Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of skin surface temperatures after ultrasounds with use of paraffin oil and ultrasounds with use of gel

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ultrasound heat effects are relatively easily perceived, being manifested by a tissue temperature rise resulting from intratissular conversion of mechanical energy into thermal one. The goal of the study reported was an evaluation of skin surface temperature distribution changes as a result of ultrasound therapy applied, with reference to the coupling medium used. The study involved 40 healthy students, with the mean age of the subjects in the study group being 20 years. All of the subjects were submitted to sonographic procedures with the use of two different coupling media, whilst skin surface temperature at the site was recorded by a thermovision camera. Sonographic beams were applied to the region of the left quadriceps femoris muscle by a dynamic method, using a continuous ultrasound wave of 0.5 W/cm2 intensity and 1 MHz frequency. The area treated amounted to 300 cm², the sonotherapy lasted 10 min. Paraffin oil enhanced the thermal effects of the ultrasound signals applied, inducing mean tissue temperature rises. The mean temperature recorded immediately after ultrasound application was higher than the mean base temperature by 0.33 °C, rising to 0.62 °C at the 15th minute following the procedure, with P < 0.05. In contrast, application of gel led to considerable reductions in the mean temperatures of tissues submitted to ultrasound treatment: immediately after the sonographic procedure, tissue temperature decreased by 3.96 °C. On the basis of the results of the study conducted, it was concluded that the type of coupling medium applied influenced temperature levels within the treated area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goraj-Szczypiorowska B, Zając L, Skalska-Izdebska R. Evaluation of factors influencing the quality and efficacy of ultrasound and phonophoresis treatment. Ortop Traumatol Rehab 2007;5(6):449–58.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dyszkiewicz A. Sonotherapy and modifications. Rehab w Prakt. 2007;4:37–40.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pyszczek I, Kujawa J, Talar J. Selected physical and biophysical properties of ultrasonic waves used in physical therapy. Ortop Traumatol Rehab. 2002;4(3):270–382.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Szymańska J, Witkoś J, Nowotny J. Changes of skin temperature after ultrasounds continuous and impulse waves. Fizjoter Pol 2008;2(4):161–9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jaśkiewicz J. Ionthoforesis and fonophoresis—theoretical basis and use in practice. Rehab Med. 2000;4:5–48.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Świst D, Franek A, Polak A, Król P. Selected issues in progressive ultrasound therapy of damaged tissues. Ann Acad Med Siles. 1999;3839:97–111.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dziendziel R. Ultrasounds in physiotherapy. Acta Bio Opt Inform Med. 2006;12(4):250–2.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hołowacz I, Podbielska H, Hurnik P, Mielczarek W, Zdziarski J. Computer aide acquisition and thermal image processing for evaluation of the influence of low temperatures. Acta Bio Opt Inform Med. 2000;6:35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Taradaj J. Use of thermography in modern medicine. Rehab w Prakt. 2007;3:16–7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lehman JF, DeLateur BJ, Warren CG, et al. Heating produced by ultrasound in bone and soft tissue. Arch Pchys Med Rehabil. 1967;48(8):397–401.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Taradaj J, Dalibog P. Modern sonotherapy. Rehab w Prakt. 2006;3:26–8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Williams R. Production and transmission of ultrasound. Physiotherapy. 1987;73:113–6.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Holcomb WR. The effect of superficial heating before 1-MHz ultrasound on tissue temperature. J Sport Rehabil. 2003;2:95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Burr PO, Demchak TJ, Cordova ML, Ingersoll CD, Stone MB. Effect of altering intensity during 1-MHz ultrasound treatment on increasing triceps surae temperature. J Sport Rehabil. 2004;13(4):275–86.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chan AK, Myrer JI, Meason G, Draper DO. Temperature changes in human patellar tendon in response to therapeutic ultrasound. J Athl Train. 1998;33:130–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Draper DO, Castel JC, Castel D. Rate of temperature increase in human muscle during 1 MHz and 3 MHz continuous ultrasound. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1995;22:142–50.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cholewka A, Drzyzga Z, Sieron A, Stanek A. Thermovision diagnostics in chosen spine diseases treated by whole body cryotherapy. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2010;102(1):113–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Li FF, Liu J. Thermal infrared mapping of the freezing phase change activity of micro liquid droplet. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2010;102(1):155–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gieremek K, Saulicz E, Nowotny J. The local and the reflectoric changes of the temperature of the skin under the influence of some physical procedures. Post Rehab. 1991;5(3):5–11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aneta Demidaś.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ratajczak, B., Boerner, E., Demidaś, A. et al. Comparison of skin surface temperatures after ultrasounds with use of paraffin oil and ultrasounds with use of gel. J Therm Anal Calorim 109, 387–393 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-011-1716-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-011-1716-1

Keywords

Navigation