Skip to main content
Log in

Structural Home Environment Effects on Developmental Trajectories of Self-Control and Adolescent Risk Taking

  • Empirical Research
  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Extant literature has demonstrated that self-control is critical for health and adjustment in adolescence. Questions remain regarding whether there are individuals that may be most vulnerable to impaired self-control development and whether aspects of the structural home environment may predict membership in these subgroups, as well as the behavioral consequences of impaired self-control trajectories. The present study utilized growth mixture modeling and data from 1083 individuals (50% female, 82% White) from age 8.5 to 15 years to identify four latent classes of self-control development. Additionally, higher household chaos and lower socioeconomic status at age 8.5 were associated with maladaptive trajectories of self-control at ages 8.5–11.5. In turn, maladaptive self-control trajectories at ages 8.5–11.5 were associated with higher risk taking at age 15. The results highlight the importance of increased structure and support for at-risk youth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berry, D., McCartney, K., Petrill, S., Deater‐Deckard, K., & Blair, C. (2014). Gene–environment interaction between DRD4 7‐repeat VNTR and early child‐care experiences predicts self‐regulation abilities in prekindergarten. Developmental Psychobiology, 56, 373–391. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.21105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, C., & Ursache, A. (2011). A bidirectional model of executive functions and self-regulation. In K. D. Vohs & R. F. Baumeister (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: research, theory, and applications. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boelema, S. R., Harakeh, Z., Ormel, J., & Hartman, C. A. (2014). Executive functioning shows differential maturation from early to late adolescence: longitudinal findings from a TRAILS study. Neuropsychology, 28, 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000049.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brody, G. H., Flor, D. L., & Morgan Gibson, N. (1999). Linking maternal efficacy beliefs, developmental goals, parenting practices, and child competence in rural single‐parent African American families. Child Development, 70, 1197–1208. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00087.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (2001). Growing chaos in the lives of children, youth, and families: how can we turn it around? In J. C. Westman (Ed.), Parenthood in America (pp. 197–210). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, B. J., Getz, S., & Galvan, A. (2008). The adolescent brain. Developmental Review, 28, 62–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2007.08.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conger, R. D., & Elder, Jr, G. H. (1994). Families in troubled times: adapting to change in rural America. Social Institutions and social change. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall, A. A., Magnusson, B. M., & Novilla, M. L. B. (2017). Growth in adolescent self-regulation and impact on sexual risk-taking: a curve-of-factors analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0706-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. W. (2006). Child development and the physical environment. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 423–451. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190057.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. W. & Wachs, T. D. (Eds.) (2010). Chaos and its influence on children’s development. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. W., Eckenrode, J., & Marcynyszyn, L. A. (2010). Chaos and the macrosetting: the role of poverty and socioeconomic status. In G. W. Evans & T. D. Wachs (Eds.), Chaos and its influence on children’s development: an ecological perspective (pp. 225-238). 10.1037/12057-014

  • Evans, G. W., Gonnella, C., Marcynyszyn, L. A., Gentile, L., & Salpekar, N. (2005). The role of chaos in poverty and children’s socioemotional adjustment. Psychological Science, 16, 560–565. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01575.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fabes, R. A., Martin, C. L., & Hanish, L. D. (2009). Children’s behaviors and interactions with peers. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 45–62). New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fosco, G. M., Frank, J. L., Stormshak, E. A., & Dishion, T. J. (2013). Opening the “Black Box”: family check-up intervention effects on self-regulation that prevents growth in problem behavior and substance use. Journal of School Psychology, 51, 455–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2013.02.001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Frankenhuis, W. E., Panchanathan, K., & Nettle, D. (2016). Cognition in harsh and unpredictable environments. Current Opinion in Psychology, 7, 76–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.08.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller‐Rowell, T. E., Evans, G. W., Paul, E., & Curtis, D. S. (2015). The role of poverty and chaos in the development of task persistence among adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 25, 606–613. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

  • Gresham, F. M., & Elliott, S. N. (1990). Social skills rating system: manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

  • Hardaway, C. R., Wilson, M. N., Shaw, D. S., & Dishion, T. J. (2012). Family functioning and externalizing behaviour among low‐income children: self‐regulation as a mediator. Infant and Child Development, 21, 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.765.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, C. J., Kim-Spoon, J., & Deater-Deckard, K. (2016). Linking executive function and peer problems from early childhood through middle adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 44, 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-015-0044-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, C., Ensor, R., Wilson, A., & Graham, A. (2009). Tracking executive function across the transition to school: A latent variable approach. Developmental Neuropsychology, 35, 20–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565640903325691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, R. E., Holmes, C., Farley, J. P., & Kim-Spoon, J. (2015). Delay discounting mediates parent–adolescent relationship quality and risky sexual behavior for low self-control adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44, 1674–1687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0332-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kim-Spoon, J. & Grimm, K. J. (2016). Latent growth modeling and developmental psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti (Ed.), Development and psychopathology : Vol. I Theory and Method, 3rd edn (pp. 986–1041). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

  • Kim-Spoon, J., Holmes, C., & Deater-Deckard, K. (2015). Attention regulates anger and fear to predict adolescent risk-taking behaviors. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 56, 756–765. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12338.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • King, K. M., Lengua, L. J., & Monahan, K. C. (2013). Individual differences in the development of self-regulation during pre-adolescence: connections to context and adjustment. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41, 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-012-9665-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 3rd edn. New York, NY: Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, G.W. (2005). Children’s peer relations and social competence: a century of progress. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.

