Skip to main content
Log in

Impaired Competence for Pretense in Children with Autism: Exploring Potential Cognitive Predictors

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lack of pretense in children with autism has been explained by a number of theoretical explanations, including impaired mentalising, impaired response inhibition, and weak central coherence. This study aimed to empirically test each of these theories. Children with autism (n = 60) were significantly impaired relative to controls (n = 65) when interpreting pretense, thereby supporting a competence deficit hypothesis. They also showed impaired mentalising and response inhibition, but superior local processing indicating weak central coherence. Regression analyses revealed that mentalising significantly and independently predicted pretense. The results are interpreted as supporting the impaired mentalising theory and evidence against competing theories invoking impaired response inhibition or a local processing bias. The results of this study have important implications for treatment and intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The term “metarepresentation” has been used to refer to different representational abilities. In referring to the ability to represent a representation, the term “secondary” representation (as used by Perner 1991) is used throughout this paper.

  2. Preliminary analyses indicated that performances within groups did not differ significantly between the self- and other-false belief tests therefore all between groups analyses were performed on a self- + other-false belief composite score.

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revised) (DSM-IV-TR). Washington, DC: APA.

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (1987). Autism and symbolic play. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5, 139–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (1989). The autistic child’s theory of mind: A case of specific developmental delay. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 30, 285–297.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S., Cox, A., Baird, G., Swettenham, J., Nightingale, N., Morgan, K., et al. (1996). Psychological markers of autism at 18 months of age in a large population. British Journal of Psychiatry, 168, 158–163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bigham, S. (2008). Comprehension of pretence in children with autism. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 26, 265–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigham, S., & Bourchier-Sutton, A. (2007). The decontextualization of form and function in the development of pretence. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 25, 335–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boucher, J. (2009). The autistic spectrum: Characteristics, causes and practical issues. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M., Whetton, C., & Pintilie, D. (1982). British picture vocabulary scale. Windsor: NFER-NELSON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, U. (1989). Autism: Explaining the enigma. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, U. (2003). Autism: Explaining the enigma (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haight, W., & Miller, P. J. (1992). The development of everyday pretend play: A longitudinal study of mothers’ participation. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 38(3), 331–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Happé, F., & Booth, R. (2008). The power of the positive: Revisiting weak coherence in autism spectrum disorders. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(1), 50–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Happé, F., & Frith, U. (2006). The weak coherence account: Detail-focused cognitive style in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(1), 5–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. L. (1993). Pretending and planning. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & D. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding other minds: Perspectives from autism (pp. 228–246). Oxford: Oxford university press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, C. (1996). Control of action and thought: Normal development and dysfunction in autism: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37(2), 229–236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jarrold, C. (2003). A review of research into pretend play in autism. Autism, 7(4), 379–390.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jarrold, C., Boucher, J., & Smith, P. K. (1994a). Executive function deficits and the pretend play of children with autism: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35(8), 1473–1482.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jarrold, C., Butler, D. W., Cottington, E. M., & Jimenez, F. (2000). Linking theory of mind and central coherence bias in autism and in the general population. Developmental Psychology, 36(1), 126–138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jarrold, C., Smith, P. K., Boucher, J., & Harris, P. L. (1994b). Comprehension of pretense in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24, 433–455.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kavanaugh, R. D., & Harris, P. L. (1994). Imagining the outcome of pretend transformations: Assessing the competence of normal children and children with autism. Developmental Psychology, 30(6), 847–854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, A. M. (1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of “Theory of Mind”. Psychological Review, 94(4), 412–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, A. M., & Polizzi, P. (1998). Inhibitory processing in the false belief task: Two conjectures. Developmental Science, 1(2), 247–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, A. M., & Roth, D. (1993). What autism teaches us about metarepresentation. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding other minds (pp. 83–111). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, V., & Boucher, J. (1988). Spontaneous, instructed and elicited play in relatively able autistic children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6, 325–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lillard, A. S. (2002). Pretend play and cognitive development. In U. Goswami (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive development (pp. 188–205). London: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G., & Chapman, J. (2001). Misunderstanding analysis of covariance. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110(1), 40–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, B., Maybery, M., & Durkin, K. (2003). Weak central coherence, poor joint attention, and low verbal ability: Independent deficits in early autism. Developmental Psychology, 39(4), 646–656.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mottron, L., Burack, J., Stauder, J., & Robaey, P. (1999). Perceptual processing among high-functioning persons with autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40(2), 203–211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perner, J. (1991). Understanding the representational mind. MIT Press

  • Perner, J., Frith, U., Leslie, A. M., & Leekham, S. R. (1989). Exploration of the autistic child’s theory of mind: Knowledge, belief, and communication. Child Development, 60, 689–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricks, D. M., & Wing, L. (1975). Language, communication, and the use of symbols in normal and autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 5, 191–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochat, P., & Striano, T. (1999). Social-cognitive development in the first year. In P. Rochat (Ed.), Early social cognition: Understanding others in the first months of life. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, M. D., Young, G. S., Hepburn, S., & Rogers, S. J. (2007). A longitudinal study of pretend play in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 1024–1039.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suddendorf, T., Fletcher-Flinn, C., & Johnston, L. (1999). Pantomime and theory of mind. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 160(1), 31–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). London: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M., & Carlson, S. M. (1997). The relation between individual differences in fantasy and theory of mind. Child Development, 68(3), 436–455.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103–128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Witkin, H. A., Oltman, P. K., Raskin, E., & Karp, S. A. (1971). A manual for the embedded figures test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by an Economic and Social Research Council studentship awarded to Sally Bigham at Brunel University. This support is gratefully acknowledged. The author would also like to thank staff and students at the schools that took part in this research. Sincerest gratitude is expressed to Prof. Jill Boucher who advised and assisted on preparation of the manuscript. Finally, the feedback of two anonymous reviewers has also been gratefully received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sally Bigham.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bigham, S. Impaired Competence for Pretense in Children with Autism: Exploring Potential Cognitive Predictors. J Autism Dev Disord 40, 30–38 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0820-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0820-6

Keywords

Navigation