, Bjelke C, Frasunek J, Myklebust I, Vonen B (2004) Anal incontinence after obstetric sphincter tears: incidence in a Norwegian county. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83(10):989–994
Rasmussen OO, Puggaard L, Christiansen J (1999) Anal sphincter repair in patients with obstetric trauma: age affects outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 42(2):193–195
Vitton V, Soudan D, Siproudhis L et al (2014) Treatments of faecal incontinence: recommendations from the French national society of coloproctology. Colorectal Dis 16(3):159–166
Benezech A, Bouvier M, Vitton V (2016) Faecal incontinence: current knowledges and perspectives. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol 7(1):59–71
Chan MK, Tjandra JJ (2008) Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: external anal sphincter defect vs. intact anal sphincter. Dis Colon Rectum 51(7):1015–1024 (discussion 1024-5)
Ratto C, Litta F, Parello A, Donisi L, De Simone V, Zaccone G (2012) Sacral nerve stimulation in faecal incontinence associated with an anal sphincter lesion: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 14(6):e297–e304
Oberwalder M, Dinnewitzer A, Baig MK et al (2004) The association between late-onset fecal incontinence and obstetric anal sphincter defects. Arch Surg 139(4):429–432
Soerensen MM, Pedersen BG, Santoro GA, Buntzen S, Bek K, Laurberg S (2014) Long-term function and morphology of the anal sphincters and the pelvic floor after primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injury. Colorectal Dis 16(10):O347–O355
De Leeuw JW, Vierhout ME, Struijk PC, Hop WC, Wallenburg HC (2001) Anal sphincter damage after vaginal delivery: functional outcome and risk factors for fecal incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80(9):830–834
Linneberg S, Leenskjold S, Glavind K (2016) A five year follow-up of women with obstetric anal sphincter rupture at their first delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 203:315–319
Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36(1):77–97
Cheeney G, Remes-Troche JM, Attaluri A, Rao SS (2011) Investigation of anal motor characteristics of the sensorimotor response (SMR) using 3-D anorectal pressure topography. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 300(2):G236–G240
Abramowitz L, Sobhani I, Ganansia R et al (2000) Are sphincter defects the cause of anal incontinence after vaginal delivery? Results of a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 43(5):590–596 (discussion 596-8)
Donnelly V, Fynes M, Campbell D, Johnson H, O’Connell PR, O’Herlihy C (1998) Obstetric events leading to anal sphincter damage. Obstet Gynecol 92(6):955–961
Andrews V, Sultan AH, Thakar R, Jones PW (2006) Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective study. Birth 33(2):117–122
Oberwalder M, Connor J, Wexner SD (2003) Meta-analysis to determine the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter damage. Br J Surg 90(11):1333–1337
Bartram CI, Sultan AH (1995) Anal endosonography in faecal incontinence. Gut 37(1):4–6
Richter HE, Fielding JR, Fielding CS et al (2006) Endoanal ultrasound findings and fecal incontinence symptoms in women with and without recognized anal sphincter tears. Obstet Gynecol 108(6):1394–1401
Andrews V, Sultan AH, Thakar R, Jones PW (2006) Occult anal sphincter injuries—myth or reality? BJOG 113(2):195–200
Mahony R, Behan M, Daly L, Kirwan C, O’Herlihy C, O’Connell PR (2007) Internal anal sphincter defect influences continence outcome following obstetric anal sphincter injury. Am J Obstet Gynecol 196(3):217e1-5
Norderval S, Markskog A, Rossaak K, Vonen N (2008) Correlation between anal sphincter defects and anal incontinence following obstetric sphincter tears: assessment using scoring systems for sonographic classification of defects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31(1):78–84
Starck M, Bohe M, Valentin L (2006) The extent of endosonographic anal sphincter defects after primary repair of obstetric sphincter tears increases over time and is related to anal incontinence. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 27(2):188–197
Cerro CR, Franco EM, Santoro GA, Palau MJ, Wieczorek P, Espuna-Pons M (2017) Residual defects after repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries and pelvic floor muscle strength are related to anal incontinence symptoms. Int Urogynecol J 28(3):455–460
Voyvodic F, Rieger NA, Skinner S et al (2003) Endosonographic imaging of anal sphincter injury: does the size of the tear correlate with the degree of dysfunction? Dis Colon Rectum 46(6):735–741
Zetterstrom JP, Lopez A, Anzen B, Dolk A, Norman M, Mellgren A (1999) Anal incontinence after vaginal delivery: a prospective study in primiparous women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 106(4):324–330
Ros C, Martinez-Franco E, Wozniak MM et al (2017) Postpartum two- and three-dimensional ultrasound evaluation of anal sphincter complex in women with obstetric anal sphincter injury. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 49(4):508–514
Fornell EU, Matthiesen L, Sjodahl R, Berg G (2005) Obstetric anal sphincter injury ten years after: subjective and objective long term effects. BJOG 112(3):312–316
Nygaard IE, Rao SS, Dawson JD (1997) Anal incontinence after anal sphincter disruption: a 30-year retrospective cohort study. Obstet Gynecol 89(6):896–901
Rao SS (2004) Pathophysiology of adult fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 126(1 Suppl 1):S14–S22
Mous M, Muller SA, de Leeuw JW (2008) Long-term effects of anal sphincter rupture during vaginal delivery: faecal incontinence and sexual complaints. BJOG 115(2):234–238
Haadem K, Gudmundsson S (1997) Can women with intrapartum rupture of anal sphincter still suffer after-effects two decades later? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 76(6):601–603
Faltin DL, Otero M, Petignat P et al (2006) Women’s health 18 years after rupture of the anal sphincter during childbirth: i. Fecal incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194(5):1255–1259
Whitehead WE, Borrud L, Goode PS et al (2009) Fecal incontinence in US adults: epidemiology and risk factors. Gastroenterology 137(2):512–517 (517 e1-2)
Damon H, Guye O, Seigneurin A et al (2006) Prevalence of anal incontinence in adults and impact on quality-of-life. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 30(1):37–43
Funding
The authors declare that they have no funding source.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
For this type of study (retrospective) formal consent is not required.
Informed consent
This is a retrospective study and according to French legislation on clinical trials at the time of the study, there was no need for patient consent. The data used were anonymized and collected from the APHM computer file which is declared to the Commission Nationale Informatique et Liberté (French National Commission for Data Protection).
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Luciano, L., Bouvier, M., Baumstarck, K. et al. Is the extent of obstetric anal sphincter injury correlated with the severity of fecal incontinence in the long term?. Tech Coloproctol 24, 49–55 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-019-02128-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-019-02128-1