  • Lengua, L. J., Honorado, E., & Bush, N. R. (2007). Contextual risk and parenting as predictors of effortful control and social competence in preschool children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 28, 40–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2006.10.001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, Y., Mendell, N. R., & Rubin, D. B. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88, 757–778. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/88.3.767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magar, E. C., Phillips, L. H., & Hosie, J. A. (2008). Self-regulation and risk-taking. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 153–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.03.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masten, A. S., & Cicchetti, D. (2010). Developmental cascades. Development and Psychopathology, 22, 491–495. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579410000222.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matheny, A. P., Wachs, T. D., Ludwig, J. L., & Phillips, K. (1995). Bringing order out of chaos: psychometric characteristics of the confusion, hubbub, and order scale. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 16, 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0193-3973(95)90028-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, T. E., Arseneault, L., Belsky, D., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., & Caspi, A. (2011). A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 2693–2698. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010076108.

  • Mullainathan, S., & Shafir, E. (2013). Scarcity: why having too little means so much. New York, NY: Time Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998). Mplus User’s Guide. 7th edn. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nigg, J. T. (2017). Annual research review: on the relations among self‐regulation, self‐control, executive functioning, effortful control, cognitive control, impulsivity, risk‐taking, and inhibition for developmental psychopathology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 58, 361–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12675.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ordaz, S. J., Foran, W., Velanova, K., & Luna, B. (2013). Longitudinal growth curves of brain function underlying inhibitory control through adolescence. Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 18109–18124. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1741-13.2013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pianta, R. (1992). Student-teacher relationship scale. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, D., Betancourt, L. M., Brodsky, N. L., Giannetta, J. M., Yang, W., & Hurt, H. (2011). Does adolescent risk taking imply weak executive function? A prospective study of relations between working memory performance, impulsivity, and risk taking in early adolescence. Developmental Science, 14, 1119–1133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01061.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sclove, L. S. (1987). Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika, 53, 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L. (2007). Risk taking in adolescence new perspectives from brain and behavioral science. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 55–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00475.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L. (2008). A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Review, 28, 78–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2007.08.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tofighi, D., & Enders, C. K. (2007). Identifying the correct number of classes in growth mixture models. In G. R. Hancock (Ed.), Advances in latent variable mixture models. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ursache, A., & Noble, K. G. (2016). Neurocognitive development in socioeconomic context: multiple mechanisms and implications for measuring socioeconomic status. Psychophysiology, 53, 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12547.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Vazsonyi, A. T., & Huang, L. (2010). Where self-control comes from: on the development of self-control and its relationship to deviance over time. Developmental Psychology, 46, 245–257. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016538.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vazsonyi, A. T., Roberts, J. W., Huang, L., & Vaughn, M. G. (2015). Why focusing on nurture made and still makes sense: the biosocial development of self-control. The Routledge international handbook of biosocial criminology (pp. 263–279). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon-Feagans, L., Willoughby, M., & Garrett-Peters, P. (2016). Predictors of behavioral regulation in kindergarten: household chaos, parenting, and early executive functions. Developmental Psychology, 52, 430–441. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000087.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wachs, T. D., & Evans, G. W. (2010). Chaos in context. In G. W. Evans & T. D. Wachs (Eds.), Chaos and its influence on children’s development: an ecological perspective (pp. 3–13). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12057-001.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wickrama, K. A. S., O’Neal, C. W., & Holmes, C. (2017). Towards a heuristic research model linking early socioeconomic adversity and youth cumulative disease risk: an integrative review. Adolescent Research Review, 2, 161–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-017-0054-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse awarded to Jungmeen Kim-Spoon/Brooks King-Casas (DA 036017) and Gene Brody (DA 027827), and from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development awarded to Kirby Deater-Deckard (HD 054481). We thank Kathy Faris for reviewing literature relevant to the current study and Eileen Neubaum Carlan for editorial assistance. The Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development was conducted by the NICHD Early Child Care Research Network, and was supported by NICHD through a cooperative agreement that calls for scientific collaboration between the grantees and the NICHD staff. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development or the National Institutes of Health. The authors thank the study participants and research staff.

Authors’ Contributions

C.H. conceived of the study, participated in its design, performed the statistical analyses and drafted the manuscript; A.B. performed statistical analyses, edited the manuscript, and substantially contributed to the revisions of the manuscript; R.K. participated in the design of the study and helped to draft the manuscript; K.D.D. conceived of the study, participated in the design and interpretation of the data, and edited the manuscript; J.K.S. conceived of the study, participated in the design and interpretation of the data, and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse awarded to Jungmeen Kim-Spoon/Brooks King-Casas (DA 036017) and Gene Brody (DA 027827), and from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development awarded to Kirby Deater-Deckard (HD 054481).

Data Sharing and Declaration

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development within the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development at https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/series/00233.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Holmes.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 5.

Table 5 19 Item of the risky behavior questionnaire (Conger and Elder 1994)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Holmes, C., Brieant, A., Kahn, R. et al. Structural Home Environment Effects on Developmental Trajectories of Self-Control and Adolescent Risk Taking. J Youth Adolescence 48, 43–55 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0921-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0921-7

Keywords

Navigation