Abstract
Group identification serves important functions such as motivating group members to work towards group goals and sustaining their efforts to maintain a positive group identity. Thus increasing or decreasing group identification has implications for group members’ commitment to achieving group goals. We propose that group identification and group-level efforts to protect group identity can be reduced or enhanced by deterrents to feeling identified with the ingroup. To test this idea, we exposed participants to different types of deterrents to group identification: a reason for not liking the ingroup (Study 1), difficulty of achieving an ingroup goal (Study 2), and a threat to ingroup positive identity (Study 3). Group identification and strength of efforts to achieve a group goal increased with the strength of deterrence, to the point where it decreased in the strong deterrent condition. Implications for intergroup motivation and social identity are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
As part of an exploratory analysis, we measured the following emotional responses: good mood, bad mood, uncomfortable, guilty, ashamed, angry, happy, frustrated, helpless, hopeless, excited, sad, regret, calm, outraged, pride, discouraged, and apathetic. We previously theorized that Brehm’s emotional intensity paradigm could be used to detect specific emotional responses instigated in a situation because only the experienced emotion would show a cubic pattern from deterrence (Miron et al. 2011). Thus, we expected that only the primary emotion elicited would reveal a cubic pattern following the deterrence manipulation. Out of all specific emotions, only pride showed a significant cubic effect, F(1, 40) = 5.62, p = .02, MSE = 3.37. Pride decreased from the control (M = 5.29, SD = 1.94) to low deterrence (M = 3.82, SD = 1.94), t(40) = 1.99, p = .05, increased from low to moderate deterrence (M = 5.67, SD = 1.94), t(40) = 2.12, p = .05, but did not decrease significantly from moderate to high deterrence (M = 4.70, SD = 1.42), t(40) = 1.15, p = .26. While this finding should be interpreted with caution since only one in 18 emotions was significant, it remains possible that pride was the only emotion experienced by the participants. This could further suggest that group identification is strongly associated with feelings of ingroup pride; these two measures were indeed highly correlated in Study 3, r = .67, p < .001. Taken together, the results seem consistent with previous work (Brewer 1999; Cialdini et al. 1976) and support our view of identification as mobilizing group members’ commitment to achieving ingroup goals.
References
Barreto, M., & Ellemers, N. (2000). You can’t always do what you want: Social identity and self-presentational determinants of the choice to work for a low-status group. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 891–906. doi:10.1177/01461672002610001.
Bar-Tal, D. (2013). Intractable conflicts: Socio-psychological foundations and dynamics. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Branscombe, N. R., Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1999a). The context and content of social identity threat. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 35–58). Oxford: Blackwell.
Branscombe, N. R., & Miron, A. M. (2004). Interpreting the ingroup’s negative actions toward another group: Emotional reactions to appraised harm. In L. Z. Tiedens & C. W. Leach (Eds.), The social life of emotions (pp. 314–335). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Branscombe, N. R., Schmitt, M. T., & Harvey, R. D. (1999b). Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 135–149. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.135.
Branscombe, N. R., Schmitt, M. T., & Schiffhauer, K. (2007). Racial attitudes in response to thoughts of White privilege. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 203–215. doi:10.1002/ejsp.348.
Brehm, J. W. (1999). The intensity of emotion. Personality and Social Psychological Review, 3, 2–22. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0301_1.
Brehm, J. W., & Miron, A. M. (2006). Can the simultaneous experience of opposing emotions really occur? Motivation and Emotion, 30, 13–30. doi:10.1007/s11031-006-9007-z.
Brehm, J. W., Miron, A. M., & Miller, K. (2009). Affect as a motivational state. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 1069–1089. doi:10.1080/02699930802323642.
Brehm, J. W., & Self, E. A. (1989). The intensity of motivation. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 109–131. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.40.020189.000545.
Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429–444. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00126.
Cialdini, R. B., Borden, R. J., Thorne, A., Walker, M. R., Freeman, S., & Sloan, L. R. (1976). Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 366–375. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.34.3.366.
Crandall, C. S., & Eshleman, A. (2003). A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 414–446. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.414.
Deaux, K. (1996). Social identification. In E. T. Higgins & A. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 857–915). New York: Guilford.
Doosje, B., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of group-based guilt: The effects of ingroup identification. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 9, 325–338. doi:10.1177/1368430206064637.
Doosje, B., Spears, R., & Ellemers, N. (2002). Social identity as both cause and effect: The development of group identification in response to anticipated and actual changes in the intergroup status hierarchy. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 57–76. doi:10.1348/014466602165054.
Ellemers, N., Van Knippenberg, A., & Wilke, H. (1990). The influence of permeability of group boundaries and stability of group status on strategies of individual mobility and social change. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 233–246. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1990.tb00902.x.
Higgins, E. T. (2006). Value from hedonic experience and engagement. Psychological Review, 113, 439–460. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.113.3.439.
Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1993). Towards a single-process uncertainty reduction model of social motivation in groups. In M. A. Hogg & D. Abrams (Eds.), Group motivation: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 173–190). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Jetten, J., & Branscombe, N. R. (2006). Living on the edge: Dynamics of intragroup and intergroup rejection experiences. In R. Brown & D. Capozza (Eds.), Social identities: Motivational, emotional and cultural influences (pp. 91–107). New York: Sage.
Klein, O., Licata, L., & Pierucci, S. (2011). Does group identification facilitate or prevent collective guilt about past misdeeds? Resolving the paradox. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 563–572. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02028.x.
Klein, O., Spears, R., & Reicher, S. (2007). Social identity performance: Extending the strategic side of SIDE. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 1–18. doi:10.1177/1088868306294588.
Leach, C. W., Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M. (2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 234–249. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.234.
Leach, C. W., van Zomeren, M., Zebel, S., Vliek, M., Pennekamp, S. F., Doosje, B., et al. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multi-component) model of ingroup identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 144–165. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144.
Maitner, A. T., Mackie, D. M., & Smith, E. R. (2007). Antecedents and consequences of satisfaction and guilt following ingroup aggression. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 223–237. doi:10.1177/1368430207075154.
Miron, A. M., Branscombe, N. R., & Biernat, M. (2010). Motivated shifting of justice standards. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 768–779. doi:10.1177/0146167210370031.
Miron, A. M., & Brehm, J. W. (2012). Emotional intensity theory and its cardiovascular implications for emotional states. In R. A. Wright & G. H. E. Gendolla (Eds.), How motivation affects cardiovascular response: Mechanisms and applications (pp. 121–137). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Miron, A. M., Ferguson, M. A., & Peterson, A. (2011). Difficulty of refusal to assist the outgroup nonmonotonically affects the intensity of prejudiced affect. Motivation and Emotion, 45, 484–498. doi:10.1007/s11031-011-9220-2.
Miron, A. M., Knepfel, D., & Parkinson, S. K. (2009). The surprising effect of partner flaws and qualities on romantic affect. Motivation and Emotion, 33, 261–276. doi:10.1007/sl1031-009-9138-0.
Pantaleo, G. (2011). Enjoying multiplicity: From familiarity to ‘Multiple Perspectives’. In M. Cadinu, S. Galdi, & A. Maass (Eds.), Social perception, cognition, and language in honour of Arcuri (pp. 51–65). Padua: Cleup.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731.
Roberson, B. F., & Wright, R. A. (1994). Difficulty as a determinant of interpersonal appeal: A social-motivational application of energization theory. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 15, 373–388. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp1503_10.
Schmitt, M. T., Miller, D. A., Branscombe, N. R., & Brehm, J. W. (2008). The difficulty of making reparations affects the intensity of collective guilt. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 11, 267–279. doi:10.1177/1368430208090642.
Shah, J. Y., & Gardner, W. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of Motivation Science. New York: Guilford Press.
Silvia, P. J., & Brehm, J. W. (2001). Exploring alternative deterrents to emotional intensity: Anticipated happiness, distraction, and sadness. Cognition and Emotion, 15, 575–592. doi:10.1080/02699930143000040.
Steele, C. M. (2011). Whistling Vivaldi: How stereotypes affect us and what we can do. New York: W. W. Norton.
Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups. Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.
Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity of intergroup behaviour. In S. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
Veenstra, K., & Haslam, S. A. (2000). Willingness to participate in industrial protest: Exploring social identification in context. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 153–172. doi:10.1348/014466607X231091.
Walker, I., & Mann, L. (1987). Unemployment, relative deprivation and social protest. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 275–283. doi:10.1177/0146167287132012.
Wright, R. A., & Brehm, J. W. (1989). Energization and goal attractiveness. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Goal concepts in personality and social psychology (pp. 169–210). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wright, R. A., & Gendolla, G. H. E. (Eds.). (2012). How motivation affects cardiovascular response: Mechanisms and applications. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Wright, R. A., & Pantaleo, G. (2013). Effort processes in achieving performance outcomes: Interrelations among and roles of core constructs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 705–706. doi:10.1017/S0140525X13001180.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pantaleo, G., Miron, A.M., Ferguson, M.A. et al. Effects of deterrence on intensity of group identification and efforts to protect group identity. Motiv Emot 38, 855–865 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014-9440-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014-9440-3