Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Men’s Preferences for Women’s Breast Morphology in New Zealand, Samoa, and Papua New Guinea

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sexual selection via mate choice may have influenced the evolution of women’s breast morphology. We conducted an image-based questionnaire quantifying and comparing the preferences of men from Papua New Guinea (PNG), Samoa, and New Zealand (NZ) for images of women’s breast size, breast symmetry, areola size, and areolar pigmentation. Results showed that men from PNG preferred larger breasts to a greater extent than men from Samoa and NZ, providing some support for the hypothesis that men from subsistence living cultures have a greater preference for morphological cues indicative of caloric reserves. Symmetrical breasts were most attractive to men in each culture. However, preferences were highest among NZ men, followed by men from Samoa, and were lowest among men from PNG. These results did not support the hypothesis that people living in higher pathogen environments have a greater preference for traits indicative of pathogen resistance and developmental stability. Large areolae were preferred among men from PNG, and to a lesser extent in Samoa, while in NZ men preferred medium-sized areolae. Thus, men’s preferences for women’s areolar size appear to be highly culturally specific. Darkly pigmented areolae were most attractive to men from Samoa and PNG, whereas men from NZ preferred areolae with medium pigmentation. These findings suggest that areolar pigmentation indicative of sexual maturity is preferred by men rather than lighter pigmentation, which may signal that a woman is in the early years of reproductive maturity. This study highlights the importance of cross-cultural research when testing the role of morphological cues in mate choice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, A. (1983). The reproductive role of the human breast. Current Anthropology, 24, 25–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. L. (1988). Breasts, hips and buttocks revisited. Ethology and Sociobiology, 9, 319–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. L., Crawford, C. B., Nadeau, J., & Lindberg, T. (1992). Was the Duchess of Windsor right? A cross-cultural review of the socioecology of ideals of female body shape. Ethology and Sociobiology, 13, 197–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, N. (1995). The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 395–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biro, F. M., Falkner, F., Khoury, P., Morrison, J., & Lucky, A. (1992). Areolar and breast staging in adolescent girls. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, 5, 271–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. P., La, H., Ringrose, C., Hyland, R. E., Cole, A. A., & Brotherston, T. M. (1999). A method for assessing female breast morphometry and its clinical application. British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 52, 353–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (2003). The evolution of desire (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cant, J. G. H. (1981). Hypothesis for the evolution of human breasts and buttocks. The American Naturalist, 117, 199–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caro, T. M. (1987). Human breasts: Unsupported hypotheses reviewed. Human Evolution, 2, 271–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caro, T. M., & Sellen, D. W. (1990). The reproductive advantages of fat in women. Ethology and Sociobiology, 11, 51–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, L. E. J., & Heath, B. H. (1990). Somatotyping: Development and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarys, J. P., Martin, A. D., & Drinkwater, D. T. (1984). Gross tissue weights in the human body by cadaver dissection. Human Biology, 56, 459–473.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dufour, D. L., & Slather, M. L. (2002). Comparative and evolutionary dimensions of the energetics of human pregnancy and lactation. American Journal of Human Biology, 14, 584–602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, C. S., & Beach, F. A. (1951). Patterns of sexual behavior. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freund, K., Langevin, R., & Zajac, Y. (1974). Heterosexual aversion in homosexual males: A second experiment. British Journal of Psychiatry, 125, 177–180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., Dias, M., & McClelland, A. (1998). The role of body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, and breast size in judgments of female attractiveness. Sex Roles, 34, 311–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., Swami, V., & Shah, K. (2006). Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio and breast size correlates of ratings of attractiveness and health. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 443–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallup, G. G. (1982). Permanent breast enlargement in human females: A sociobiological analysis. Journal of Human Evolution, 11, 597–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S. W., & Buss, D. M. (1993). Pathogen prevalence and human mate preferences. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garn, S. M., & French, N. Y. (1963). Post-partum and age changes in areolar pigmentation. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 85, 873–875.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garn, S. M., Selby, S., & Crawford, M. R. (1956). Skin reflectance studies in children and adults. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 14, 101–117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garner, P., Smith, T., Baea, M., Lai, D., & Heywood, P. (1994). Maternal nutritional depletion in a rural area of Papua New Guinea. Tropical and Geographical Medicine, 46, 169–171.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodhart, C. B. (1964). A biological view of toplessness. New Scientist, 407, 558–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grammer, K., Fink, B., Juette, A., Ronzal, G., & Thornhill, R. (2001). Female faces and bodies: N-dimensional feature space and attractiveness. In G. Rhodes & I. Zebrowitz (Eds.), Advances in visual cognition I: Facial attractiveness (pp. 91–125). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grammer, K., Fink, B., Møller, A. P., & Thornhill, R. (2003). Darwinian aesthetics: Sexual selection and the biology of beauty. Biological Reviews, 78, 385–407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, R. D. (1976). Body hot spots. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, T. (1981). Physical attractiveness: The influence of selected torso parameters. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 10, 21–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jasienska, G. (2009). Reproduction and lifespan: Trade-offs, overall energy budgets, intergenerational costs, and costs neglected by research. American Journal of Human Biology, 21, 524–532.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jasienska, G., Ziomkiewicz, A., Ellison, P. T., Lipson, S. F., & Thune, I. (2004). Large breasts and narrow waists indicate high reproductive potential in women. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: B, 271, 1213–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jesser, C. J. (1971). Reflections on breast attention. Journal of Sex Research, 7, 13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenrick, D. T., & Keefe, R. C. (1992). Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 75–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeBlanc, S. A., & Barnes, E. (1974). Letter to the editor. The American Naturalist, 108, 577–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipson, S. F., & Ellison, P. T. (1996). Comparison of salivary steroid profiles in naturally occurring conception and non-conception cycles. Human Reproduction, 11, 2090–2096.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Low, B. S., Alexander, R. D., & Noonan, K. M. (1987). Human hips, breasts and buttocks: Is fat deceptive? Ethology and Sociobiology, 8, 249–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, J. T., Scutt, D., Whitehouse, G. H., & Leinster, S. J. (1997). Breast asymmetry and phenotypic quality in women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18, 223–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marlowe, F. (1998). The nubility hypothesis: The human breast as an honest signal of residual reproductive value. Human Nature, 9, 263–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mascia-Lees, F. E., Relethford, J. H., & Sorger, T. (1986). Evolutionary perspectives on permanent breast enlargement in human females. American Anthropologist, 88, 423–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller, A. P. (1999). Asymmetry as a predictor of growth, fecundity and survival. Ecology Letters, 2, 149–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller, A. P., Soler, M., & Thornhill, R. (1995). Breast asymmetry, sexual selection, and human reproductive success. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 207–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller, A. P., & Swaddle, J. P. (1997). Asymmetry, developmental stability and evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller, A. P., & Thornhill, R. (1998). Bilateral symmetry and sexual selection: A meta analysis. The American Naturalist, 151, 174–192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Montagna, W., & Macpherson, E. E. (1974). Some neglected aspects of the anatomy of the breasts. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 63, 10–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muzaffar, F., Hussain, I., & Haroon, T. S. (1998). Physiologic skin changes during pregnancy: A study of 140 cases. International Journal of Dermatology, 37, 429–431.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Niefert, M. R., Seacat, J. M., & Jobe, W. E. (1985). Lactation failure due to insufficient glandular development of the breast. Pediatrics, 76, 823–828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlowski, B. (1999). Permanent breasts as a side effect of subcutaneous fat tissue increase in human evolution. Homo, 50, 149–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlowski, B. (2001). The evolution of gluteal/femoral fat deposits and balance during pregnancy in bipedal Homo. Current Anthropology, 42, 572–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlowski, B., & Grabarczyk, M. (2003). Center of body mass and the evolution of female body shape. American Journal of Human Biology, 15, 144–150.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pawson, I. G., & Petrakis, N. L. (1975). Comparison of breast pigmentation among women of different racial groups. Human Biology, 47, 441–450.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pond, C. (1997). The biological origins of adipose tissue in humans. In M. E. Morbeck, A. Galloway, & A. L. Zihlman (Eds.), The evolving female: A life history perspective (pp. 147–162). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, G., & Simmons, L. W. (2007). Symmetry, attractiveness and sexual selection. In R. I. M. Dunbar & L. Barrett (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 333–364). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scutt, D., Lancaster, G. A., & Manning, J. T. (2006). Breast asymmetry and predisposition to breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research, 8. doi:10.1186/bcr1388.

