Abstract
Lack of pretense in children with autism has been explained by a number of theoretical explanations, including impaired mentalising, impaired response inhibition, and weak central coherence. This study aimed to empirically test each of these theories. Children with autism (n = 60) were significantly impaired relative to controls (n = 65) when interpreting pretense, thereby supporting a competence deficit hypothesis. They also showed impaired mentalising and response inhibition, but superior local processing indicating weak central coherence. Regression analyses revealed that mentalising significantly and independently predicted pretense. The results are interpreted as supporting the impaired mentalising theory and evidence against competing theories invoking impaired response inhibition or a local processing bias. The results of this study have important implications for treatment and intervention.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The term “metarepresentation” has been used to refer to different representational abilities. In referring to the ability to represent a representation, the term “secondary” representation (as used by Perner 1991) is used throughout this paper.
Preliminary analyses indicated that performances within groups did not differ significantly between the self- and other-false belief tests therefore all between groups analyses were performed on a self- + other-false belief composite score.
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revised) (DSM-IV-TR). Washington, DC: APA.
Baron-Cohen, S. (1987). Autism and symbolic play. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5, 139–148.
Baron-Cohen, S. (1989). The autistic child’s theory of mind: A case of specific developmental delay. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 30, 285–297.
Baron-Cohen, S., Cox, A., Baird, G., Swettenham, J., Nightingale, N., Morgan, K., et al. (1996). Psychological markers of autism at 18 months of age in a large population. British Journal of Psychiatry, 168, 158–163.
Bigham, S. (2008). Comprehension of pretence in children with autism. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 26, 265–280.
Bigham, S., & Bourchier-Sutton, A. (2007). The decontextualization of form and function in the development of pretence. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 25, 335–351.
Boucher, J. (2009). The autistic spectrum: Characteristics, causes and practical issues. London: Sage.
Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M., Whetton, C., & Pintilie, D. (1982). British picture vocabulary scale. Windsor: NFER-NELSON.
Frith, U. (1989). Autism: Explaining the enigma. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
Frith, U. (2003). Autism: Explaining the enigma (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
Haight, W., & Miller, P. J. (1992). The development of everyday pretend play: A longitudinal study of mothers’ participation. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 38(3), 331–349.
Happé, F., & Booth, R. (2008). The power of the positive: Revisiting weak coherence in autism spectrum disorders. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(1), 50–63.
Happé, F., & Frith, U. (2006). The weak coherence account: Detail-focused cognitive style in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(1), 5–25.
Harris, P. L. (1993). Pretending and planning. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & D. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding other minds: Perspectives from autism (pp. 228–246). Oxford: Oxford university press.
Hughes, C. (1996). Control of action and thought: Normal development and dysfunction in autism: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37(2), 229–236.
Jarrold, C. (2003). A review of research into pretend play in autism. Autism, 7(4), 379–390.
Jarrold, C., Boucher, J., & Smith, P. K. (1994a). Executive function deficits and the pretend play of children with autism: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35(8), 1473–1482.
Jarrold, C., Butler, D. W., Cottington, E. M., & Jimenez, F. (2000). Linking theory of mind and central coherence bias in autism and in the general population. Developmental Psychology, 36(1), 126–138.
Jarrold, C., Smith, P. K., Boucher, J., & Harris, P. L. (1994b). Comprehension of pretense in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24, 433–455.
Kavanaugh, R. D., & Harris, P. L. (1994). Imagining the outcome of pretend transformations: Assessing the competence of normal children and children with autism. Developmental Psychology, 30(6), 847–854.
Leslie, A. M. (1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of “Theory of Mind”. Psychological Review, 94(4), 412–426.
Leslie, A. M., & Polizzi, P. (1998). Inhibitory processing in the false belief task: Two conjectures. Developmental Science, 1(2), 247–253.
Leslie, A. M., & Roth, D. (1993). What autism teaches us about metarepresentation. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding other minds (pp. 83–111). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Lewis, V., & Boucher, J. (1988). Spontaneous, instructed and elicited play in relatively able autistic children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6, 325–339.
Lillard, A. S. (2002). Pretend play and cognitive development. In U. Goswami (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive development (pp. 188–205). London: Blackwell.
Miller, G., & Chapman, J. (2001). Misunderstanding analysis of covariance. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110(1), 40–48.
Morgan, B., Maybery, M., & Durkin, K. (2003). Weak central coherence, poor joint attention, and low verbal ability: Independent deficits in early autism. Developmental Psychology, 39(4), 646–656.
Mottron, L., Burack, J., Stauder, J., & Robaey, P. (1999). Perceptual processing among high-functioning persons with autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40(2), 203–211.
Perner, J. (1991). Understanding the representational mind. MIT Press
Perner, J., Frith, U., Leslie, A. M., & Leekham, S. R. (1989). Exploration of the autistic child’s theory of mind: Knowledge, belief, and communication. Child Development, 60, 689–700.
Ricks, D. M., & Wing, L. (1975). Language, communication, and the use of symbols in normal and autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 5, 191–221.
Rochat, P., & Striano, T. (1999). Social-cognitive development in the first year. In P. Rochat (Ed.), Early social cognition: Understanding others in the first months of life. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rutherford, M. D., Young, G. S., Hepburn, S., & Rogers, S. J. (2007). A longitudinal study of pretend play in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 1024–1039.
Suddendorf, T., Fletcher-Flinn, C., & Johnston, L. (1999). Pantomime and theory of mind. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 160(1), 31–45.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). London: Allyn and Bacon.
Taylor, M., & Carlson, S. M. (1997). The relation between individual differences in fantasy and theory of mind. Child Development, 68(3), 436–455.
Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103–128.
Witkin, H. A., Oltman, P. K., Raskin, E., & Karp, S. A. (1971). A manual for the embedded figures test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by an Economic and Social Research Council studentship awarded to Sally Bigham at Brunel University. This support is gratefully acknowledged. The author would also like to thank staff and students at the schools that took part in this research. Sincerest gratitude is expressed to Prof. Jill Boucher who advised and assisted on preparation of the manuscript. Finally, the feedback of two anonymous reviewers has also been gratefully received.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bigham, S. Impaired Competence for Pretense in Children with Autism: Exploring Potential Cognitive Predictors. J Autism Dev Disord 40, 30–38 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0820-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0820-6