Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Factor Analysis of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in a Heterogeneous Clinical Sample

  • Published:
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study assesses the facet structure and psychometric properties of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) with a heterogeneous clinical sample of individuals with mood and anxiety disorders. Various factor models of the FFMQ were submitted to confirmatory factor analyses (CFA). A four factor hierarchical solution, consisting of an overall mindfulness construct subsuming at least four factors, was adopted. Both internal consistency and convergent and discriminant validity were assessed. Along with demonstrating good internal consistency, the facets of the FFMQ were appropriately associated with other psychological constructs. Many mindfulness facets exhibited inverse relationships with emotion dysregulation, emotional avoidance, and psychological distress. The observe facet appeared to assume a role antagonistic to overall mindfulness within a clinical sample, as it exhibited a positive relationship with anxious arousal and no relationship with two other mindfulness facets. Findings support the notion of mindfulness as a multifaceted construct, the structure of which alters in the context of psychopathology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., & Allen, K. B. (2004). Assessment of Mindfulness by Self-Report the Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills. Assessment, 11(3), 191–206. doi:10.1177/1073191104268029.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using Self-Report Assessment Methods to Explore Facets of Mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27–45. doi:10.1177/1073191105283504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Lykins, E., Button, D., Krietemeyer, J., Sauer, S., & Williams, J. M. G. (2008). Construct Validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Meditating and Nonmeditating Samples. Assessment, 15(3), 329–342. doi:10.1177/1073191107313003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, P. (2007). Structural Equation Modelling: Adjudging Model Fit. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 815–824. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohlmeijer, E., Peter, M., Fledderus, M., Veehof, M., & Baer, R. (2011). Psychometric Properties of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Depressed Adults and Development of a Short Form. Assessment, 18(3), 308–320. doi:10.1177/1073191111408231.

  • Bond, F. W., Hayes, S. C., Baer, R. A., Carpenter, K. M., Guenole, N., Orcutt, H. K., & Zettle, R. D. (2011). Preliminary Psychometric Properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire–II: A Revised Measure of Psychological Inflexibility and Experiential Avoidance. Behavior Therapy, 42((4), 676–688. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. The Guilford Press.

  • Brown, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit. Testing structural equation models, 154, 136–162. doi:10.1177/0049124192021002 005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The Benefits of Being Present: Mindfulness and its Role in Psychological Well-Being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.84.4.822.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. W., Ryan, R. M., & Creswell, J. D. (2007). Mindfulness: Theoretical Foundations and Evidence for its Salutary Effects. Psychological Inquiry, 18(4), 211–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, P., Hember, M., Mead, S., Lilley, B., & Dagnan, D. (2005). Responding mindfully to unpleasant thoughts and images: Reliability and validity of the Mindfulness Questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Christopher, M. S., Neuser, N. J., Michael, P. G., & Baitmangalkar, A. (2012). Exploring the Psychometric Properties of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire. Mindfulness, 3(2), 124–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, Criteria, and Rules of Thumb for Evaluating Normed and Standardized Assessment Instruments in Psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 284. doi:10.1037/1040–3590.6.4.284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Bruin, E. I., Topper, M., Muskens, J. G., Bögels, S. M., & Kamphuis, J. H. (2012). Psychometric Properties of the Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) in a Meditating and a Non-meditating Sample. Assessment, 19(2), 187–197. doi:10.1177/1073191112446654.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Desrosiers, A., Klemanski, D. H., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2013). Mapping Mindfulness Facets onto Dimensions of Anxiety and Depression. Behavior Therapy.

  • Di Nardo, P. A., O’Brien, G. T., Barlow, D. H., Waddell, M. T., & Blanchard, E. B. (1983). Reliability of DSM-III Anxiety Disorder Categories Using a New Structured Interview. Archives of General Psychiatry, 40(10), 1070.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, B. D., Stefanovitch, I., Evans, D., Oliver, C., Hawkins, A., & Dalgleish, T. (2010). Can you feel the Beat? Interoceptive Awareness is an Interactive Function of Anxiety-and Depression-Specific Symptom Dimensions. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48(11), 1133–1138. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2010.07.006.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers, A., & Breuer, P. (1996). How Good are Patients with Panic Disorder at Perceiving Their Heartbeats? Biological Psychology, 42(1), 165–182. doi:10.1016/0301–0511(95)05153–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, G. C., Hayes, A. M., Kumar, S. M., & Greeson, J. M. (2004). Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale. Unpublished manuscript.

  • First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. W. (2002). Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders, Research Version (Patientth ed.). New York: Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisak, B., & von Lehe, A. C. (2012). The Relation Between the Five Facets of Mindfulness and Worry in a Non-clinical Sample. Mindfulness, 3(1), 15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fresco, D. M., Flynn, J. J., Mennin, D. S. and Haigh, E. A. P. (2011) Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy, in Acceptance and Mindfulness in Cognitive Behavior Therapy: Understanding and Applying the New Therapies (eds J. D. Herbert and E. M. Forman), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA. doi: 10.1002/9781118001851.ch

  • Frisch, M. B., Cornell, J., Villanueva, M., & Retzlaff, P. J. (1992). Clinical validation of the Quality of Life Inventory. A measure of life satisfaction for use in treatment planning and outcome assessment. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 92–101.

  • Garland, E. L., Gaylord, S. A., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2011). Positive Reappraisal Mediates the Stress-Reductive Effects of Mindfulness: An Upward Spiral Process. Mindfulness, 2(1), 59–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional Assessment of Emotion Regulation and Dysregulation: Development, Factor Structure, and Initial Validation of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26(1), 41–54. doi:10.1023/B:JO BA.0000007455.08539.94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual Differences in Two Emotion Regulation Processes: Implications for Affect, Relationships, and Well-Being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348–362. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.85.2.348.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. J., & Levenson, R. W. (1993). Emotional Suppression: Physiology, Self-report, and Expressive Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 970–970. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.64.6.970.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P., Niemann, L., Schmidt, S., & Walach, H. (2004). Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction and Health Benefits-a Meta-Analysis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 57(1), 35–44. doi:10.1016/S0022–3999(03)00573–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. New York: The Guilford Press.

  • Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K., Wilson, K. G., Bissett, R. T., Pistorello, J., Toarmino, D., & McCurry, S. M. (2004). Measuring Experiential Avoidance: A Preliminary Test of a Working Model. The Psychological Record, 54(4), 553–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepburn, S. R., Crane, C., Barnhofer, T., Duggan, D. S., Fennell, M. J., & Williams, J. M. G. (2009). Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy may Reduce Thought Suppression in Previously Suicidal Participants: Findings from a Preliminary Study. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 48(2), 209–215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herbert, J. D., & Forman, E. M. (Eds.). (2011). Acceptance and mindfulness in cognitive behavior therapy: Understanding and applying the new therapies. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives Structural Equation Modeling. A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/1070 5519909540118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. L. (2003). Revisiting Sample Size and Number of Parameter Estimates: Some Support for the N: q Hypothesis. Structural Equation Modeling, 10(1), 128–141. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM1001_6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your mind and body to face stress, pain, and illness. New York: Delacorte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (1994). Wherever you go, there you are: mindfulness meditation in everyday life. New York: Hyperion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keselman, H. J., Cribbie, R., & Holland, B. (2002). Controlling the Rate of Type I Error Over a Large Set of Statistical Tests. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 55(1), 27–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press.

  • Larsen, R. J. (1984). Theory and Measurement of Affect Intensity as an Individual Difference Characteristic. Dissertation Abstracts International, 85, 2297B.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, R. J., & Diener, E. (1987). Affect Intensity as an Individual Difference Characteristic: a Review. Journal of Research in Personality, 21(1), 1–39. doi:10.1016/0092–6566(87)90023–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, R. J., Diener, E., & Emmons, R. A. (1986). Affect Intensity and Reactions to Daily Life Events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(4), 803–815. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.51.4.803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leahy, R. L. (2011) Emotional Schema Therapy: A Bridge Over Troubled Waters, in Acceptance and Mindfulness in Cognitive Behavior Therapy: Understanding and Applying the New Therapies (eds J. D. Herbert and E. M. Forman), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA. doi: 10.1002/9781118001851.ch5

  • Linehan, M. M., Comtois, K. A., Murray, A. M., Brown, M. Z., Gallop, R. J., Heard, H. L., & Lindenboim, N. (2006). Two-Year Randomized Controlled Trial and Follow-Up of Dialectical Behavior Therapy vs Therapy by Experts for Suicidal Behaviors and Borderline Personality Disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 63(7), 757. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.63.7.757.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to Parcel: Exploring the Question, Weighing the Merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 151–173. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, T. J., Miller, M. L., Metzger, R. L., & Borkovec, T. D. (1990). Development and Validation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 28(6), 487–495. doi:10.1016/0005–7967(90)90135–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, A. S., & Heimberg, R. G. (2013). Social Anxiety and Social Anxiety Disorder. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 249–274.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pike, N. (2011). Using False Discovery Rates for Multiple Comparisons in Ecology and Evolution. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2(3), 278–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powers, M. B., Zum Vörde Sive Vörding, M. B., & Emmelkamp, P. M. (2009). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: a Meta-Analytic Review. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 78(2), 73–80. doi:10.1159/000190790.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rapee, R. M., & Heimberg, R. G. (1997). A Cognitive-Behavioral Model of Anxiety in Social Phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35(8), 741–756.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robins, C. J. and Rosenthal, M. Z. (2011) Dialectical Behavior Therapy, in Acceptance and Mindfulness in Cognitive Behavior Therapy: Understanding and Applying the New Therapies (eds J. D. Herbert and E. M. Forman), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA. doi: 10.1002/9781118001851.ch7

  • Shapiro, S. L., Carlson, L. E., Astin, J. A., & Freedman, B. (2006). Mechanisms of Mindfulness. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(3), 373–386. doi:10.1002/jclp. 20237.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Teasdale, J. D., Segal, Z. V., Williams, J. M. G., Ridgeway, V. A., Soulsby, J. M., & Lau, M. A. (2000). Prevention of Relapse/Recurrence in Major Depression by Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(4), 615–623. doi:10.1037/0022–006X.68.4.615.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tran, U. S., Glück, T. M., & Nader, I. W. (2013). Investigating the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ): Construction of a Short Form and Evidence of a Two‐Factor Higher Order Structure of Mindfulness. Journal of Clinical Psychology.

  • Vøllestad, J., Nielsen, M. B., & Nielsen, G. H. (2012). Mindfulness‐and Acceptance‐Based Interventions for Anxiety Disorders: a Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51(3), 239–260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, D. (1989). The Role of Confirmatory Factor Analysis in Cross-Cultural Research. International Journal of Psychology, 24(1), 685–701. doi:10.1080/0 0207598908247839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1991). The Mood and Anxiety Symptom Questionnaire (MASQ). University of Iowa City: Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Weber, K., Smith Assenheimer, J., Clark, L. A., Strauss, M. E., & McCormick, R. (1995). Testing a Tripartite Model: I Evaluating the Convergent and Discriminant Validity of Anxiety and Depression Symptom Scales. Journal of abnormal psychology, 104, 3–3. doi:10.1037/0021–843X.104.1.3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, A., Welford, M., King, P., Papageorgiou, C., Wisely, J., & Mendel, E. (2010). A Pilot Randomized Trial of Metacognitive Therapy vs Applied Relaxation in the Treatment of Adults with Generalized Anxiety Disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48(5), 429. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2009.11.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

Joshua Curtiss declares no conflicts of interest; David H. Klemanski declares no conflicts of interest.

Experiment Participants

All procedures were approved by an institutional review board.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Yale University, Department of Psychology, 2 Hillhouse Avenue, P.O. Box 208205, New Haven, CT, 06520-8205, USA

    Joshua Curtiss & David H. Klemanski

Authors
  1. Joshua Curtiss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David H. Klemanski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David H. Klemanski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Curtiss, J., Klemanski, D.H. Factor Analysis of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in a Heterogeneous Clinical Sample. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 36, 683–694 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-014-9429-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-014-9429-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation