Skip to main content
Log in

Adherence to Wraparound Principles and Association with Outcomes

  • Published:
Journal of Child and Family Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Maintaining fidelity to the principles of the Wraparound process in serving children with emotional and behavioral disorders is a high priority. However, the assumption that greater adherence to the model will yield superior outcomes has not been tested. The current study investigated associations between adherence to Wraparound principles, as assessed by the Wraparound Fidelity Index, second version (WFI), and child and family outcomes in one federally funded system-of-care site. Results demonstrated that higher fidelity was associated with better behavioral, functioning, restrictiveness of living, and satisfaction outcomes. No associations were found for several additional outcomes making interpretation difficult. Our study provides initial support for the hypothesis that maintaining fidelity to the philosophical principles of Wraparound is important to achieving outcomes. The study also provides support for the construct validity of the WFI as a service process measure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bickman, L., Noser, K., & Summerfelt, W. T. (1999). Long-term effects of a system of care on children and adolescents. Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research, 26, 185–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, G. R., Evans, L., Salyers, M., Williams, J., & Hea-Won, K. (2001). Measurement of fidelity in psychiatric rehabilitation. Mental Health Services Research, 2, 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, E. J., Burchard, J. D., Suter, J. C., & Force, M. M. (2005). Measuring fidelity within community treatments for children and families: Challenges and strategies. In M. H. Epstein, A. Duchnowski, & K. Kutash (Eds.), Outcomes for children and youth with emotional and behavioral disorders and their families (pp. 175–197). Austin, TX: Pro–ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, E. J., Burchard, J. D., Suter, J. C., Force, M. M., & Dakan, E. (2003). Fidelity to the Wraparound process and its association with outcomes. In C. Newman, C. J. Liberton, K. Kutash, & R. M. Friedman (Eds.), The 15th Annual Research Conference Proceedings, A System of Care for Children's Mental Health: Expanding the Research Base (pp. 419–424). Tampa: University of South Florida, The Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, Research and Training Center for Children's Mental Health.

  • Bruns, E. J., Burchard, J. D., Suter, J. C., Leverentz-Brady, K., & Force, M. M. (2004). Assessing fidelity to a community-based treatment for youth: The Wraparound Fidelity Index. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 12, 79–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, E. J., Ermold, J., & Burchard, J. D. (2001). The Wraparound Fidelity Index: Results from an initial pilot test. In C. Newman, C. J. Liberton, K. Kutash, & R. M. Friedman (Eds.), The 13th Annual Research Conference Proceedings, A System of Care for Children's Mental Health: Expanding the Research Base (pp. 339–342). Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Research and Training Center for Children's Mental Health.

  • Burchard, J. D., Bruns, E. J., & Burchard, S. N. (2002). The Wraparound approach. In B. J. Burns & K. Hoagwood (Eds.), Community treatment for youth: Evidenced-based intereventions for severe emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 69–90). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchard, J. D., Burchard, S. N., Sewell, R., & VanDenBerg, J. (1993). One kid at a time: Evaluative case studies and descriptions of the Alaska Youth Initiative Demonstration Project. Washington, DC: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Service Administration, Center for Mental Health Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, B. J., & Goldman, S. K. (Eds.). (1999). Promising practices in Wraparound for children with serious emotional disturbance and their families (Vol. IV). Washington, DC: Center for Effective Collaboration and Practice, American Institutes for Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, B. J., Hoagwood, K., & Maulsby, L. T. (1998). Improving outcomes for children and adolescents with serious emotional and behavioral disorders: Current and future directions. In M. H. Epstein, K. Kutash, & A. Duchnowski (Eds.), Outcomes for children and youth with behavioral and emotional disorders and their families: programs and evaluation best practices (pp. 685–707). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, B. J., Hoagwood, K., & Mrazek, P. J. (1999). Effective treatment for mental disorders in children and adolescents. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 2, 199–254.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dane, A. V., & Schneider, B. H. (1998). Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: Are implementation effects out of control? Clinical Psychology Review, 18, 23–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drake, R. E., Goldman, H. H., Leff, H. S., Lehman, A. F., Dixon, L., Mueser, K., Torrey, W. C. (2001). Implementing evidence-based practices in routine mental health settings. Psychiatric Services, 52, 179–182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eber, L. (2003). The art and science of Wraparound manual. Bloomington, IN: Forum on Education at Indiana University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, M. H., Jayanthi, M., McKelvey, J., Frankenberry, E., Hardy, R., Dennis, K., & Dennis, K. (1998). Reliability of the Wraparound Observation Form: An instrument to measure the wraparound process. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 7, 161–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, M. H., & Sharma, J. M. (1998). Behavioral and emotional rating scale: A strength-based approach to assessment. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, E. M. Z., Burns, B. J., Dubs, M. S., & Thompson, S. (2002). Assessing conformity to standards for treatment foster care. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 10, 213–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, M. T., Domitrovitch, C. E., Graczyk, P., & Sims, A. (2001). A conceptual model of implementation for school-based preventive interventions: Implications for research, practice, and policy. Washington, DC: SAMHSA Center for Mental Health Services.

