Skip to main content
Log in

Axillary vein puncture using fluoroscopic landmarks: a safe and effective approach for implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Axillary vein puncture is an effective method for pacemaker lead insertion with less complications compared with subclavian vein puncture; however, there are limited data on implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation with this technique. We reported our experience with a blind axillary vein puncture using fluoroscopic landmarks consisting of the outer edge of the first rib and the body surface of the second rib for ICD lead implantation.

Methods

The study population included 103 consecutive patients (mean age 59 ± 9 years) referred for ICD implantation using axillary vein puncture without contrast venography. An 18-gauge needle was advanced toward the outer edge of the fist rib below the clavicle or the body surface of the second rib. If the vein was not entered, the needle was withdrawn and the puncture was repeated with slight variations of needle direction for a maximum of four times, then contrast-guided vein puncture was performed.

Results

The total implanted leads were 152 including 103 right ventricular leads, 35 right atrial leads, and 14 left ventricular epicardial leads. Blind axillary vein puncture was successful obtained in 96 (93.2 %) patients. The rate of success was higher using the body surface of the second rib compared with the outer edge of the first rib (88.7 vs. 100 %; p = 0.04).Contrast venography was required in seven (6.8 %) patients because of vein course abnormality (n = 5) or vasospasm (n = 2). No acute complications or device-related complications were recorded during a mean follow-up of 12 ± 5 months.

Conclusions

Axillary vein access using fluoroscopic landmarks, especially the body surface of the second rib, is an effective approach for ICD implantation and offers the potential to avoid complications usually observed with traditional subclavian vein approach

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Littleford, P. O., Parsonnet, V., & Spector, S. D. (1979). Method for the rapid and atraumatic insertion of permanent endocardial pacemaker electrodes through the subclavian vein. American Journal of Cardiology, 43, 980–982.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aggarwal, R. K., Connelly, D. T., Ray, S. G., Ball, J., & Charles, R. G. (1995). Early complications of permanent pacemaker implantation. British Heart Journal, 73, 571–575.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chauhan, A., Grace, A. A., & Newell, S. A. (1994). Early complications after dual chamber versus single chamber pacemaker implantation. PACE, 17(Pt. II), 2012–2013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kazama, S., Nishiyama, K., & Machii, M. (1993). Long term follow up of ventricular endocardial pacing leads. Japanese Heart Journal, 34, 193–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Alt, E., Volker, R., & Blomer, H. (1987). Lead fracture in pacemaker patients. Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon, 35, 101–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Antonelli, D., Rosenfeld, T., Freedberg, N. A., Palma, E., Gross, J. N., & Furman, S. (1998). Insulation lead failure: is it a matter of insulation coating, venous approach, or both? Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 21, 418–421.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Magney, J. E., Flynn, D. M., Parsons, J. A., Staplin, D. H., Chin-Purcell, M. V., Milstein, S., & Hunter, D. W. (1993). Anatomical mechanisms explaining damage to pacemaker leads, defibrillator leads, and failure of central venous catheters adjacent to the sternoclavicular joint. PACE, 16, 445.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Femenia, F., Diez, J. C., Arce, M., & Baranchuk, A. (2011). Subclavian crush syndrome: a cause of pacemaker lead fracture. Cardiovascular Journal of Africa, 22, 201–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Roelke, M., O’Nunain, S. S., & Osswald, S. (1995). Subclavian crush syndrome complicating transvenous cardioverter defibrillator systems. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 18, 973–979.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Migliore F, Curnis A, Bertaglia E. Axillary vein technique for pacemaker and implantable defibrillator leads implantation: a safe and alternative approach? J Cardiovasc Med 2014; [Epub ahead of print].

  11. Sharma, G., Senguttuvan, N. B., Thachil, A., Leong, D., Naik, N., Yadav, R., & Juneja, R. (2012). A comparison of lead placement through the subclavian vein technique with fluoroscopy-guided axillary vein technique for permanent pacemaker insertion. Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 28, 542–546.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Silvetti, M. S., Placidi, S., Palmieri, R., Righi, D., Rava, L., & Drago, F. (2013). Percutaneous axillary vein approach in pediatric pacing: comparison with subclavian vein approach. Pacing Clini Electrophysiol, 36, 1550–1557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yamada, T., Ando, K., Goya, M., Yasumoto, H., & Nobuyoshi, M. (2006). Long term lead survival after two types of vein puncture [abstract]. Heart Rhythm, 3, 141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ki Hun, K., Kee-Joon, C., & Kyyoung-Min, P. (2013). Long term efficacy of axillary vein approach compared with subclavian vein approach for permanent pacemaker implantation [abstract]. American College of Cardiology, 61.

  15. Byrd, C. (1993). Clinical experience with the extrathoracic introducer insertion technique. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 16, 1781–1784.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gardini, A., & Benedini, G. (1998). Blind extrathoracic subclavian venipuncture for pacemaker implant: a 3-year experience in 250 patients. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 21, 2304–2308.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Magney, J., Staplin, D., Flynn, D., & Hunter, D. (1993). A new approach to percutaneous subclavian venipuncture to avoid lead fracture or central venous catheter occlusion. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 16, 2133–2142.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Burri, H., Sunthorn, H., Dorsaz, P., & Shah, D. (2005). Prospective study of axillary vein puncture with or without contrast venography for pacemaker and defibrillator lead implantation. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 28(Suppl 1), S280–S283.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Calkins, H., Ramza, B. M., Brinker, J., Atiga, W., Donahue, K., Nsah, E., & Taylor, E. (2001). Prospective randomized comparison of the safety and effectiveness of placement of endocardial pacemaker and defibrillator leads using the extrathoracic subclavian vein guided by contrast venography versus the cephalic approach. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 24, 456–464.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rodorf, R., Poggio, L., Savastano, S., Vicentini, A., Petracci, B., Chieffo, E., & Klersy, C. (2013). Failure of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads: a matter of lead size? Heart Rhythm, 10, 184–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dora, S., Kumar, V., Bhat, A., & Tharakan, J. (2003). Venogram-guided extrathoracic subclavian vein puncture. Indian Heart Journal, 55, 637–640.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nash, A., Burrell, C., Ring, N., & Marshall, A. (1998). Evaluation of an ultrasonically guided vein puncture technique for the placement of permanent pacing electrodes. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 21, 452–455.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Belott, P. (2006). How to access the axillary vein. Heart Rhythm, 3, 366–369.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Antonelli, D., Feldman, A., Freedberg, N. A., & Turgeman, Y. (2013). Axillary vein puncture without contrast venography for pacemaker and defibrillator leads implantation. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 36, 1107–1110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jiang, M., Gong, X., Zhou, S., Pu, J., Mao, J., & He, B. (2013). A comparison of steep and shallow needle trajectories in blind axillary vein puncture. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 36, 1150–1155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ramza, B. M., Rosenthal, L., Hui, R., Nsah, E., Savader, S., Lawrence, J. H., Tomaselli, G., et al. (1997). Safety and effectiveness of placement of pacemaker and defibrillator leads in the axillary vein guided by contrast venography. American Journal of Cardiology, 80, 892–896.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Krahn, A. D., Morissette, J., Lahm, R., Haddad, T., Baxter, W. W., McVenes, R., Crystal, E., et al. (2014). Radiographic predictors of lead conductor fracture. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol, 7, 1070–1077.

  28. Kim, K. H., Park, K. M., Nam, G. B., Kim, D. K., Oh, M., & Choi, H. (2014). Comparison of the axillary venous approach and subclavian venous approach for efficacy of permanent implantation. 8-year follow-up results. Circulation Journal, 78, 865–871.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Federico Migliore.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Migliore, F., Siciliano, M., De Lazzari, M. et al. Axillary vein puncture using fluoroscopic landmarks: a safe and effective approach for implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 43, 263–267 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-015-0011-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-015-0011-7

Keywords

Navigation