Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

What Sparks Ethical Decision Making? The Interplay Between Moral Intuition and Moral Reasoning: Lessons from the Scholastic Doctrine

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent theories on cognitive science have stressed the significance of moral intuition as a counter to and complementary part of moral reasoning in decision making. Thus, the aim of this paper is to create an integrated framework that can account for both intuitive and reflective cognitive processes, in order to explore the antecedents of ethical decision making. To do that, we build on Scholasticism, an important medieval school of thought from which descends the main pillars of the modern Catholic social doctrine. Particularly, the focus will be on the scholastic concept of synderesis, which is an innate human faculty that constantly inclines decision makers toward universal moral principles. Managerial implications are discussed, stressing how a rediscovery of decision makers’ intuitive moral judgments could be relevant in the reflective thinking practice of managers’ ethical reasoning, thus saving them from rational insensitivity to ethical dilemmas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agnihotri, R., Rapp, A., Kothandaraman, P., & Singh, R. K. (2012). An emotion-based model of salesperson ethical behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(2), 243–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas, T. (1947). Summa theologica (Fathers of the English Dominican Province, Trans.). New York: Benzinger Press.

  • Aquinas, T. (1972). Quaestiones disputatae de veritate, Sancti Thomae de Aquino Opera Omnia (Vol. 22). Rome: Editio Leonina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas, T. (2000). Scriptum super Libros Sententiarum (II). Bologna: Edizioni Studio Domenicano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (1998). Nicomachean ethics (W. D. Ross, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Arjoon, S. (2008). Reconciling situational social psychology with virtue ethics. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(3), 221–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arjoon, S. (2010). Aristotelian-Thomistic virtue ethics, emotional intelligence and decision-making. Advances in Management, 3(4), 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastons, M. (2008). The role of virtues in the framing of decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(3), 389–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benedict XVI. (2005). Deus Caritas Est. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.

  • Benedict XVI. (2007). On conscience. San Francisco: Ignatius Press.

  • Bonaventure, S. (1889). Commentaria in quatuor libros sententiarum Magistri Petri Lombardi, Tom 1. In P. P. Gollegii a S. Bonaventura (Eds.), Quaracchi: Typographia Collegii S. Bonaventurae.

  • Bonaventure, S. (1956). Itinerarium Mentis in Deum. In Philotheus Boehner, O. F. M (Ed.), Saint Bonaventure: The Franciscan Institute, Saint Bonaventure University.

  • Buchholz, R. A., & Rosenthal, S. B. (2005). The spirit of entrepreneurship and the qualities of moral decision making: Toward a unifying framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(3), 307–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., & Wadsworth, L. L. (2009). The impact of moral intensity dimensions on ethical decision-making: Assessing the relevance of orientation. Journal of Managerial Issues, 21(4), 534–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Celano, A. (2013). The foundation of moral reasoning: The development of the Doctrine of Universal Moral Principles in the works of Thomas Aquinas and his predecessors. Diametros, 38, 1–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craft, J. L. (2013). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 2004–2011. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(2), 221–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossan, M., Mazutis, D., & Seijts, G. (2013). In search of virtue: The role of virtues, values and character strengths in ethical decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(4), 567–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushman, F., Young, L., & Hauser, M. (2006). The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: Testing three principles of harm. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1082–1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dane, E., & Pratt, M. G. (2007). Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 33–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dane, E., & Sonenshein, S. (2014). On the role of experience in ethical decision making at work. An ethical expertise perspective. Organizational Psychology Review, 5(1), 74–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das Neves, J. C., & Melé, D. (2013). Managing ethically cultural diversity: Learning from Thomas Aquinas. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(4), 769–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierksmeier, C. (2013). Scholastic business ethics: Thomas Aquinas versus William of Ockham. In C. Luetge (Ed.), Handbook of the philosophical foundations of business ethics (pp. 159–178). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dierksmeier, C., & Celano, A. (2012). Thomas Aquinas on justice as a global virtue in business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(2), 247–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49(8), 709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. S. B. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O., & Gresham, L. G. (1985). A contingency framework for understanding ethical decision making in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 49, 87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, R. C., & Richardson, W. D. (1994). Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(3), 205–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forlivesi, M. (1993). Conoscenza e affettività: l’incontro con l’essere secondo Giovanni di San Tommaso (Vol. 8). Bologna: Edizioni Studio Domenicano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fridja, N. H. (1993). Moods, emotion episodes, and emotions. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 381–404). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaudine, A., & Thorne, L. (2001). Emotion and ethical decision-making in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 31(2), 175–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerson, J. (1958). De mystica theologia. In A. Combes (Ed.), Thesaurus Mundi, Lugano.