  • Goldman, S. K. (1999). The conceptual framework for wraparound: Definition, values, essential elements, and requirements for practice. In B. J. Burns & C. K. Goldman (Eds.), Systems of care: Promising practices in children's mental health, 1998 series (Vol. 4, pp. 9–16). Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grealish, E. M. (2000). The wraparound process curriculum. McMurray, PA: Community Partners, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, M. T., Domitrovich, C. E., Graczyk, P., & Zins, J. (2001). A conceptual model of implementation for school-based preventive interventions: Implications for research, practice, and policy. State College, PA: Prevention Research Center for the Promotion of Human Development, College of Health and Human Development, Pennsylvania State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, M., Noble, K., Schick, C., & Noble, M. (2005). The relationship between fidelity to wraparound and behavior outcomes. In C. Newman, C. J. Liberton, K. Kutash, & R. M. Friedman (Eds.), The 16th Annual Research Conference Proceedings, A System of Care for Children's Mental Health: Expanding the Research Base (pp. 293–296). Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Research and Training Center for Children's Mental Health.

  • Hawkins, R. P., Almeida, M. C., Fabry, B., & Reitz, A. L. (1992). A scale to measure the restrictiveness of living environments for troubled children and youths. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 43, 54–58.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henggeler, S. W., Schoenwald, S. K., Liao, J. G., Letourneau, E. J., & Edwards, D. L. (2002). Transporting efficacious treatments to field settings: The link between supervisory practices and therapist fidelity in MST programs. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 31, 155–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoagwood, K., Schoenwald, S., Kiser, L., Ringeisen, H., & Burns, B. (2001). Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health services. Psychiatric Services, 52, 1179–1189.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, K. (1999). Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS). In M. E. Maruish (Ed.), Use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcome assessment (2nd ed.) (pp. 321–364). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendziora, K., Bruns, E., Osher, D., Pacchiano, D., & Mejia, B. (2001). Wraparound: Stories from the field, Systems of care: Promising practices in children's mental health, 2001 Series, Volume 1. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.

  • Manteuffel, B., Stephens, R. L., & Santiago, R. (2002). Overview of the comprehensive community mental health services for children and their families program and summary of current findings. Children's Services: Public Policy, Research, and Practice, 5, 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHugo, G. J., Drake, R. E., Teague, G. B., & Xie, H. (1999). The relationship between model fidelity and client outcomes in the New Hampshire Dual Disorders Study. Psychiatric Services, 50, 818–824.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moncher, F. J., & Prinz, R. J. (1991). Treatment fidelity in outcome studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 11, 247–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ORCMacro. (2000). Annual report to congress: 2000. Atlanta, GA: Author.

  • Rosenblatt, A., & Woodbridge, M. (2003). Deconstructing research on systems of care for youth with EBD: Frameworks for policy research. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11, 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenwald, S. K., Henggeler, S. W., Brondino, M. J., & Rowland, M. D. (2000). Multisystemic Therapy: Monitoring treatment fidelity. Family Process, 39, 83–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • VanDenBerg, J., & Grealish, E. M. (1998). The wraparound process training manual. Pittsburgh, PA: The Community Partnerships Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. S., Koroloff, N., & Schutte, K. (2003). Implementing high-quality collaborative individualized service/support planning: Necessary conditions. Portland, OR: Research and Training Center on Family Support and Children's Mental Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisman, A., Tompson, M. C., Okazaki, S., Gregory, J., Goldstein, M. J., Rea, M., & Miklowitz, D. J. (2002). Clinicians' fidelity to a manual-based family treatment as a predictor of the one-year course of bipolar disorder. Family Process, 41, 123–131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weisz, J. R., Donenberg, G. R., Han, S. S., & Weiss, B. (1995). Bridging the gap between laboratory and clinic in child and adolescent psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 688–701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric J. Bruns.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bruns, E.J., Suter, J.C., Force, M.M. et al. Adherence to Wraparound Principles and Association with Outcomes. J Child Fam Stud 14, 521–534 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-005-7186-y

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-005-7186-y

Key Words

Navigation