  • Short, R. V. (1980). The origins of human sexuality. In C. R. Austin & R. V. Short (Eds.), Reproduction in mammals, Vol. 8. Human sexuality (pp. 1–33). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simblet, S. (2001). Anatomy for the artist. New York: DK Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D. (1995). Female health, attractiveness, and desirability for relationships: Role of breast asymmetry and waist-to-hip ratio. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 465–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D. (2002). Female mate choice at a glance: Relationship of waist-to-hip ratio to health, fecundity and attractiveness. Neuroendocrinology Letters, 23(suppl. 4), 81–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D., & Young, R. K. (1995). Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, breasts, and hips: Role in judgments of attractiveness and desirability for relationships. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 483–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. W. (1986). Psychology and evolution of breasts [Letter to the editor]. Journal of Human Evolution, 1, 285–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symons, D. (1995). Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder: The evolutionary psychology of human female sexual attractiveness. In P. R. Abramson & S. D. Pinkerton (Eds.), Sexual nature, sexual culture (pp. 80–118). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, J. M. (1962). Growth at adolescence (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R., & Grammer, K. (1999). The body and face of woman: One ornament that signals quality? Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 105–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tracer, D. P. (1991). Fertility-related changes in maternal body composition among the Au of Papua New Guinea. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 85, 393–406.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vandeweyer, E., & Hertens, D. (2002). Quantification of glands and fat in breast tissue: An experimental determination. Annals of Anatomy, 184, 181–184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, J. C. K. (2007). Sexual dimorphism of body composition. Best Practice and Research Endocrinology and Metabolism, 21, 415–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkvist, A., Rasmussen, K. M., & Habicht, J. P. (1992). A new definition of maternal depletion syndrome. American Journal of Public Health, 82, 691–694.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Editor and three anonymous reviewers for helpful and detailed comments that helped improve the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand

    Barnaby J. Dixson, Wayne L. Linklater & Alan F. Dixson

  2. Department of Psychology, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB, Canada

    Paul L. Vasey

  3. Department of Zoology, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia

    Katayo Sagata

  4. School of Mathematics, Statistics and Operations Research, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand

    Nokuthaba Sibanda

Authors
  1. Barnaby J. Dixson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paul L. Vasey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Katayo Sagata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nokuthaba Sibanda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wayne L. Linklater
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Alan F. Dixson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barnaby J. Dixson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dixson, B.J., Vasey, P.L., Sagata, K. et al. Men’s Preferences for Women’s Breast Morphology in New Zealand, Samoa, and Papua New Guinea. Arch Sex Behav 40, 1271–1279 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9680-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9680-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation