Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Five Problems in Current Ethnobotanical Research—and Some Suggestions for Strengthening Them

  • Published:
Human Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Albuquerque, U. P. (2005). Introdução à Etnobotânica. Rio de Janeiro, Interciência.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albuquerque, U. P. (2006). Re-Examining Hypotheses Concerning the Use and Knowledge of Medicinal Plants: A Study in the Caatinga Vegetation of NE Brazil. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 2: 30. doi:10.1186/1746-4269-2-30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albuquerque, U. P. (2008). Etnobotânica aplicada para a conservação da biodiversidade. In Albuquerque, U. P., Lucena, R. F. P., and Cunha, L. F. V. (eds.), 2008. Métodos E Técnicas Na Pesquisa Etnobotânica. Comunigraf/NUPEEA, Recife.

  • Albuquerque, U. P. (2009). Quantitative Ethnobotany or Quantification in Ethnobotany? Ethnobotany Research & Applications 7: 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albuquerque, U. P., and Hanazaki, N. (2006). As Pesquisas Etnodirigidas Na Descoberta De Novos Fármacos De Interesse Médico E Farmacêutico: Fragilidades E Perspectivas. Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia 16: 678–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albuquerque, U. P., and Lucena, R. F. P. (2005). Can Apparency Affect the Use of Plants by Local People in Tropical Forests? Interciencia 30: 506–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albuquerque, U. P., and Oliveira, R. F. (2007). Is The Use-Impact on Native Caatinga Species in Brazil Reduced by the High Species Richness Of Medicinal Plants? Journal of Ethnopharmacology 113: 156–170. doi:10.1016/j.jep.2007.05.025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albuquerque, U. P., Lucena, R. F. P., Monteiro, J. M., Florentino, A. T. N., and Almeida, C. F. C. B. R. (2006). Evaluating Two Quantitative Ethnobotanical Techniques. Ethnobotany Research & Applications 4: 51–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albuquerque, U. P., Lucena, R. F. P., and L. F. V. Cunha (Eds.). 2008. Métodos e técnicas na pesquisa etnobotânica. Comunigraf/NUPEEA, Recife.

  • Alexiades, M. N. (1996). Selected Guidelines for Ethnobotanical Research: A Field Manual. New York Botanical Garden, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexiades, M. N. (2003). Ethnobotany in the Third Millennium: Expectations and Unresolved Issues. Delpinoa 45: 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, C. F. C. B. R., Silva, T. C. L., Amorim, E. L. C., Maia, M. B. S., and Albuquerque, U. P. (2005). Life Strategy and Chemical Composition as Predictors of the Selection of Medicinal Plants from the Caatinga (Northeast Brazil). Journal of Arid Environments 62: 127–142. doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2004.09.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begossi, A. (1996). Use of Ecological Methods in Ethnobotany: Diversity Indices. Economic Botany 50: 280–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belovsky, G. E., Botkin, D. B., Crowl, T. A., Cummins, K. W., Franklin, J. F., Hunter, M. L. Jr., Joern, A., Lindenmayer, D. B., MacMahon, J. A., Margules, C. R., and Scott, M. (2004). Ten Suggestions to Strengthen the Science of Ecology. BioScience 54(4): 345–350. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0345:TSTSTS]2.0.CO;2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, B., Breedlove, D. E., and Raven, P. H. (1966). Folk taxonomies and biological classification. Science 154(3746): 273–275. doi:10.1126/science.154.3746.273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, B., Breedlove, D. E., and Raven, P. H. (1968). Covert Categories and Folk Taxonomies. American Anthropologist 70(2): 290–299. doi:10.1525/aa.1968.70.2.02a00050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, B., Breedlove, D. E., and Raven, P. H. (1973). General Principles of Classification and Nomenclature in Folk Biology. American Anthropologist 75(1): 214–242. doi:10.1525/aa.1973.75.1.02a00140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, K. W., and Lau, Y. H. (2006). The Skill Acquisition Process Relative to Ethnobotanical Methods. Ethnobotany Research & Applications 4: 115–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broad, W. J. (1981). Fraud and the Structure of Science. Science 212(4491): 137–141. doi:10.1126/science.7209527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brook, R. K., and McLachlan, S. M. (2008). Trends and Prospects for Local Knowledge in Ecological and Conservation Research and Monitoring. Biodiversity and Conservation 17: 3501–3512. doi:10.1007/s10531-008-9445-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byg, A., and Balslev, H. (2001). Diversity and Use of Palms in Zahamena, Eastern Madagascar. Biodiversity and Conservation 10: 951–970. doi:10.1023/A:1016640713643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castañeda, H., and Stepp, J. R. (2007). Ethnoecological Importance Value (EIV) Methodology: Assessing the Cultural Importance of Ecosystems as Sources of Useful Plants for the Guaymi People of Costa Rica. Ethnobotany Research & Applications 5: 249–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clément, D. (1998). The Historical Foundations of Ethnobiology. Journal of Ethnobiology 18: 161–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, H. (1954). The Relation of the Hanunóo Culture to the Plant World. PhD. Dissertation. Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.