  • Gorevan, P. (2000). Aquinas and emotional theory today: Mind-body cognitivism and connaturality. Acta Philosophica, 9(1), 141–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105–2108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, R. A. (1991). Synderesis, the spark of conscience, in the English Renaissance. Journal of the History of Ideas, 52(2), 195–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, R. A. (1997). Instinct of nature: Natural law, synderesis, and the moral sense. Journal of the History of Ideas, 58(2), 173–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groves, K., Vance, C., & Paik, Y. (2008). Linking linear/nonlinear thinking style balance and managerial ethical decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(2), 305–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2003a). The emotional dog does learn new tricks: A reply to Pizarro and Bloom (2003). Psychological Review, 110, 197–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2003b). The moral emotions. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 852–870). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316, 998–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J., & Bjorklund, F. (2008). Social intuitionists answer six questions about morality. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology: The cognitive science of morality (Vol. 2, pp. 181–217). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2004). Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus, 133(4), 55–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson, G. P., Langan-Fox, J., & Sadler-Smith, E. (2008). Intuition: A fundamental bridging construct in the behavioural sciences. British Journal of Psychology, 99(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 6(1), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Javelet, R. (1961). Intelligence et amour chez les auteurs spirituels du XIIe siècle. Revue d’Ascétique et de Mystique, 37, 273–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgement. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 49–81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1785/1959). Foundations of the metaphysics of morals (L.W. Beck, Trans.). Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

  • Kant, I. (1790/1914). Critique of judgement (J. H. Bernard, Trans.). London: Macmillan.

  • Kärkkäinen, P. (2012). Synderesis in Late Medieval philosophy and the Wittenberg reformers. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 20(5), 881–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kihlstrom, J. F. (1987). The cognitive unconscious. Science, 237(4821), 1445–1452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kihlstrom, J. F., Mulvaney, S., Tobias, B. A., & Tobis, I. P. (2000). The emotional unconscious. In E. Eich, J. F. Kihlstrom, G. H. Bower, J. P. Forgas, & P. M. Niedenthal (Eds.), Cognition and emotion (pp. 30–86). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D., Fisher, D., & McCalman, D. (2009). Modernism, christianity, and business ethics: A worldview perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(1), 115–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. E., & Johnson, K. K. (2013). The impact of moral emotions on cause-related marketing campaigns: A cross-cultural examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(1), 79–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, P. (1999). Aquinas on the Passions. In S. MacDonald & E. Stump (Eds.), Aquinas’s moral theory (pp. 101–132). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehn, D. (1995). A role for virtue ethics in the analysis of business practice. Business Ethics Quarterly, 50(3), 533–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347–380). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard, C. M. (2013). Conscience. In J. J. Chambliss (Ed.), Philosophy of education: An encyclopedia (pp. 1–4). Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langston, D. (1993). The spark of conscience: Bonaventure’s view of conscience and synderesis. Franciscan Studies, 53(1), 79–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langston, D. (2011). Medieval theories of conscience. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.). The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Accessed June 13, 2015, from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/conscience-medieval/.

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1984). On the primacy of cognition. American Psychologist, 39(2), 124–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, P. V. (1989). Ethical principles for decision makers: A longitudinal survey. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(4), 271–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebert, E. (2008). The way of discernment: Spiritual practices for decision making. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombard, P. (2007). The sentences book 1: The mystery of the trinity (Giulio Silano, Trans.). Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies

  • Lottin O. (1942). Le rôle de la raison dans la morale Albertino-Thomiste. In Psychologie et morale aux XIIe et XIIIe siècles, Abbaye du Mont César, Duclot, Louvain, Gembloux

  • Lurie, Y. (2004). Humanizing business through emotions: On the role of emotions in ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 49(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luther, M. (1964). Dictata super Psalterium, 1513–1516. In D. Martin Luthers Werke (Ed.) (pp. 410–441) Kritische Gesamtausgabe, Graz

  • Marquardt, N., & Hoeger, R. (2009). The effect of implicit moral attitudes on managerial decision-making: An implicit social cognition approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(2), 157–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melé, D. (2005). Ethical education in accounting: Integrating rules, values and virtues. Journal of Business Ethics, 57(1), 97–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melé, D. (2010). Practical wisdom in managerial decision making. Journal of Management Development, 29(7), 637–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melé, D. (2016). Re-thinking capitalism: What we can learn from scholasticism? Journal of Business Ethics, 133, 293–304. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2368-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, J., & Mischel, W. (1999). A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower. Psychological Review, 106(1), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miesing, P., & Preble, J. F. (1985). A comparison of five business philosophies. Journal of Business Ethics, 4(6), 465–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morales-Sánchez, R., & Cabello-Medina, C. (2013). The role of four universal moral competencies in ethical decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(4), 717–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(4), 375–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ojakangas, M. (2013). The voice of conscience: A political genealogy of western ethical experience. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palazzo, G., Krings, F., & Hoffrage, U. (2013). Ethical blindness. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(3), 323–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini, M. M., & Ciappei, C. (2015). Ethical judgment and radical business changes: The role of entrepreneurial perspicacity. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(4), 769–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peyligk, J. (1499). Philosophie naturalis compendium. Leipzig: Melchior Lotter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philip the Chancellor. (1985). Philippi Cancellarii Parisiensis Summa de Bono. In N. Wicki (Ed.), Corpus Philosophorum Medii Aevi: Opera philosophica mediae aetatis selecta, II. Bern: Francke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poinsot, J. (1632/1985). Tractatus de Signis: The semiotic of John Poinsot. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Potts, T. C. (1980). Conscience in medieval philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Provis, C. (2015). Intuition, analysis and reflection in business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2688-z.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauch, A., & Frese, M. (2007). Born to be an entrepreneur? Revisiting the personality approach to entrepreneurship. In J. R. Baum, M. Frese, & R. A. Baron (Eds.), The psychology of entrepreneurship (pp. 41–65). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R., & Narváez, D. (1994). Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, M., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2005). Intuition myth or a decision-making tool? Management Learning, 36(3), 353–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, M. W., & Cullen, J. L. (1995). Socialization of business practitioners: Learning to reflect on current business practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(8), 695–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. J. (1998). Conscience and catholicism: The nature and function of conscience in contemporary roman catholic moral theology. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonenshein, S. (2007). The role of construction, intuition, and justification in responding to ethical issues at work: The sensemaking-intuition model. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1022–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. (2008). Distinguishing the reflective, algorithmic, and autonomous minds: Is it time for a tri-process theory? In J. Evans & K. Frankish (Eds.), In two minds: Dual processes and beyond (pp. 55–88). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Advancing the rationality debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(5), 701–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Smith-Crowe, K. (2008). Ethical decision making: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 545–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32(6), 951–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business, 59(4), 251–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verplaetse, J. (2009). Localizing the moral sense: Neuroscience and the search for the cerebral seat of morality, 1800–1930. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, G., & Hackett, R. D. (2015). Conceptualization and measurement of virtuous leadership: Doing well by doing good. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2560-1doi:.

  • Weaver, G. R., Reynolds, S. J., & Brown, M. E. (2014). Moral intuition connecting current knowledge to future organizational research and practice. Journal of Management, 40(1), 100–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker, B. G., & Godwin, L. N. (2013). The antecedents of moral imagination in the workplace: A social cognitive theory perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(1), 61–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woiceshyn, J. (2011). A model for ethical decision making in business: Reasoning, intuition, and rational moral principles. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(3), 311–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B. (1984). On the primacy of affect. American Psychologist, 39(2), 117–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong, C. B. (2011). The ethical dangers of deliberative decision making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sciences for Economics and Business, University of Florence, Via delle Pandette, 9, 50127, Florence, Italy

    Lamberto Zollo & Cristiano Ciappei

  2. Claude Littner Business School, University of West London, Boston Manor Road, Brentford, London, TW8 9GA, UK

    Massimiliano Matteo Pellegrini

Authors
  1. Lamberto Zollo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Massimiliano Matteo Pellegrini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cristiano Ciappei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lamberto Zollo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zollo, L., Pellegrini, M.M. & Ciappei, C. What Sparks Ethical Decision Making? The Interplay Between Moral Intuition and Moral Reasoning: Lessons from the Scholastic Doctrine. J Bus Ethics 145, 681–700 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3221-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3221-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation