Skip to main content
Log in

The role of biomedical knowledge in diagnosis of difficult clinical cases

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Advances in Health Sciences Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although biomedical knowledge is believed to be of little value in diagnosis of routine clinical cases, studies of clinical reasoning have found that physicians revert to use of basic biomedical knowledge when faced with challenging clinical problems. The current paper presents two experiments that empirically examine the role of biomedical knowledge in diagnosis of difficult cases by novice diagnosticians. Novices are taught to diagnose a series of artificial diseases using either knowledge of causal mechanisms or a list of clinical features. In Experiment 1, participants are then tested on two types of clinical challenges: (1) case summaries with irrelevant findings; (2) cases using unfamiliar terminology. Participants with an understanding of underlying mechanisms out performed their counterparts on both types of cases. In Experiment 2, participants are tested 1 week after initial training. Participants with knowledge of causal mechanisms were found to do better on cases with unfamiliar terminology. The results of the two studies provide additional support for the critical role of biomedical knowledge in diagnosis of difficult clinical cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adelson, B. (1984). When novices surpass experts: The difficulty of a task may increase with expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18, 483–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dore, K. L., Weaver, B., & Norman, G. R. (2003, November). What’s in a word: The impact specific words on diagnostic judgment. Poster session presented at 114th AAMC annual meeting, Washington, DC.

  • Eva, K. W., Brooks, L. R., & Norman, G. R. (2001). Does “Shortness of breath”=“dyspnea”? The biasing effect of feature instantiation in medical diagnosis. Academic Medicine, 76, S11–S13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eva, K. W., Norman, G. R., Neville, A. J., Wood, T. J., & Brooks, L. R. (2002). Expert–novice differences in memory: A reformulation. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 14, 257–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, G. M., & Patel, V. L. (1990). Domain knowledge and hypothesis generation in diagnostic reasoning. Medical Decision Making, 10, 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesgold, A. M., Rubinson, H., Felovich, P. J., Glaser, R., Klopfer, D., & Wang, Y. (1988). Expertise a complex skill: Diagnosing X-ray pictures. In: M. T. H. Chi, R. Glaser, & M. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. 311–342). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, G. R., Arfai, B., Gupta, A., Brooks, L. R., & Eva, K. W. (2003). The privileged status of prestigious terminology: Impact of “medicalese” on clinical judgments. Academic Medicine, 78, S82–S84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, G. R., & Brooks, L. R. (1997). The non-analytical basis of clinical reasoning. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2, 173–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, G. R., Trott, A. D., Brooks, L. R., & Smith, E. K. (1994). Cognitive differences in clinical reasoning related to postgraduate training. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 6, 114–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, V. L., Evans, D. A., & Groen, G. J. (1989). Reconciling basic science and clinical reasoning. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 1, 116–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel, V. L., Evans, D. A., & Kaufman, D. R. (1990). Reasoning strategies and the use of biomedical knowledge by medical students. Medical Education, 24, 129–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel, V. L., Groen, G. J., & Arocha, J. F. (1990). Medical expertise as a function of task difficulty. Memory & Cognition, 18, 394–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rikers, R., Winkel, W. T., Loyens, S., & Schmidt, H. (2003). Clinical case processing by medical experts and subexperts. Journal of Psychology, 137, 213–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rikers, R. M., Loyens, S. M., & Schmidt, H. G. (2004). The role of encapsulated knowledge in clinical case representations of medical students and family doctors. Medical Education, 38, 1035–1043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H. G., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (1993). On the origin of intermediate effects in clinical case recall. Memory & Cognition, 21, 338–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H. G., Norman, G. R., & Boshuizen, H. P. (1990). A cognitive perspective on medical expertise: Theory and implication. Academic Medicine, 65, 611–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicole N. Woods.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Woods, N.N., Brooks, L.R. & Norman, G.R. The role of biomedical knowledge in diagnosis of difficult clinical cases. Adv in Health Sci Educ 12, 417–426 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-006-9054-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-006-9054-y

Keywords

Navigation