Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Culture and the Structure of Affect: A Bifactor Modeling Approach

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Happiness Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper tested the impact of culture on the basic structure of affect. It examined positive affect and negative affect at three levels of activation in the U.S. and China. It used a well-suited tool, the bifactor model, to separate the common variance shared by all types of affect from the variance unique to each. The findings indicate that the structure of affect is different cross-culturally. In the U.S., the most fundamental dimension is defined by moderate activation of positive affect and negative affect, which is the largely bipolar dimension of pleasure-displeasure, whereas in China, it is defined by moderate activation of positive affect only, which is pleasure. In both cultures, negative affect across levels of activation forms another important dimension. Beyond these basic dimensions, secondary dimensions are also identified in both cultures: high activation positive affect, low activation positive affect, and low activation negative affect. They form relatively weak unique factors, independent of the two basic dimensions, suggesting that they are largely mixtures of the basic dimensions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bagozzi, R. P., Wong, N., & Yi, Y. (1999). The role of culture and gender in the relationship between positive and negative affect. Cognition and Emotion, 13, 641–672. doi:10.1080/026999399379023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, L. F., & Russell, J. A. (1999). The structure of current affect controversies and emerging consensus. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 10–14. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1252–1265. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005.

  • Carroll, J. M., Yik, M. S. M., Russell, J. A., & Barrett, L. F. (1999). On the psychometric principles of affect. Review of General Psychology, 3, 14–22. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.3.1.14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S. (2001). Affect and the functional bases of behavior: On the dimensional structure of affective experience. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 345–356. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F. F., Hayes, A., Carver, C. S., Laurenceau, J.-P., & Zhang, Z. (2012). Modeling general and specific variance in multifaceted constructs: A comparison of the bifactor model to other approaches. Journal of Personality, 80, 219–251. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00739.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F. F., Jing, Y., Hayes, A., & Lee, J. M. (2013). Two concepts or two approaches? A bifactor analysis of psychological and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 1033–1068. doi:10.1007/s10902-012-9367-x.

  • Chen, F. F., West, S. G., & Sousa, K. H. (2006). A comparison of bifactor and second-order models of quality of life. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41, 189–225. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr4102_5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Emmons, R. A. (1984). The independence of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1105–1117. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.47.5.1105.

  • Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (2000). Subjective emotional well-being. Handbook of Emotions (2nd ed.). (pp. 325–337) New York, NY: Guilford Press. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/619491964?accountid=10457.

  • Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1999). Is there a universal need for positive self regard? Psychological Review, 106, 766–794. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Insel, T., Cuthbert, B., Garvey, M., Heinssen, R., Pine, D. S., Quinn, K., et al. (2010). Research domain criteria (RDoC): Toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 748–751. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09091379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A., & McCoach, D. B. (2003). Effect of the number of variables on measures of fit in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 333–351. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM1003_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., & Kurokawa, M. (2000). Culture, emotion, and well-being: Good feelings in Japan and the United States. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 93–124. doi:10.1080/026999300379003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, R. J., & Diener, E. (1992). Promises and problems with the circumplex model of emotion. Emotion. (pp. 25–59) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/618212799?accountid=10457.

  • Lawton, M. P., Kleban, M. H., & Dean, J. (1993). Affect and age: Cross-sectional comparisons of structure and prevalence. Psychology and Aging, 8, 165–175. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.8.2.165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84–99. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mogilner, C., Kamvar, S. D., & Aaker, J. (2011). The shifting meaning of happiness. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 395–402. doi:10.1177/1948550610393987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K. & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2009). Mplus User’s Guide (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

  • Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E. (1999). Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. American Psychologist, 54, 741–754. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.9.741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reise, S. P. (2012). The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 667–696. doi:10.1080/00273171.2012.715555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reise, S. P., Morizot, J., & Hays, R. D. (2007). The role of the bifactor model in resolving dimensionality issues in health outcomes measures. Quality of Life Research, 16(Suppl 1), 19–31. doi:10.1007/s11136-007-9183-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reisenzein, R. (1994). Pleasure-arousal theory and the intensity of emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 525–539. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 525–539. doi:10.1037/h0077714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110, 145–172. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. A., & Carroll, J. M. (1999). On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 3–30. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.1.3.