  • Cotton, C. M. (1996). Ethnobotany—Principles and Applications. Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunha, L. V. F., and Albuquerque, U. P. (2006). Quantitative Ethnobotany in an Atlantic Forest Fragment of Northeastern Brazil—Implications to Conservation. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 114: 1–25. doi:10.1007/s10661-006-1074-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, A. B. (2001). Applied Ethnobotany. Earthscan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellen, R. (2006). Ethnobiology and the Science of the Humankind. Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estomba, D., Ladio, A., and Lozada, M. (2006). Medicinal wild plant knowledge and gathering patterns in a Mapuche community from North-western Patagonia. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 103(1): 109–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, R. I. (1978). Ethnobotany: Historical diversity and synthesis. In Ford, R. I. (ed.), The Nature and Status of Ethnobotany. (Anthropological Papers 67, Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, pp. 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galeano, G. (2000). Forest Use at the Pacific Coast of Choco, Colombia: a quantitative approach. Economic Botany 54(3): 358–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garibay-Orijel, R., Caballero, J., Estrada-Torres, A., and Cifuentes, J. (2007). Understanding Cultural Significance, the Edible Mushrooms Case. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 3: 4. doi:10.1186/1746-4269-3-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geggie, D. (2001). A Survey of Newly Appointed Consultants: Attitudes Towards Research Fraud. Journal of Medical Ethics 27: 344–346. doi:10.1136/jme.27.5.344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanazaki, K. N., Tamashiro, J. Y., Leitão-Filho, H. F., and Begossi, A. (2000). Diversity of Plant Uses in Two Caiçaras Communities from the Atlantic Forest Coast, Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation 9: 597–615. doi:10.1023/A:1008920301824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, B., and Gallaher, G. (2007). Importance Indices in Ethnobotany. Ethnobotany Research & Applications 5: 201–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoft, M., Barik, S. K., and Lykke, A. M. (1999). Quantitative Ethnobotany—Applications of Multivariate and Statistical Analyses in Ethnobotany. People and Plants working paper 6. UNESCO, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns, T. (1996). The Origins of Human Diet and Medicine. The University of Arizona Press, Arizona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kida, T. (2006). Don’t Believe Everything You Think: The 6 Basic Mistakes We Make in Thinking. Prometheus Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintish, E. (2005). Scientific Misconduct: Researcher Faces Prison for Fraud in NIH Grant Applications and Papers. Science 307: 1851. doi:10.1126/science.307.5717.1851a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kormondy, E. J., and Brown, D. E. (1998). Fundamentals of Human Ecology. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber, A. L. (1920). Review of Uses of Plants by the Indians of the Missouri River region, by Melvin Randolph Gilmore. American Anthropologist 22: 384–385. doi:10.1525/aa.1920.22.4.02a00120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladio, A. H., and Lozada, M. (2004). Patterns of Use Knowledge of Wild Edible Plants in Distinct Ecological Environments: A Case Study of a Mapuche Community from Northwestern Patagonia. Biodiversity and Conservation 13: 1153–1173. doi:10.1023/B:BIOC.0000018150.79156.50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladio, A. H., Lozada, M., and Weigandt, M. (2007). Comparison of Traditional Wild Plant Knowledge Between Aboriginal Communities Inhabiting Arid and Forest Environments in Patagonia, Argentina. Journal of Arid Environments 69: 695–715. doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2006.11.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucena, R. F. P., Araújo, E. L., and Albuquerque, U. P. (2007). Does the Use-Value of Woody Plants of the Caatinga (Northeastern Brazil) Explain their Local Availability. Economic Botany 61: 347–361. doi:10.1663/0013-0001(2007)61[347:DTLAOW]2.0.CO;2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, E. (2000). Scientific Misconduct—How Prevalent Is Fraud? That’s a Million-Dollar Question. Science 290(5497): 1662–1663. doi:10.1126/science.290.5497.1662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, G. J. (1995). Ethnobotany. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • McArthur, R. H., and Wilson, E. O. (1967). The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClatchey, W. (2006). Improving Quality of International Ethnobotany Research and Publications. Ethnobotany Research & Applications 4: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moerman, D. E. (1991). The Medicinal Flora of Native North America: An Analysis. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 31: 1–42. doi:10.1016/0378-8741(91)90141-Y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moerman, D. E. (1996). An Analysis of the Food Plants and Drug Plants of Native North America. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 52: 1–22. doi:10.1016/0378-8741(96)01393-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moerman, D. E., Pemberton, R. W., Kiefer, D., and Berlin, B. (1999). A Comparative Analysis of Five Medicinal Floras. Journal of Ethnobiology 19: 46–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro, J. M., Lucena, R. F. P., Alencar, N. L., Nascimento, V. T., Araújo, T. A. S., and Albuquerque, U. P. (2008). When Intention Matters: Comparing Three Ethnobotanical Data Collection Strategies. In Albuquerque, U. P., and Ramos, M. A. (eds.), Current Topics in Ethnobotany. Research Signpost, Kerala, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazarea, V. (1999). Ethnoecology: situated knowledge/located lives. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neves, W. (2002). Antropologia Ecológica. Cortez, São Paulo.

    Google Scholar 

  • NSF Report (2003). Intelectual Imperatives in Ethnobiology. NSF Biocomplexity Report. Missouri Botanical Garden, Missouri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peroni, N. (2002). Coleta E Análise De Dados Quantitativos Em Etnobiologia: Introdução Ao Uso De Métodos Multivariados. Pp. 155–180. In. Métodos de Coleta e Análise de Dados em Etnobiologia, Etnoecologia e Disciplinas Correlatas. M.C.M. Amorozo, L.C. Ming, and S.M.P. Silva. (eds). Unesp/CNPq, Rio Claro.

  • Peroni, N., Begossi, A., and Kageyama, P. Y. (2007). Molecular Differentiation, Diversity, and Folk Classification of Sweet and Bitter Cassava in Caiçara and Caboclo Management Systems (Brazil). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 54: 1333–1349. doi:10.1007/s10722-006-9116-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, O. (1996). Some quantitative methods for analyzing ethnobotanical knowledge. In Alexiades, M. (ed.), Selected guidelines for ethnobotanical research: a field manual. The New York Botanical Garden, New York, pp. 171–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, O., and Gentry, A. H. (1993a). The Useful Plants of Tambopata, Peru: I. Statistical Hypotheses Tests with A New Quantitative Technique. Economic Botany 47: 15–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, O., and Gentry, A. H. (1993b). The Useful Plants of Tambopata, Peru: II. Statistical Hypotheses Tests with a New Quantitative Technique. Economic Botany 47: 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-Garcia, V., Vadez, V., Tanner, S., McDade, T., Huanca, T., and Leonard, W. (2006a). Evaluating Indices of Traditional Ecological Knowledge: A Methodological Contribution. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 2: 21. doi:10.1186/1746-4269-2-21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-Garcia, V., Vadez, V., Huanca, T., Leonard, W., and Wilkie, D. (2006b). Cultural, Practical, and Economic Value of Wild Plants: A Quantitative Study in the Bolivian Amazon. Economic Botany 60: 62–74. doi:10.1663/0013-0001(2006)60[62:CPAEVO]2.0.CO;2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-Garcia, V., Martí, N., McDade, T., Tanner, S., and Vadez, V. (2007). Concepts and Methods in Studies Measuring Individual Ethnobotanical Knowledge. Journal of Ethnobiology 27: 182–203. doi:10.2993/0278-0771(2007)27[182:CAMISM]2.0.CO;2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackeroff, J. M., and Campbell, L. M. (2007). Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Conservation Research: Problems and Prospects for their Constructive Engagement. Conservation and Society 5: 343–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, V. A., Andrade, L. H. C., and Albuquerque, U. P. (2006). Revisiting the Cultural Significance Index: The Case of the Fulni-ô in Northeastern Brazil. Field Methods 18: 98–108. doi:10.1177/1525822X05278025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tardío, J., and Pardo-de-Santayana, M. (2008). Cultural Importance Indices: A Comparative Analysis Based on the Useful Wild Plants of Southern Cantabria (Northern Spain). Economic Botany 62: 24–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toledo, V. M. (1995). New Paradigms for a new ethnobotany: Reflections on the case of Mexico. In Schultes, R. E., and Reis, S. V. (eds.), Ethnobotany: Evolution of a Discipline. Discorides, Portland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandebroek, I., Calewaert, J., de Jonckheere, S., Sanca, S., Semo, L., van Damme, P., Van Puyvelede, L., and de Kimpe, N. (2004). Use of Medicinal Plants and Pharmaceuticals by Indigenous Communities in the Bolivian Andes and Amazon. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 84: 243–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viertler, R. B. (1988). Ecologia Cultural: Uma Antropologia Da Mudança. São Paulo: Ática.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the CNPq for financial support (“Edital Universal”) and for grants awarded to U.P. Albuquerque, N. Hanazaki for fruitful discussions with her students at the Laboratory of Human Ecology and Ethnobotany (UFSC), and especially Dr. Daniel Moerman for valuable comments and criticisms.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Biologia, Area de Botânica. Laboratório de Etnobotânica Aplicada, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Dom Manoel de Medeiros s/n. Dois Irmãos, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil

    Ulysses Paulino de Albuquerque

  2. Centro de Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Ecologia e Zoologia, Laboratório de Ecologia Humana e Etnobotânica, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 88010-970, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil

    Natalia Hanazaki

Authors
  1. Ulysses Paulino de Albuquerque
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Natalia Hanazaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulysses Paulino de Albuquerque.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Albuquerque, U.P., Hanazaki, N. Five Problems in Current Ethnobotanical Research—and Some Suggestions for Strengthening Them. Hum Ecol 37, 653–661 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-009-9259-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-009-9259-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation