Abstract
Economists are now familiar with ‘between’ and ‘within’ group inequality decompositions, for race, gender, spatial units, etc. But what exactly is the normative significance of the empirical results produced by these decompositions? This paper raises some basic questions about policy interpretations of decompositions that are found in the literature.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akerlof, G. and Kranton, R.: Economics and identity, Quarterly Journal of Economics 115(3) (2000), 715–753.
Anand, S.: Inequality and Poverty in Malaysia: Measurement and Decomposition, Oxford University, Oxford, 1983.
Au, C.-C. and Henderson, V.: How Migration Restrictions Limit Agglomeration and Productivity in China. Paper presented at the Cornell/LSE/WIDER Conference on Spatial Inequality and Development. Downloadable from http://www.unu.wider.edu, 2002.
Collier, P. and Hoeffler, A.: On the economic causes of Civil Wars, Oxford Economic Papers 50 (1998), 563–573.
Cowell, F.A.: Measurement of inequality, In: A.B. Atkinson and F. Bourguignon (eds.), Handbook of Income Distribution, North Holland, Amsterdam, 2000.
Dasgputa, I. and Kanbur, R.: Bridging communal divides: Separation, patronage, integration, In: C.B. Barrett (ed), The Social Economics of Poverty: Identities, Groups, Communities and Networks, Routledge, London, 2005.
Easterly, W. and Levine, R.: Africa's growth tragedy: Policy and ethnic divisions, Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(4) (1997), 1203–1250, November.
Elbers, C., Lanjouw, P., Mistiaen, J., Ozler, B. and Simler, K.: On the unequal inequality of poor communities, World Bank Economic Review 18(3) (2004), 401–421.
Elbers, C., Lanjouw, P., Mistiaen, J. and Ozler, B.: Re-interpreting Sub-Group Inequality Decompositions, World Bank, processed, 2005.
Foster, J. and Sen, A.K.: On Economic Inequality. Expanded Edition, Clarendon, Oxford, 1997.
Fujita, M., Krugman, P. and Venables, A.J.: The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions and International Trade, MIT, 1999.
Kanbur, R.: Income distribution and development, In: A.B. Atkinson and F. Bourguignon (eds.), Handbook of Income Distribution, North Holland, Amsterdam, 2000.
Kanbur, R.: Education, Empowerment and Gender Inequalities, In: B. Pleskovic and N. Stern (eds.), The New Reform Agenda, Oxford University Press for The World Bank, 2003.
Kanbur, R. and Zhang, X.: Which regional inequality? The evolution of rural–urban and inland–coastal inequality in China, Journal of Comparative Economics 27 (1999), 686–701.
Ravallion, M.: Externalities in rural development: Evidence for China, In: R. Kanbur and A.J. Venables (eds.), Spatial Inequality and Development, Oxford University Press, 2005.
Shorrocks, A.F. and Wan, G.: Spatial decomposition of inequality, Journal of Economic Geography 5(1) (2005), 59–81.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kanbur, R. The policy significance of inequality decompositions. J Econ Inequal 4, 367–374 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-005-9013-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-005-9013-5