  • Schimmack, U. (2009). Culture, gender, and the bipolarity of momentary affect: A critical re-examination. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 599–604. doi:10.1080/02699930902784313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schimmack, U., Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2002). Life satisfaction is a momentary judgment and a stable personality characteristic: The use of chronically accessible and stable sources. Journal of Personality, 70, 345–384. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.05008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schimmack, U., & Grob, A. (2000). Dimensional models of core affect: A quantitative comparison by means of structural equation modeling. European Journal of Personality, 14, 325–345. doi:10.1002/1099-0984(200007/08)14:4%3C325::AID-PER380%3E3.0.CO;2-I.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosberg, H. S. (1941). A scale for the judgment of facial expressions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 497–510. doi:10.1037/h0061489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scollon, C., Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2005). An experience sampling and cross-cultural investigation of the relation between pleasant and unpleasant affect. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 27–52. doi:10.1080/02699930441000076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. (1927). The abilities of man. London: MacMillan. doi:10.1126/science.68.1750.38-a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer-Rodgers, J., Peng, K., & Wang, L. (2010). Dialecticism and the co-occurrence of positive and negative emotions across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41, 109–115. doi:10.1177/0022022109349508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, D. J., & Meyer, J. P. (2009). Two-dimensional affective space: A new approach to orienting the axes. Emotion, 9, 214–237. doi:10.1037/a0014612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steyer, R., Schwenkmezger, P., Notz, P., & Eid, M. (1994). Testtheoretische Analysen des Mehrdimensionalen Befindlichkeitsfragebogen (MDBF) [Theoretical analysis of a multidimensional mood questionnaire (MDBF)]. Diagnostica, 40, 320–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, A. A., Schwartz, J. E., Broderick, J. E., & Deaton, A. (2010). A snapshot of the age distribution of psychological well-being in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 9985–9990. doi:10.1073/pnas.1003744107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tellegen, A. (1985). Structures of mood and personality and their relevance to assessing anxiety, with an emphasis on self-report. In A. H. Tuma & J. D. Maser (Eds.), Anxiety and the anxiety disorders (pp. 681–706). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thayer, R. E. (1989). The biopsychology of mood and arousal. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/617678111?accountid=10457.

  • Titchener, E. B. (1908). Lectures on the elementary psychology of feeling and attention. New York: Macmillan. doi:10.1037/10867-000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, J. L., Knutson, B., & Fung, H. H. (2006). Cultural variation in affect valuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 288–307. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.2.288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1997). The measurement and mismeasurement of mood: Recurrent and emergent issues. Journal of Personality Assessment, 86, 267–296. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6802_4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219–235. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Wiese, D., Vaidya, J., & Tellegen, A. (1999). The two general activation systems of affect: Structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 820–838. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.820.

  • Wundt, W. G. (1912). An introduction to psychology. London: G. Allen. doi:10.1037/13784-000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yik, M. (2007). Culture, gender, and the bipolarity of momentary affect. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 664–680. doi:10.1080/02699930600823702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yik, M.,  Russell, J. A., & Feldman Barrett, L. (1999). Structure of self-reported current affect: Integration and beyond. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 600–619. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.600.

  • Yik, M. S. M., Russell, J. A., & Steiger, J. H. (2011). A 12-point circumplex structure of core affect. Emotion, 11, 705–731. doi:10.1037/a0023980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Education, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, 19716, USA

    Fang Fang Chen

  2. Department of Psychology, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong

    Fang Fang Chen

  3. Department of Psychology, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, China

    Liying Bai

  4. Department of Psychology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA

    Jeong Min Lee & Yiming Jing

Authors
  1. Fang Fang Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Liying Bai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jeong Min Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yiming Jing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fang Fang Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, F.F., Bai, L., Lee, J.M. et al. Culture and the Structure of Affect: A Bifactor Modeling Approach. J Happiness Stud 17, 1801–1824 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9671-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9671-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation